Comparison of Gaussian and Poisson Noise Models in a Hybrid Reference Spectrum and Principal Component Analysis Algorithm for Raman Spectroscopy

被引:3
|
作者
Van de Sompel, Dominique [1 ]
Garai, Ellis [1 ]
Zavaleta, Cristina [1 ]
Gambhir, Sanjiv S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, MIPS, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Raman spectroscopy; unmixing; deconvolution; principal component analysis; Bayesian probability; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; SCATTERING; NANOPARTICLES; SUBTRACTION; CALIBRATION; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1117/12.2005455
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Raman spectra are most commonly analyzed using the ordinary least squares (LS) method. However, LS is sensitive to variability in the spectra of the analyte and background materials. We previously addressed this problem by successfully proposing a novel hybrid least squares and principal components (HLP) algorithm. HLP extended LS by allowing the reference spectra to vary in accordance with the principal components observed in calibration sets. Previously, HLP assumed zero-mean Gaussian measurement noise. In this work, we show that the noise in fact follows a Poisson distribution, and update the mathematical framework of our algorithm accordingly. Since the name 'least squares' referred to the Gaussian noise model, we also generalize the name of our algorithm to the Hybrid reference Spectrum and Principal component analysis (HSP) algorithm. The performance of the Gaussian and Poisson noise models is compared using both simulated and measured spectra. The simulated spectra were computed by adding various concentrations of Raman-enhanced gold-silica nanoparticles to three different backgrounds (paraffin, glass and quartz). The measured spectra were acquired from a serial dilution of gold-silica nanoparticles placed on an excised pig colon. For the simulated spectra, the Poisson model consistently outperformed the Gaussian model, on average reducing the mean absolute concentration error as well as its standard deviation by similar to 15-20%. For the measured data, the Gaussian and Poisson noise models yielded similar concentration estimates. Both HSP algorithms also outperformed the LS algorithm, indicating that the incorporation of the principal components yields a larger improvement in accuracy than the optimization of the noise model. Further comparison between the two HSP algorithms (with Gaussian and Poisson noise models) was precluded by a lack of precise ground truth knowledge of the nanoparticle concentrations on the colon tissue. However, the simulation results already demonstrated that the optimization of noise models can improve the detection accuracy of Raman spectroscopy, and that it may therefore be an important consideration in future high-sensitivity Raman imaging studies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of noise models in a hybrid reference spectrum and principal components analysis algorithm for Raman spectroscopy
    Van de Sompel, Dominique
    Garai, Ellis
    Zavaleta, Cristina
    Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY, 2013, 44 (06) : 841 - 856
  • [2] A Hybrid Least Squares and Principal Component Analysis Algorithm for Raman Spectroscopy
    Van de Sompel, Dominique
    Garai, Ellis
    Zavaleta, Cristina
    Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (06):
  • [3] A Hybrid Least Squares and Principal Component Analysis Algorithm for Raman Spectroscopy
    Van de Sompel, Dominique
    Garai, Ellis
    Zavaleta, Cristina
    Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam
    [J]. 2011 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2011, : 6971 - 6974
  • [4] Blind spectral deconvolution algorithm for Raman spectrum with Poisson noise
    Liu, Hai
    Zhang, Zhaoli
    Sun, Jianwen
    Liu, Sanya
    [J]. PHOTONICS RESEARCH, 2014, 2 (06): : 168 - 171
  • [5] Principal Component Analysis of Honey Spectrum Obtained from Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy
    Raduan, M. F.
    Mansor, W.
    Lee, Khuan Y.
    Radzol, A. R. Mohd
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR INNOVATION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND LIFE SCIENCES, ICIBEL2015, 2016, 56 : 283 - 286
  • [6] PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS IN DECOMPOSABLE GAUSSIAN GRAPHICAL MODELS
    Wiesel, Ami
    Hero, Alfred O., III
    [J]. 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1- 8, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 1537 - 1540
  • [7] Principal component analysis to enhance enantioselective Raman spectroscopy
    Rullich, Claudia C.
    Kiefer, Johannes
    [J]. ANALYST, 2019, 144 (06) : 2080 - 2086
  • [8] Toxins' classification through Raman spectroscopy with principal component analysis
    Mozhaeva, Vera
    Kudryavtsev, Denis
    Prokhorov, Kirill
    Utkin, Yuri
    Gudkov, Sergey
    Garnov, Sergey
    Kasheverov, Igor
    Tsetlin, Victor
    [J]. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY, 2022, 278
  • [9] DIAGNOSIS OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER BY RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
    Wang, Q. Y.
    Xing, L. Y.
    Yin, X. Y.
    Li, Z. G.
    Shan, P.
    Hu, S.
    Ma, Z. H.
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 122 : 9 - 9
  • [10] Investigation of sport supplements quality by Raman spectroscopy and principal component analysis
    Almeida, Mariana R.
    de Souza, Leticia P.
    Cesar, Rodrigo S.
    Sousa, Rafael A.
    Izumi, Celly M. S.
    [J]. VIBRATIONAL SPECTROSCOPY, 2016, 87 : 1 - 7