Environmental Impact Assessment of Land Use Planning Based on Ecosystem Services Valuation in Xingguo County

被引:2
|
作者
Xie Hualin [1 ]
Wang Jinzheng [1 ]
Hu Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Poyang Lake Ecoecon, Nanchang City, Peoples R China
关键词
Land use planning; ecosystem services valuation; EIA; Xingguo County;
D O I
10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.251
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper describes a case study of environmental impact assessment for land use planning (2006-2020) based on ecosystem services valuation in Xingguo County. The results from the study are as follows. In addition to the decline of ecosystem services valuation of water and unused land during the planning period in Xingguo County, the other various land use types are increasing. The rising range of fields is 61.49% which is the biggest rising range. The new program of land use planning carried out will make the ecosystem services valuation of other types of land use rise from 5.815 billion yuan in 2006 to 5.833 billion yuan in 2020 in Xingguo County, with a net increase of 18million yuan. The valuation of ecosystem services per capita decreases from 7,958 yuan in 2006 to 6,598 yuan in 2020. All of these results indicate that as the population growing continuously, the valuation of ecosystem services per capita relative to the total valuation of ecosystem services shows a negative growth trend. If the valuation of ecosystem services per capita is required to keep bigger or equal to the status quo, the land planning scheme should be further refined and modified. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B. V. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of National University of Singapore.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecosystem services-based land planning for environmental impact avoidance
    Nin, Mariana
    Soutullo, Alvaro
    Rodriguez-Gallego, Lorena
    Di Minin, Enrico
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 17 : 172 - 184
  • [2] Land-use Dynamic and Ecosystem Services Valuation: Guidelines for Environmental Policies
    Andrade, Daniel Caixeta
    Romeiro, Ademar Ribeiro
    Ramos Fasiaben, Maria do Carmo
    Garcia, Junior Ruiz
    [J]. DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2012, 25 : 53 - 71
  • [3] Environmental impact valuation using ecosystem services
    Mihaly, Dombi
    [J]. TER ES TARSADALOM, 2012, 26 (02): : 40 - 56
  • [4] A research agenda for ecosystem services in American environmental and land use planning
    BenDor, Todd K.
    Spurlock, Danielle
    Woodruff, Sierra C.
    Olander, Lydia
    [J]. CITIES, 2017, 60 : 260 - 271
  • [5] Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes
    Soloviy, Ihor
    Kuryltsiv, Roman
    Hernik, Jozef
    Kryshenyk, Nadiia
    Kuleshnyk, Taras
    [J]. FORESTS, 2021, 12 (11):
  • [6] Valuation of Land-Use/Land-Cover-Based Ecosystem Services in Afghanistan-An Assessment of the Past and Future
    Najmuddin, Omaid
    Li, Zhihui
    Khan, Rabnawaz
    Zhuang, Weiqing
    [J]. LAND, 2022, 11 (11)
  • [7] Assessment of historical and future land-use-land-cover changes and their impact on valuation of ecosystem services in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal
    Shrestha, Manish
    Acharya, Suwash Chandra
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 32 (13) : 3731 - 3742
  • [8] Environmental liability: A missing use for ecosystem services valuation
    Phelps, Jacob
    Jones, Carol Adaire
    Pendergrass, John A.
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (39) : E5359 - E5359
  • [9] Enhancing Water Ecosystem Services Using Environmental Zoning in Land Use Planning
    Anjinho, Phelipe da Silva
    Barbosa, Mariana Abibi Guimaraes Araujo
    Peponi, Angeliki
    Duarte, Goncalo
    Branco, Paulo
    Ferreira, Maria Teresa
    Mauad, Frederico Fabio
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (11)
  • [10] A conceptual framework for environmental flows assessment based on ecosystem services and their economic valuation
    Gopal, Brij
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 21 : 53 - 58