Efficacy of luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone in intrauterine insemination: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:31
|
作者
Miralpeix, Ester [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalez-Comadran, Mireia [1 ]
Sola, Ivan [3 ,4 ]
Manau, Dolors [5 ,7 ]
Carreras, Ramon [1 ,2 ]
Checa, Miguel A. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[3] IIB St Pau, Inst Biomed Res, Iberoamer Cochrane Ctr, Barcelona, Spain
[4] CIBER Epidemiol Salud Publ, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Ctr Infertilidad & Reprod Humana, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Inst Invest Biomed August Pi I Sunyer IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Progesterone; Luteal phase support; Intrauterine insemination; Randomized controlled trial; CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION; PREGNANCY RATES; CLOMIPHENE CITRATE; CYCLES; GONADOTROPIN; IVF; LETROZOLE; WOMEN; HMG;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-013-0127-6
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
To evaluate the efficacy of luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone in women undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing supplementation of luteal phase with vaginal progesterone among women undergoing IUI versus a control group were included. The main outcome assessed was live birth rate. Five RCT met the inclusion criteria. In all 1,271 patients were included (951 IUI cycles in the progesterone group, 935 in the control group). Women treated with vaginal progesterone achieved significantly higher live birth rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.94, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.36 to 2.77,), and clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.14 to 1.76) as compared with controls. In the subgroup analysis per stimulation protocol, this beneficial effect of receiving progesterone was only observed in the group stimulated with gonadotropins (RR 2.28, 95 % CI 1.49 to 3.51), compared to the group stimulated with clomiphene citrate (CC) (RR 1.30, 95 % CI 0.68 to 2.50). No differences were observed in the miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates. The supplementation of luteal phase with vaginal progesterone significantly increases live birth among women undergoing IUI when receiving gonadotropins for ovulation induction. Women receiving CC to induce ovulation do not seem to benefit from this treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 100
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone in intrauterine insemination: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ester Miralpeix
    Mireia González-Comadran
    Ivan Solà
    Dolors Manau
    Ramon Carreras
    Miguel A. Checa
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2014, 31 : 89 - 100
  • [2] The efficacy and safety of luteal phase support with progesterone following ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Casarramona, G.
    Lalmahomed, T.
    Lemmen, C. H. C.
    Eijkemans, M. J. C.
    Broekmans, F. J. M.
    Cantineau, A. E. P.
    Drechsel, K. C. E.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [3] Progesterone luteal support after ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hill, Micah J.
    Whitcomb, Brian W.
    Lewis, Terrence D.
    Wu, Mae
    Terry, Nancy
    DeCherney, Alan H.
    Levens, Eric D.
    Propst, Anthony M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (05) : 1373 - +
  • [4] Progesterone luteal support after ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Green, Katherine A.
    Zolton, Jessica R.
    Schermerhorn, Sophia M. V.
    Lewis, Terrence D.
    Healy, Mae W.
    Terry, Nancy
    DeCherney, Alan H.
    Hill, Micah J.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 107 (04) : 924 - 933.e5
  • [5] PROGESTERONE LUTEAL SUPPORT FOLLOWING OVULATION INDUCTION AND INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION CYCLES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Hill, M. J.
    Whitcomb, B. W.
    Lewis, T. D.
    Levens, E. D.
    DeCherney, A. H.
    Propst, A. M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S301 - S301
  • [6] Comparison of oral dydrogesterone and vaginal micronized progesterone for luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination
    Tas, Mustafa
    Uludag, Semih Zeki
    Aygen, Mustafa Ercan
    Sahin, Yilmaz
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 36 (01) : 77 - 80
  • [7] Vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in IVF: a systematic review
    Marx, T.
    Diedrich, K.
    Griesinger, G.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 : I129 - I130
  • [8] Oral dydrogesterone vs. micronized vaginal progesterone as luteal phase support in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Griesinger, G.
    Tournaye, H.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 289 - 290
  • [9] Dydrogesterone as an oral alternative to vaginal progesterone for IVF luteal phase support: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
    Griesinger, Georg
    Blockeel, Christophe
    Kahler, Elke
    Pexman-Fieth, Claire
    Olofsson, Jan, I
    Driessen, Stefan
    Tournaye, Herman
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (11):
  • [10] Vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    Messini, Christina I.
    Papanikolaou, Evangelos G.
    Mauri, Davide
    Tzioras, Spyridon
    Badawy, Ahmed
    Messinis, Ioannis E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (06) : 2083 - 2087