Only knowing in the situation calculus

被引:0
|
作者
Lakemeyer, G
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Actions depend crucially on what an agent knows and does not know. For example, an action may have a precondition that requires knowing the referent of a term, which is generally referred to as knowing who or knowing what. Alternatively, executing a sense action may be the result of realizing that the referent of a term is not known yet. The latter requires an agent to reason about all it knows about the world. This concept, also called only knowing, has been studied using possible-world semantics, yet only in the static case. One of the best understood action formalisms is the situation calculus. Moreover, it also comes equipped with a possible-world model of knowledge, which has led to deep insights into the relationship between action and knowledge. Adding only knowing to the situation calculus, which is the topic of this paper, turns out to be much more problematic than in the case of adding knowledge. It requires a reconstruction of the situation calculus itself by first developing a possible-world model of action and then interpreting situations explicitly as possible worlds. The properties of the situation calculus, which normally need to be stipulated axiomatically, are shown to be valid formulas in our model. More importantly, only knowing is fully integrated into the action formalism.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 25
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tableau calculus for only knowing and knowing at most
    Rosati, R
    [J]. AUTOMATED REASONING WITH ANALYTIC TABLEAUX AND RELATED METHODS, 2000, 1847 : 383 - 397
  • [2] Ability and Knowing How in the Situation Calculus
    Lespérance Y.
    Levesque H.J.
    Fangzhen L.I.N.
    Scherl R.B.
    [J]. Studia Logica, 2000, 66 (1) : 165 - 186
  • [3] A Sound and Complete Tableau Calculus for Reasoning about only Knowing and Knowing at Most
    Rosati R.
    [J]. Studia Logica, 2001, 69 (1) : 171 - 191
  • [4] KNOWING THE PARTIES AND THE SITUATION
    FUCHSBERG, A
    [J]. TRIAL, 1984, 20 (11): : 100 - 100
  • [5] Proslogion 6: ...if perceiving is only knowing or only for the sake of knowing...
    Otisk, Marek
    [J]. FILOSOFICKY CASOPIS, 2017, : 11 - 28
  • [6] Reconciling the event calculus with the situation calculus
    Kowalski, R
    Sadri, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING, 1997, 31 (1-3): : 39 - 58
  • [7] Inductive situation calculus
    Denecker, Marc
    Ternovska, Eugenia
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 171 (5-6) : 332 - 360
  • [8] Probabilistic situation calculus
    Mateus, P
    Pacheco, A
    Pinto, J
    Sernadas, A
    Sernadas, C
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 32 (1-4) : 393 - 431
  • [9] Probabilistic Situation Calculus
    Paulo Mateus
    António Pacheco
    Javier Pinto
    Amílcar Sernadas
    Cristina Sernadas
    [J]. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2001, 32 : 393 - 431
  • [10] Executability in the Situation Calculus
    Cerexhe, Timothy
    Pagnucco, Maurice
    [J]. AI 2011: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 7106 : 677 - 686