Five Degree Internal Conical Connection and Marginal Bone Stability around Subcrestal Implants: A Retrospective Analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Lops, Diego [1 ]
Stocchero, Michele [2 ]
Jones, Jason Motta [3 ]
Freni, Alessandro
Palazzolo, Antonino [1 ]
Romeo, Eugenio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Dent Clin, I-20142 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Neurosci, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[3] Humanitas Univ, Dept Oral Surg, Dent Clin, I-20089 Milan, Italy
关键词
dental implant; marginal bone loss; retrospective studies; subcrestal implant placement; MORSE TAPER CONNECTION; SINGLE-TOOTH IMPLANTS; ABUTMENT INTERFACE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; LEVEL; PLACEMENT; HARD; PRESERVATION; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.3390/ma13143123
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: There is limited information on the effect of the connection between subcrestally placed implants and abutments on marginal bone levels. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate marginal bone levels after definitive prosthesis delivery around implants with an internal 5 degrees conical connection placed in a subcrestal position. Materials and methods: Patients treated with fixed prostheses supported by implants placed at a subcrestal level between 2012 and 2018 were recalled for a follow-up examination. All implants had 5 degrees internal conical connection with platform switching. Radiographic marginal bone level (MBL) was measured. MBL change between prosthetic delivery (t(0)) and follow-up examination (t(1)) was calculated. A multiple regression model was performed to identify the most significant predictors on MBL change. Results: Ninety-three patients and 410 implants, with a mean follow-up of 2.72 +/- 1.31 years, were examined. Mean MBL was -1.09 +/- 0.65 mm and -1.00 +/- 0.37 mm at t(0)and t(1), respectively, with a mean bone remodeling of 0.09 +/- 0.68 mm. An implant's vertical position in relation to the bone crest, the year of follow up and the presence of type-2 controlled diabetes were demonstrated to be influencing factors for MBL modifications. Conclusions: Subcrestally placed implants with platform switching and internal conical connection maintained stable bone levels over a mean follow-up of more than 2 years. How a tight internal conical connection between abutment and implant may contribute to this clinical evidence should be more deeply investigated. MBL variations seem to be mostly influenced by an implant's vertical position and presence of type-2 controlled diabetes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study
    Palacios-Garzon, Natalia
    Mauri-Obradors, Elisabeth
    Ayuso-Montero, Raul
    Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
    Anglada-Cantarell, Jose Maria
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (10)
  • [2] Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study
    Sargolzaie, Naser
    Zarch, Hosein Hoseini
    Arab, Hamidreza
    Koohestani, Tahereh
    Ramandi, Mahdiye Fasihi
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2022, 48 (03) : 159 - 166
  • [3] Marginal bone level around conical connection tapered implants with platform switching: A multicenter retrospective study at 14 months follow-up
    Ekstein, J.
    Tandelich, M.
    Nart, J.
    Calvo Guirado, J. L.
    Shapira, L.
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2016, 8 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [4] Marginal Bone Loss around Implants with Internal Hexagonal and Internal Conical Connections: A 12-Month Randomized Pilot Study
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Concha-Jeronimo, Ada
    Lopez-Chaichio, Lucia
    Rodriguez-Alvarez, Roque
    Sanchez-Fernandez, Elena
    Padial-Molina, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22)
  • [5] Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with External Connection versus Internal Conical Connection Prior to Prosthetic Loading. A Randomized Clinical Study
    Palacios-Garzon, Natalia
    Ayuso-Montero, Raul
    Jane-Salas, Enric
    Anglada-Cantarell, Jose Maria
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose
    COATINGS, 2020, 10 (11) : 1 - 17
  • [6] Do Platform Switching Together with Subcrestal Placement have a Benefit on Marginal Bone Levels Around Dental Implants?
    Agrali, Omer Birkan
    Elemek, Eser
    Dincer, Janberd
    Kigili, Ahmet
    Cilingir, Altug
    Kuru, Leyla
    Almas, Khalid
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (02): : 80 - 84
  • [7] Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study (vol 48, pg 159, 2022)
    Sargolzaie, Naser
    Zarch, Hosein Hoseini
    Arab, Hamidreza
    Koohestani, Tahereh
    Ramandi, Mahdiye Fasihi
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2022, 48 (04) : 245 - 245
  • [8] A 3-Year Prospective Study on Radiographic Marginal Bone Evaluation Around Platform-Shifting Implants with Internal Conical Connections
    Ogino, Yoichiro
    Matsushita, Yasuyuki
    Sasaki, Masanori
    Ayukawa, Yasunori
    Koyano, Kiyoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (03) : 574 - 580
  • [9] Stress analysis on the bone around five different dental implants
    Rajaai, SM
    Khorrami-mehr, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4: BUILDING NEW BRIDGES AT THE FRONTIERS OF ENGINEERING AND MEDICINE, 2001, 23 : 2995 - 2997
  • [10] Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss Around Axial and Tilted Implants: A Retrospective CBCT Analysis of Up to 24 Months
    Bruschi, Ernesto
    Manicone, Paolo Francesco
    De Angelis, Paolo
    Papetti, Laura
    Pastorino, Roberta
    D'Addona, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 39 (05) : 675 - +