Deep learning in CT image segmentation of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Yang, Chongze [1 ]
Qin, Lan-hui [1 ]
Xie, Yu-en [1 ]
Liao, Jin-yuan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang, Peoples R China
[2] Gaungxi Med Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Early Prevent & Treatment Reg High Freque, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cervical neoplasm; Deep learning; Segmentation; Meta-analysis; Computed tomography; Radiotherapy; GUIDED ADAPTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY; AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; RISK; ORGANS; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-022-02148-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background This paper attempts to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning (DLs) models for cervical cancer CT image segmentation. Methods Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of science. The literature on DLs for cervical cancer CT image segmentation were included, a meta-analysis was performed on the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of the segmentation results of the included DLs models. We also did subgroup analyses according to the size of the sample, type of segmentation (i.e., two dimensions and three dimensions), and three organs at risk (i.e., bladder, rectum, and femur). This study was registered in PROSPERO prior to initiation (CRD42022307071). Results A total of 1893 articles were retrieved and 14 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled effect of DSC score of clinical target volume (CTV), bladder, rectum, femoral head were 0.86(95%CI 0.84 to 0.87), 0.91(95%CI 0.89 to 0.93), 0.83(95%CI 0.79 to 0.88), and 0.92(95%CI 0.91to 0.94), respectively. For the performance of segmented CTV by two dimensions (2D) and three dimensions (3D) model, the DSC score value for 2D model was 0.87 (95%CI 0.85 to 0.90), while the DSC score for 3D model was 0.85 (95%CI 0.82 to 0.87). As for the effect of the capacity of sample on segmentation performance, no matter whether the sample size is divided into two groups: greater than 100 and less than 100, or greater than 150 and less than 150, the results show no difference (P > 0.05). Four papers reported the time for segmentation from 15 s to 2 min. Conclusion DLs have good accuracy in automatic segmentation of CT images of cervical cancer with a less time consuming and have good prospects for future radiotherapy applications, but still need public high-quality databases and large-scale research verification.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep learning in CT image segmentation of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chongze Yang
    Lan-hui Qin
    Yu-en Xie
    Jin-yuan Liao
    [J]. Radiation Oncology, 17
  • [2] Deep learning in image-based breast and cervical cancer detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peng Xue
    Jiaxu Wang
    Dongxu Qin
    Huijiao Yan
    Yimin Qu
    Samuel Seery
    Yu Jiang
    Youlin Qiao
    [J]. npj Digital Medicine, 5
  • [3] Deep learning in image-based breast and cervical cancer detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xue, Peng
    Wang, Jiaxu
    Qin, Dongxu
    Yan, Huijiao
    Qu, Yimin
    Seery, Samuel
    Jiang, Yu
    Qiao, Youlin
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 5 (01)
  • [4] Deep learning image segmentation approaches for malignant bone lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rich, Joseph M.
    Bhardwaj, Lokesh N.
    Shah, Aman
    Gangal, Krish
    Rapaka, Mohitha S.
    Oberai, Assad A.
    Fields, Brandon K. K.
    Matcuk Jr, George R.
    Duddalwar, Vinay A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 3
  • [5] Systematic review and meta-analysis of deep learning applications in computed tomography lung cancer segmentation
    Wang, Ting -Wei
    Hong, Jia-Sheng
    Huang, Jing-Wen
    Liao, Chien -Yi
    Lu, Chia-Feng
    Wu, Yu-Te
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 197
  • [6] The effect of deep learning reconstruction on abdominal CT densitometry and image quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    van Stiphout, J. Abel
    Driessen, Jan
    Koetzier, Lennart R.
    Ruules, Lara B.
    Willemink, Martin J.
    Heemskerk, Jan W. T.
    van der Molen, Aart J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (05) : 2921 - 2929
  • [7] The effect of deep learning reconstruction on abdominal CT densitometry and image quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    J. Abel van Stiphout
    Jan Driessen
    Lennart R. Koetzier
    Lara B. Ruules
    Martin J. Willemink
    Jan W. T. Heemskerk
    Aart J. van der Molen
    [J]. European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 2921 - 2929
  • [8] Deep learning assisted segmentation of the lumbar intervertebral disc: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Aobo
    Zou, Congying
    Yuan, Shuo
    Fan, Ning
    Du, Peng
    Wang, Tianyi
    Zang, Lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [9] Screening for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peirson L.
    Fitzpatrick-Lewis D.
    Ciliska D.
    Warren R.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 2 (1)
  • [10] Deep learning techniques in CT image reconstruction and segmentation: a systematic literature review
    Devi, Manju
    Singh, Sukhdip
    Tiwari, Shailendra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (5-10) : 790 - 828