Retributivism In Extremis

被引：18
|
作者：
Husak, Douglas [1 ]
机构：
[1] Rutgers State Univ, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
来源：
LAW AND PHILOSOPHY | 2013年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词：
PUNISHMENT; KANT;
D O I：
10.1007/s10982-012-9145-2
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
I defend two objections to Tadros's views on punishment. First, I allege that his criticisms of retributivism are persuasive only against extreme versions that provide no justificatory place for instrumentalist objectives. His attack fails against a version of retributivism that recognizes a chasm between what offenders deserve and the allthings-considered permissibility of treating offenders as they deserve. Second, I critique Tadros's duty view - his alternative theory of punishment. Inter alia, I object that he derives principles from highly unusual examples of self-defense he subsequently tries to apply to ordinary cases of punishment.
引用
收藏
页码：3 / 31
页数：29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retributivism In Extremis
    Douglas Husak
    [J]. Law and Philosophy, 2013, 32 : 3 - 31
  • [2] IN EXTREMIS
    Gibbs, Jonathan
    [J]. TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 2017, (5947): : 22 - 22
  • [3] In Extremis
    Kirkpatrick, Patricia
    [J]. POETRY, 2012, 200 (01) : 5 - 5
  • [4] 'IN EXTREMIS'
    GROVES, P
    [J]. POETRY REVIEW, 1985, 75 (03): : 9 - 9
  • [5] IS RETRIBUTIVISM ANALYTIC
    PRIMORAC, I
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY, 1981, 56 (216) : 203 - 211
  • [6] 'In Extremis'
    Semanki, D
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND REVIEW-MIDDLEBURY SERIES, 2002, 23 (01): : 88 - 88
  • [7] IN EXTREMIS
    Moorehead, Caroline
    [J]. TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 2019, (6040): : 16 - 16
  • [8] In Extremis
    Munde, Christopher
    [J]. MASSACHUSETTS REVIEW, 2014, 55 (02): : 296 - 297
  • [9] 'In extremis'
    Maldonado, G
    [J]. ARTFORUM INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 43 (06): : 181 - 181
  • [10] RETRIBUTIVISM AND DETERRENCE
    EZORSKY, G
    [J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1978, 21 (01): : 103 - 104
12345