Introduction. Smoking cessation integration within lung cancer screening programs is challenging. Currently, phone counselling is available across Canada for individuals referred by healthcare workers and by self-referral. We compared quit rates after phone counselling interventions between participants who self-refer, those referred by healthcare workers, and those referred by a lung cancer screening program. Methods. This is a retrospective cohort study of participants referred to provincial smoking cessation quit line in contemporaneous cohorts: self-referred participants, healthcare worker referred, and those referred by a lung cancer screening program if they were still actively smoking at the time of first contact. Baseline, covariates (sociodemographic information, smoking history, and history of mental health disorder) and quit intentions (stage of change, readiness for change, previous use of quit programs, and previous quit attempts) were compared among the three cohorts. Our primary outcome was defined as self-reported 30-day abstinence rates at 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify whether group assignment was associated with higher quit rates. Results. Participants referred by a lung cancer screening program had low quit rates (12%, 95% CI: 5-19) at six months despite the use of phone counselling. Compared to patients who were self-referred to the smoking cessation phone helpline, individuals referred by a lung cancer screening program were much less likely to quit (adjusted OR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.17-0.8), whereas those referred by healthcare workers were twice as likely to quit (adjusted OR 2.16 (1.3-3.58)) even after adjustment for differences in smoking intensity and quit intentions. Conclusions. Phone counselling alone has very limited benefit in a lung cancer screening program. Participants differ significantly from those who are otherwise referred by healthcare workers. This study underlines the importance of a dedicated and personalized tobacco treatment program within every lung cancer screening program. The program should incorporate best practices and encourage treatment regardless of readiness to quit.
机构:
Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, 101 Merrimac St,10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114 USAMassachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, 101 Merrimac St,10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Munshi, Vidit
McMahon, Pamela
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, 101 Merrimac St,10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114 USA
Harvard Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USAMassachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, 101 Merrimac St,10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114 USA
McMahon, Pamela
[J].
CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS,
2013,
1
(04):
: 242
-
248
机构:
Hop Tenon, Unite Tabacol, AP HP, Serv Pneumol, 4 Rue Chine, F-75970 Paris 20, FranceCHR Metz Thionville, Serv Pneumol, 1 Allee Chateau, F-57085 Metz, France
Ruppert, A-M
Tiotiu, A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
CHRU Nancy, Dept Pneumol, Rue Morvan, F-54500 Vanduvre Les Nancy, FranceCHR Metz Thionville, Serv Pneumol, 1 Allee Chateau, F-57085 Metz, France