Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:161
|
作者
Liao, Wei-Chih [1 ,5 ]
Chien, Kuo-Liong [1 ,5 ]
Lin, Yu-Lin [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Ming-Shiang [1 ]
Lin, Jaw-Town [4 ]
Wang, Hsiu-Po [1 ]
Tu, Yu-Kang [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[4] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Sch Med, New Taipei City, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Inst Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Taipei 100, Taiwan
来源
LANCET ONCOLOGY | 2013年 / 14卷 / 11期
关键词
FOLINIC ACID; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; CHEMORADIATION; GEMCITABINE; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; TRIALS; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; FLUOROURACIL;
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70388-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Major adjuvant treatments for pancreatic adenocarcinoma include fluorouracil, gemcitabine, chemoradiation, and chemoradiation plus fluorouracil or gemcitabine. Since the optimum regimen remains inconclusive, we aimed to compare these treatments in terms of overall survival after tumour resection and in terms of grade 3-4 toxic effects with a systematic review and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed, trial registries, and related reviews and abstracts for randomised controlled trials comparing the above five treatments with each other or observation alone before April 30, 2013. We estimated relative hazard ratios (HRs) for death and relative odds ratios (ORs) for toxic effects among different therapies by combining HRs for death and survival durations and ORs for toxic effects of included trials. We assessed the effects of prognostic factors on survival benefits of adjuvant therapies with meta-regression. Findings Ten eligible articles reporting nine trials were included. Compared with observation, the HRs for death were 0.62 (95% credible interval 0.42-0. 88) for fluorouracil, 0.68 (0 . 44-1 . 07) for gemcitabine, 0.91 (0.55-1 . 46) for chemoradiation, 0.54 (0.15-1.80) for chemoradiation plus fl uorouracil, and 0 . 44 (0 . 10-1 . 81) for chemoradiation plus gemcitabine. The proportion of patients with positive lymph nodes was inversely associated with the survival benefit of adjuvant treatments. After adjustment for this factor, fl uorouracil (HR 0.65, 0.49-0.84) and gemcitabine (0.59, 0.41-0.83) improved survival compared with observation, whereas chemoradiation resulted in worse survival than fl uorouracil (1.69,1.12-2.54) or gemcitabine (1.86,1.04-3.23). Chemoradiation plus gemcitabine was ranked the most toxic, with significantly higher haematological toxic effects than second-ranked chemoradiation plus fl uorouracil (OR 13.33,1.01-169.36). Interpretation Chemotherapy with fl uorouracil or gemcitabine is the optimum adjuvant treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and reduces mortality after surgery by about a third. Chemoradiation plus chemotherapy is less effective in prolonging survival and is more toxic than chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1095 / 1103
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adjuvant treatment for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Parmar, Ambica
    Chaves-Porras, Jorge
    Saluja, Ronak
    Perry, Kaitlyn
    Rahmadian, Amanda P.
    Delos Santos, Seanthel
    Ko, Yoo-Joung
    Berry, Scott
    Doherty, Mark
    Chan, Kelvin K. W.
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2020, 145
  • [2] Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Xu, Jian-Bo
    Jiang, Bin
    Chen, Ya
    Qi, Fu-Zhen
    Zhang, Jian-Huai
    Yuan, Hang
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (46) : 81419 - 81429
  • [3] Clinical efficacy of adjuvant treatments for patients with resected biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Chen, Ye
    Zhang, Baoxia
    Liu, Chang
    Cao, Ye
    Lyu, Cheng
    Qiu, Meng
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [4] Adjuvant Treatments of Adult Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Jing, Mingyi
    Cai, Yi
    Shi, Jing
    Zhang, Xufan
    Zhu, Baohua
    Yuan, Fan
    Zhang, Jie
    Xiao, Min
    Chen, Mingling
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [5] Systematic review with network meta-analysis: adjuvant therapy for resected biliary tract cancer
    Zhu, G. -Q.
    Shi, K. -Q.
    You, J.
    Zou, H.
    Lin, Y. -Q.
    Wang, L. -R.
    Braddock, M.
    Chen, Y. -P.
    Zheng, M. -H.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 40 (07) : 759 - 770
  • [6] Optimal adjuvant therapy for resected hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review with network meta-analysis
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    Shi, Ke-Qing
    Yu, Hua-Jian
    He, Sun-Yue
    Braddock, Martin
    Zhou, Meng-Tao
    Chen, Yong-Ping
    Zheng, Ming-Hua
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2015, 6 (20) : 18151 - 18161
  • [7] Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    You, Jie
    Shi, Ke-Qing
    He, Sun-Yue
    Wang, Li-Ren
    Chen, Yong-Ping
    Braddock, Martin
    Zheng, Ming-Hua
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (01) : e379
  • [8] Moving the Target on the Optimal Adjuvant Strategy for Resected Pancreatic Cancers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Galvano, Antonio
    Castiglia, Marta
    Rizzo, Sergio
    Silvestris, Nicola
    Brunetti, Oronzo
    Vaccaro, Giovanni
    Gristina, Valerio
    Barraco, Nadia
    Bono, Marco
    Guercio, Giovanni
    Graceffa, Giuseppa
    Fulfaro, Fabio
    Gori, Stefania
    Bazan, Viviana
    Russo, Antonio
    [J]. CANCERS, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [9] Comparative effectiveness of adjuvant treatments for resected gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis
    Zhaolun Cai
    Yiqiong Yin
    Yuan Yin
    Chaoyong Shen
    Jian Wang
    Xiaonan Yin
    Zhixin Chen
    Ye Zhou
    Bo Zhang
    [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21 : 1031 - 1040
  • [10] Comparative effectiveness of adjuvant treatments for resected gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis
    Cai, Zhaolun
    Yin, Yiqiong
    Yin, Yuan
    Shen, Chaoyong
    Wang, Jian
    Yin, Xiaonan
    Chen, Zhixin
    Zhou, Ye
    Zhang, Bo
    [J]. GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 21 (06) : 1031 - 1040