WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IN ZIMBABWE: EVIDENCE FROM A CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDY

被引:8
|
作者
Muchapondwa, Edwin [1 ]
Carlsson, Fredrik [2 ]
Kohlin, Gunnar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Sch Econ, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[2] Gothenburg Univ, Dept Econ, S-41124 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
C25; H41; Q26; CAMPFIRE; contingent valuation; double-bounded spike model; elephant; Zimbabwe;
D O I
10.1111/j.1813-6982.2008.00182.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
If communities living adjacent to the elephant see it as a burden, then they cannot be its stewards. To assess their valuation of it, a contingent valuation method study was conducted for one CAMPFIRE district in Zimbabwe. Respondents were classified according to their preferences over the elephant. The median willingness to pay for the preservation of 200 elephants is ZW$260 (US$4.73) for respondents who considered the elephant a public good and ZW$137 (US$2.49) for those favouring its translocation. The preservation of 200 elephants yields an annual net worth of ZW$10,828 (US$196) to CAMPFIRE households. However, the majority of households (62%) do not support elephant preservation. This is one argument against devolution of elephant conservation. External transfers constitute one way of providing additional economic incentives to local communities.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 704
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条