Contract farming and smallholder incentives to produce high quality: experimental evidence from the Vietnamese dairy sector

被引:70
|
作者
Saenger, Christoph [1 ]
Qaim, Matin [2 ]
Torero, Maximo [3 ]
Viceisza, Angelino [3 ]
机构
[1] European Bank Reconstruct & Dev, Off Chief Economist, London EC2A 2JN, England
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20006 USA
关键词
C93; O13; Q13; Smallholders; High-value products; Contract farming; Vietnam; Field experiment; RISK; TOURNAMENTS; PARTICIPATION; PREFERENCES; MARKETS; IMPACTS; SCALE; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12012
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
In emerging markets for high-value food products in developing countries, processing companies search for efficient ways to source raw material of high quality. One widely embraced approach is contract farming. But relatively little is known about the appropriate design of financial incentives in a small farm context. We use the example of the Vietnamese dairy sector to analyze the effectiveness of existing contracts between a processor and smallholder farmers in terms of incentivizing the production of high quality milk. A framed field experiment is conducted to evaluate the impact of two incentive instruments, a price penalty for low quality and a bonus for consistent high quality milk, on farmers' investment in quality-improving inputs. Statistical analysis suggests that the penalty drives farmers into higher input use, resulting in better output quality. The bonus payment generates even higher quality milk. We also find that input choice levels depend on farmers' socio-economic characteristics such as wealth, while individual risk preferences seem to be less important. Implications for the design of contracts with smallholders are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 308
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Contract farming led by a seed enterprise and incentives to produce high quality: Which contract design performs best?
    Xie, Zuomiao
    Yuan, Shiqi
    Zhu, Jinjing
    Li, Weiming
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2023, 39 (04) : 1173 - 1198
  • [2] Effects of dairy contract farming on the smallholder farmer income: a case from dairy farming in Ethiopia
    Gelata, Fikiru Temesgen
    Han, Jiqin
    Tekalegn, Tsion
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [3] Inclusiveness of contract farming along the vertical coordination continuum: Evidence from the Vietnamese rice sector
    Ba, Helene A.
    de Mey, Yann
    Thoron, Sylvie
    Demont, Matty
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 87
  • [4] Smallholder Participation in Contract Farming: Comparative Evidence from Five Countries
    Barrett, Christopher B.
    Bachke, Maren E.
    Bellemare, Marc F.
    Michelson, Hope C.
    Narayanan, Sudha
    Walker, Thomas F.
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 40 (04) : 715 - 730
  • [5] Does contract farming arrangement improve smallholder tobacco productivity? Evidence from Zimbabwe
    Pangapanga-Phiri, Innocent
    Mungatana, Eric
    Mhondoro, Gwenzi
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [6] Determinants of Smallholder Farmers' Marketing Channel Choice: Evidence from the Vietnamese Rice Sector
    Thai Thuy Pham
    Theuvsen, Ludwig
    Otter, Verena
    ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2019, 33 (03) : 281 - 300
  • [7] Does Contract Farming Improve Income of Smallholder Avocado Farmers? Evidence from Sidama Region of Ethiopia
    Legesse, Tibebu
    Gensa, Mesfin
    Alemu, Abera
    Ashebir, Aneteneh
    Ganewo, Zerhun
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [8] Time versus State in Insurance: Experimental Evidence from Contract Farming in Kenya
    Casaburi, Lorenzo
    Willis, Jack
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 108 (12): : 3778 - 3813
  • [9] Impact of dairy contract farming adoption on household resilience to food insecurity evidence from Ethiopia
    Gelata, Fikiru Temesgen
    Han, Jiqin
    Limo, Shadrack Kipkogei
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2024, 33
  • [10] The Potency of Quality Incentives: Evidence from the Indonesian Dairy Value ChainJEL codes
    Treurniet, Mark
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 103 (05) : 1661 - 1678