Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations

被引:28
|
作者
Kiremitci, A. [1 ]
Apaslan, T. [1 ]
Gurgan, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
RESIN-BASED COMPOSITES; POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES;
D O I
10.2341/08-48
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: For decades, resin composites have been used with increasing frequency as posterior restorative materials, because of the demand for aesthetic restoration. This study evaluated the six-year clinical-performance of Filtek P60 (3M ESPE) packable composite restorations in combination with a one-bottle etch and rinse adhesive, Single Bond (3M ESPE), in Class 11 restorations. Methods: A total of 47 restorations were placed in the Class II cavity preparations (27 premolars and 20 molars) of 33 patients (22 female/11 male; mean age 34) by the same operator. The-restorations were evaluated by two examiners at baseline and 1, 2, 3 and 6 years according to the method developed by Ryge, which also is known as-the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The following characteristics were observed: marginal adaptation, anatomical form, surface texture, marginal discoloration, surface staining, post-operative sensitivity and secondary caries. The Chi-square and Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferromi adjustment were-used for statistical analysis (p=0.05). Results: All the restorations received Alpha scores at baseline assessment, except for one restoration, which showed post-operative sensitivity. At the three-year recall examination, two patients, with a total of three restorations, were not included. From baseline to three years, only two of the 44 restorations changed from Alpha to Bravo, for numerous reasons. At the six-year recall, 44 restorations were available for examination. The majority of restorations exhibited Alpha or Bravo scores for the evaluated criteria. No significant differences were found for any of the clinical criteria (p>0.05). Only two restorations needed to be repaired due to caries that began independently from the restorations. Three or four restorations showed slight surface staining and marginal discoloration. Conclusions: The clinical performance of the posterior composite restorations that were evaluated was acceptable after six years of service.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 17
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations
    Yazici, Ayse Ruya
    Kutuk, Zeynep Bilge
    Ergin, Esra
    Karahan, Sevilay
    Antonson, Sibel A.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (01) : 417 - 426
  • [2] Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations
    Ayse Ruya Yazici
    Zeynep Bilge Kutuk
    Esra Ergin
    Sevilay Karahan
    Sibel A. Antonson
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 417 - 426
  • [3] One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations
    Loguercio, AD
    Reis, A
    Rodrigues, LE
    Busato, ALS
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2001, 26 (05) : 427 - 434
  • [4] 3-Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations
    Loguercio, AD
    Reis, A
    Hernandez, PAG
    Macedo, RP
    Busato, ALS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2006, 33 (02) : 144 - 151
  • [5] A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations:: One-year report
    de Souza, FB
    Guimaräes, RP
    Silva, CHV
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 36 (01): : 41 - 48
  • [6] One-year clinical evaluation of five posterior packable composite resin restorations.
    Busato, ALS
    Loguercio, AS
    Reis, A
    Rodrigues, LE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B122 - B122
  • [7] Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations
    Summitt, JB
    Burgess, JO
    Berry, TG
    Robbins, JW
    Osborne, JW
    Haveman, CW
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2004, 29 (03) : 261 - 268
  • [8] Six-year evaluation of open-sandwich restorations.
    Andersson-Wenckert, IE
    van Dijken, JWV
    Kieri, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 469 - 469
  • [9] Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in Class-II restorations.
    Oberländer H.
    Hiller K.A.
    Thonemann B.
    Schmalz G.
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2001, 5 (2) : 102 - 107
  • [10] Clinical performance evaluation of a packable posterior composite in bulk-cured restorations
    Sarrett, DC
    Brooks, CN
    Rose, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 137 (01): : 71 - 80