A Hybrid Approach Based on Statistical Method and Meta-heuristic Optimization Algorithm for Coastal Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment

被引:15
|
作者
Bordbar, Mojgan [1 ]
Neshat, Aminreza [1 ]
Javadi, Saman [1 ]
Shahdany, Seied Mehdy Hashemy [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Fac Nat Resources & Environm, Sci & Res Branch, Dept GIS RS, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Coll Abouraihan, Dept Irrigat & Drainage, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Coastal aquifer; Frequency ratio; GALDIT index; Genetic algorithm; GIS; GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY; SEAWATER INTRUSION; FREQUENCY RATIO; GALDIT METHOD; DRASTIC MODEL; SALTWATER INTRUSION; PLAIN AQUIFER; RISK; AREA; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s10666-021-09754-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the major shortcomings with GALDIT model is the difficulty in specifying numerical constant values for the rating and weighting system of parameters of interest. The frequency ratio (FR) and genetic algorithm (GA) methods were applied in this research for the first time to improve the rates and weights of the GALDIT model. FR model was used to modify the rates of this model. Additionally, genetic algorithm was used to optimize the weights of GALDIT model based on the hydrological characteristics of the aquifer and the values of TDS parameter. The correlation between hybrid models of GALDIT-FR and GALDIT-GA were obtained as 0.69 and 0.61, respectively, while this correlation was increased up to 0.76 after combining the rates modified by FR statistical method and optimal weights of the genetic algorithm. The results of this model showed that the northwest and west parts of the study area have the highest vulnerability to seawater intrusion. So, it was concluded that a combination of meta-heuristic algorithm and statistical method provides more accurate result in the study region.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 338
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Hybrid Approach Based on Statistical Method and Meta-heuristic Optimization Algorithm for Coastal Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment
    Mojgan Bordbar
    Aminreza Neshat
    Saman Javadi
    Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany
    [J]. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2021, 26 : 325 - 338
  • [2] Meta-heuristic algorithms in optimizing GALDIT framework: A comparative study for coastal aquifer vulnerability assessment
    Bordbar, Mojgan
    Neshat, Aminreza
    Javadi, Saman
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Aghamohammadi, Hossein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 585
  • [3] Scheduling Optimization on Takeout Delivery Based on Hybrid Meta-heuristic Algorithm
    Sheng, Wen
    Shao, Qianqian
    Tong, Hengxing
    Peng, Jianfeng
    [J]. 2021 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (ICACI), 2021, : 372 - 377
  • [4] A hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm for optimization of crew scheduling
    Azadeh, A.
    Farahani, M. Hosseinabadi
    Eivazy, H.
    Nazari-Shirkouhi, S.
    Asadipour, G.
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (01) : 158 - 164
  • [5] A novel hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm for optimization problems
    Gai, Wendong
    Qu, Chengzhi
    Liu, Jie
    Zhang, Jing
    [J]. SYSTEMS SCIENCE & CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2018, 6 (03) : 64 - 73
  • [6] Resource provisioning optimization in fog computing: a hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm approach
    Usha, Vadde
    Rao, T. K. Rama Krishna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [7] A hybrid meta-heuristic method for continuous engineering optimization
    Csebfalvi, Aniko
    [J]. PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2009, 53 (02): : 93 - 100
  • [8] Intelligent accounting optimization method based on meta-heuristic algorithm and CNN
    Dong, Yanrui
    [J]. PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2024, 10
  • [9] A Novel Hybrid Meta-Heuristic Algorithm Based on the Cross-Entropy Method and Firefly Algorithm for Global Optimization
    Li, Guocheng
    Liu, Pei
    Le, Chengyi
    Zhou, Benda
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2019, 21 (05)
  • [10] Hybrid meta-heuristic VM load balancing optimization approach
    Yadav, Mala
    Gupta, Sachin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION & OPTIMIZATION SCIENCES, 2020, 41 (02): : 577 - 586