A new and simple method for distinguishing complete from incomplete block through the cavotricuspid isthmus

被引:4
|
作者
Laurent, G [1 ]
Bourcier, A [1 ]
Bertaux, G [1 ]
Fromentin, S [1 ]
Fraison, M [1 ]
Gonzalez, S [1 ]
Saint Pierre, F [1 ]
Wolf, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Dijon, Dept Cardiol, Dijon, France
关键词
atrial flutter; catheter ablation; pacing manoeuvre;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-006-6085-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A complete line of block (CLOB) in the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is the endpoint of typical atrial flutter ablation. Before CTI block is obtained, a progressive CTI conduction delay due to an incomplete line of block (InLOB) can be difficult to distinguish from CLOB. The purpose of this study was to assess a new simple approach based on the changes in atrio-ventricular (AV) conduction delays during septal and lateral right atrial pacing, to distinguish a CLOB from an InLOB during typical atrial flutter (AFL) ablation. Methods and Results: Forty patients who presented an InLOB before a CLOB, and a stable (AV) conduction delay at 600 ms cycle length pacing (when in sinus rhythm), during AFL ablation were included in this study. A 24-pole mapping catheter was positioned so that 2 adjacent dipoles bracketed the targeted CTI line of block (LOB), with proximal dipoles lateral to the LOB and distal dipoles in the coronary sinus. Two pacing sites were lateral (position L1 and L2) and one was septal (position S) to the LOB, with locations L1 and S closest to the LOB. During L1, L2 and S site pacing, the delay between the pacing artefact and the peak of the R wave in a surface ECG (lead II) was measured. We measured the following conduction delays (mean +/- SD in ms), during InLOB versus CLOB: (L1 to R) 320.5 +/- 68.0 versus 367.0 +/- 62.0, p = 0.001; (L2 to R) 333.0 +/- 59.0 versus 338.0 +/- 62.0, p = 0.663, (S to R) 259.4 +/- 51.5 versus 247.1 +/- 55.5, p = 0.987. We calculated the following data during an InLOB versus a CLOB: (L1R-L2R) - 12.3 +/- 7 versus 20.2 +/- 12.7, p = 0.001; (L1R-SR) 51.1 +/- 21.5 versus 120.1 +/- 16.6, p < 0.05. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for CLOB with (L1R-SR > 94 ms) and with (L1R-L2R > 0 ms) were respectively; 100%, 98%, 98% and 100%. Conclusions: This study establishes that lateral versus septal right atrial pacing sites combined with the measure of AV conduction delay on a surface ECG can be useful to distinguish a CLOB from an InLOB during AFL ablation.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 182
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A New and Simple Method for Distinguishing Complete from Incomplete Block Through the Cavotricuspid Isthmus
    Gabriel Laurent
    Alexandra Bourcier
    Géraldine Bertaux
    Stéphane Fromentin
    Michel Fraison
    Stéphanie Gonzalez
    François Saint Pierre
    Jean Eric Wolf
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2005, 14 : 175 - 182
  • [2] A new and simple method for distinguishing complete from incomplete block through the cavotricuspid isthmus
    Laurent, G
    Bourcier, A
    Bertaux, G
    Fraison, M
    Duport, M
    Fromentin, S
    Didier, V
    Wolf, JE
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 281 - 281
  • [3] A simple and definite proof of complete cavotricuspid isthmus block
    Latcu, Decebal Gabriel
    Saoudi, Nadir
    EUROPACE, 2010, 12 (09): : 1211 - 1212
  • [4] What is the most accurate and simple method to assess block through the cavotricuspid isthmus?
    Shah, DC
    Jaïs, P
    Hocini, M
    Yamane, T
    Macle, L
    Choi, KJ
    Haïssaguerre, M
    Clementy, J
    CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIAS 2001, 2002, : 301 - 305
  • [5] Translesional Time to Determine Complete Bidirectional Block Across the Cavotricuspid Isthmus
    Thomas, George
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)
  • [6] The Distance From the Right Coronary Artery to the Cavotricuspid Isthmus is a Predictor of First-Pass Conductional Block of Cavotricuspid Isthmus by Cryoablation
    Nodera, Minoru
    Nehashi, Takeshi
    Yamada, Shinya
    Kaneshiro, Takashi
    Takeishi, Yasuchika
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [7] Incremental Pacing for the Diagnosis of Complete Cavotricuspid Isthmus Block During Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Flutter
    Bazan, Victor
    Marti-Almor, Julio
    Perez-Rodon, Jordi
    Bruguera, Jordi
    Gerstenfeld, Edward P.
    Callans, David J.
    Marchlinski, Francis E.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [8] Simple and novel technique to confirm complete mitral isthmus block
    Takigawa, Masateru
    Takahashi, Atsushi
    Tanaka, Yasuaki
    Martin, Claire A.
    Nakashima, Emiko
    Yamao, Kazuya
    Sagawa, Yuichiro
    Kuwahara, Taishi
    Okubo, Kenji
    Takahashi, Yoshihide
    Watari, Yuji
    Nakajima, Jun
    Takagi, Katsumasa
    Fujino, Tadashi
    Kimura, Shigeki
    Hikita, Hiroyuki
    Hirao, Kenzo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (10) : 1379 - 1387
  • [9] Reversal of local atrial electrogram polarity indicates complete bi-directional cavotricuspid isthmus block
    Tada, H
    Sticherling, C
    Oral, H
    Chough, SP
    Baker, RL
    Wasmer, KA
    Kim, MH
    Pelosi, F
    Michaud, GF
    Knight, BP
    Strickberger, SA
    Morady, F
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 621 - 621
  • [10] New-onset atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: identification of advanced interatrial block is key
    Enriquez, Andres
    Sarrias, Axel
    Villuendas, Roger
    Ali, Fariha Sadiq
    Conde, Diego
    Hopman, Wilma M.
    Redfearn, Damian P.
    Michael, Kevin
    Simpson, Christopher
    Bayes De Luna, Antoni
    Bayes-Genis, Antoni
    Baranchuk, Adrian
    EUROPACE, 2015, 17 (08): : 1289 - 1293