Should Adenocarcinoma of Cervix be Treated Differently to Squamous Cell Carcinoma?

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Ming Yin [1 ]
Rajasooriyar, Chrishanthi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas [1 ,4 ]
Narayan, Kailash [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol & Canc Imaging, Gynae Oncol Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Teaching Hosp, Jaffna, Sri Lanka
[3] Tellipalai Trail Canc Hosp, Jaffna, Sri Lanka
[4] Univ Queensland, Rural Clin Sch, Fac Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] ICON Canc Ctr, East Melbourne, Australia
关键词
Cervix cancer; Squamous carcinoma; Adenocarcinoma;
D O I
10.1007/s40944-021-00503-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and patterns of failure, in patients with SCC and ADC of cervix treated with definitive radiotherapy and to determine whether ADC should be treated differently. Methods Total of 494 patients treated between January 1996 and December 2012 with definitive radiotherapy were included for analysis. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between the groups were compared using long-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the role of histology after adjusting for potential confounders impacting on survival. Results The 5-year RFS of node-negative SCC and ADC was 79% and 75% and of node-positive SCC and ADC was 51% and 37%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 74% for both node-negative SCC and ADC and 54% and 42% for node-positive SCC and ADC, respectively. This difference in RFS and OS among these four subgroups was not significant. The tumour volume (p = 0.005), corpus invasion (p = 0.022) and lymph node involvement (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of RFS, whereas histology (p = 0.204) was not. Increasing age (p < 0.001), ECOG performance score 2 (p = 0.04), tumour volume (p = 0.009) and lymph node involvement (p < 0.001) were predictive for OS, but histology (p = 0.458) was not. There was no difference in pelvic and extra-pelvic failure of the two histological subtypes. Conclusion Both these histological types exhibit similar clinical behaviour and survival when matched for prognostic factors. Hence, current standard of care was equally effective in both histological types.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Should Adenocarcinoma of Cervix be Treated Differently to Squamous Cell Carcinoma?
    Ming Yin Lin
    Chrishanthi Rajasooriyar
    Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan
    Kailash Narayan
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2021, 19
  • [2] Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: Should They Be Treated Differently?
    Faustino, I.
    Catarino, R.
    Lombo, L.
    Figueiredo, T.
    Carvalho, L.
    Salgado, L.
    Sousa, S.
    Couto, R.
    Afonso, N.
    Pereira, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S531 - S532
  • [3] Adenocarcinoma and SCC of cervix: Should these be treated differently?
    Narayan, K.
    Lin, M. Y.
    Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 : 415 - 415
  • [4] Should adenosquamous esophageal carcinoma be treated like adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma?
    Gamboa, Adriana C.
    Meyer, Benjamin I.
    Switchenko, Jeffrey M.
    Rupji, Manali
    Lee, Rachel M.
    Turgeon, Michael K.
    Russell, Maria C.
    Cardona, Kenneth
    Kooby, David A.
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Shah, Mihir M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (04)
  • [5] Should Adenosquamous Esophageal Carcinoma be Treated Like Adenocarcinoma or Squamous Cell Carcinoma?
    Gamboa, A. C.
    Meyer, B. I.
    Switchenko, J. M.
    Rupji, M.
    Lee, R. M.
    Turgeon, M.
    Russell, M. C.
    Cardona, K.
    Kooby, D. A.
    Maithel, S. K.
    Shah, M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S202 - S203
  • [6] Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix: Should We Treat It Differently?
    Williams, Ned L.
    Werner, Theresa L.
    Jarboe, Elke A.
    Gaffney, David K.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (04)
  • [7] Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix: Should We Treat It Differently?
    Ned L. Williams
    Theresa L. Werner
    Elke A. Jarboe
    David K. Gaffney
    Current Oncology Reports, 2015, 17
  • [8] Should adenosquamous esophageal cancer be treated like adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma?
    Gamboa, Adriana C.
    Meyer, Benjamin I.
    Switchenko, Jeffrey M.
    Rupji, Manali
    Lee, Rachel M.
    Turgeon, Michael K.
    Russell, Maria C.
    Cardona, Kenneth
    Kooby, David A.
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Shah, Mihir M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 122 (03) : 412 - 421
  • [9] MORPHOMETRIC DIFFERENTIATION OF SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AND ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX
    Wesola, Marta
    Jelen, Michal
    POLISH JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2015, 66 (04) : 410 - 413
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF ADENOCARCINOMA AND SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX
    HOPKINS, MP
    MORLEY, GW
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 77 (06): : 912 - 917