Developing measures to audit welfare of cattle and pigs at slaughter

被引:20
|
作者
Grandin, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
animal welfare; audits; cattle; pigs; slaughter; stunning; TO-SENSIBILITY PROBLEMS; VOCALIZATION; STRESS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.7120/09627286.21.3.351
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Since 1999, animal welfare auditing programmes that utilise five numerically scored core criteria have been used successfully by major restaurant chains to monitor animal welfare in slaughter plants. They had to achieve specific numerical scores in order to remain on the approved supplier list. The five numerically scored criteria (critical control points) are: i) Percentage of animals that fall down during handling; ii) Percentage of animals moved with an electric prod; iii) Percentage of cattle or pigs vocalising in the stunning box or restrainer; iv) Percentage of animals stunned effectively with one application of the stunner; and v) Percentage rendered insensible when hoisted to the bleed rail (has to be 100% to pass the audit). Audit data collected in 2010 by two restaurant companies in 30 beef plants, indicated that 77% of them effectively stunned 100 to 99% of the cattle with a single shot from a captive-bolt gun. All 30 plants passed the audit, which required 95% of more of the cattle stunned with one shot. In eight pork plants with electric stunning, the tongs were placed correctly on 100% of the pigs held in a V-conveyor restrainer. In 95% of the beef plants, and 86% of 25 pork plants, 100% of the animals fell during unloading, movement in the lairage and during handling in the stunning area. In 81% of the beef plants and 77% of the pork plants, 5% or less of the animals were moved with an electric prod. The percentage of cattle vocalising in the stun box and during movement into the stun box was 3% or less in all the plants except one. All scores are per animal, an animal is stunned correctly in the first shot, or not stunned correctly. It either vocalises or it is silent. A passing score is required on all five of the numerically scored core criteria. Due to financial and time constrains, the same auditor assesses both welfare and food safety. Workshops for training auditors last 1.5 days and include two plant visits.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 356
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Welfare of pigs at slaughter
    Nielsen, Soren Saxmose
    Alvarez, Julio
    Bicout, Dominique Joseph
    Calistri, Paolo
    Depner, Klaus
    Drewe, Julian Ashley
    Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
    Rojas, Jose Luis Gonzales
    Schmidt, Christian Gortazar
    Michel, Virginie
    Chueca, Miguel Angel Miranda
    Roberts, Helen Clare
    Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
    Spoolder, Hans
    Stahl, Karl
    Viltrop, Arvo
    Winckler, Christoph
    Candiani, Denise
    Fabris, Chiara
    Van der Stede, Yves
    Velarde, Antonio
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2020, 18 (06)
  • [2] Welfare of cattle at slaughter
    Nielsen, Soren Saxmose
    Alvarez, Julio
    Bicout, Dominique Joseph
    Calistri, Paolo
    Depner, Klaus
    Drewe, Julian Ashley
    Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
    Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
    Schmidt, Christian Gortazar
    Michel, Virginie
    Miranda Chueca, Miguel Angel
    Roberts, Helen Clare
    Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
    Spoolder, Hans
    Stahl, Karl
    Velarde, Antonio
    Viltrop, Arvo
    Candiani, Denise
    Van der Stede, Yves
    Winckler, Christoph
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2020, 18 (11)
  • [3] Welfare implications of cattle slaughter
    McGinnity, P
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1996, 138 (14) : 338 - 338
  • [4] CATTLE WELFARE Rib fractures in slaughter cattle
    Blowey, Roger
    Bell, Nick
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2014, 175 (09) : 231 - 231
  • [5] Animal welfare in terms of lung health in cattle, pigs, sheep and goats assessed at slaughter
    Valkova, Lenka
    Voslarova, Eva
    Conte, Francesca
    Vecerek, Vladimir
    [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA BRNO, 2024, 93 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [6] The welfare of slaughter pigs during transport
    Warriss, PD
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 1998, 7 (04) : 365 - 381
  • [7] WELFARE ASPECTS OF THE SLAUGHTER OF RECUMBENT CATTLE
    HOFSCHULTE, B
    [J]. TIERARZTLICHE UMSCHAU, 1988, 43 (03): : 170 - &
  • [8] Welfare of cattle in terms of slaughter methods
    Florek, Mariusz
    [J]. MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA-VETERINARY MEDICINE-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2014, 70 (05): : 274 - 279
  • [9] Welfare of finisher pigs during transportation to slaughter
    Ellis, M.
    Ritter, M.
    Anil, L.
    Butler, D.
    Curtis, S.
    Dewey, C.
    Driessen, B.
    Hill, J.
    Salak-Johnson, J.
    McGlone, J.
    Stull, C.
    Johnson, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2005, 88 : 259 - 259
  • [10] The effect of the sticking method on the welfare of slaughter pigs
    Anil, MH
    Whittington, PE
    McKinstry, JL
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2000, 55 (03) : 315 - 319