Bootstrapping and normalization for enhanced evaluations of pairwise sequence comparison

被引:38
|
作者
Green, RE [1 ]
Brenner, SE
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Plant & Microbial Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mol & Cell Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BLAST; bootstrap; FASTA; homology; normalization; sequence; sequence analysis; Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP); substitution matrix;
D O I
10.1109/JPROC.2002.805303
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The exponentially growing library of known protein sequences represents molecules connected by an intricate network of evolutionary and functional relationships. To reveal these relationships, virtually every molecular biology experiment incorporates computational sequence analysis. The workhorse methods for this task make alignments between two sequences to measure their similarity. Informed use of these methods, such as NCBI BLAST [1], WU-BLAST [2], FASTA [3] and SSEARCH, requires understanding of their effectiveness. To permit informed sequence analysis, we have assessed the effectiveness of modern versions of these algorithms using the trusted relationships among ASTRAL [4] sequences in the Structural Classification of Proteins [5] database classification of protein structures [6]. We have reduced database representation artifacts through the use of a normalization method that addresses the uneven distribution of superfamily sizes. To allow for more meaningful and interpretable comparisons of results, we have implemented a bootstrapping procedure. We find that the most difficult pairwise relations to detect are those between members of larger superfamilies, and our test set is biased toward these. However, even when results are normalized, most distant evolutionary relationships elude detection.
引用
收藏
页码:1834 / 1847
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Introducing a Pairwise Comparison Scale for UX Evaluations with Preschoolers
    Zaman, Bieke
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT 2009, PT II, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5727 : 634 - 637
  • [2] Limits of homology detection by pairwise sequence comparison
    Spang, R
    Vingron, M
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2001, 17 (04) : 338 - 342
  • [3] Sequence-Specific Sequence Comparison Using Pairwise Statistical Significance
    Agrawal, Ankit
    Choudhary, Alok
    Huang, Xiaoqiu
    SOFTWARE TOOLS AND ALGORITHMS FOR BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, 2011, 696 : 297 - 306
  • [4] A novel Markov pairwise protein sequence alignment method for sequence comparison
    Zhao, XM
    Cheung, YM
    Huang, DS
    PROTEIN AND PEPTIDE LETTERS, 2005, 12 (07): : 665 - 669
  • [5] On normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons
    Koczkodaj, W. W.
    Magnot, J. -P.
    Mazurek, J.
    Peters, J. F.
    Rakhshani, H.
    Soltys, M.
    Strzalka, D.
    Szybowski, J.
    Tozzi, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2017, 86 : 73 - 79
  • [6] On normalization of inconsistency indicators in pairwise comparisons
    Koczkodaj, W.W. (wkoczkodaj@cs.laurentian.ca), 1600, Elsevier Inc. (86):
  • [7] Statistical evaluation of pairwise protein sequence comparison with the Bayesian bootstrap
    Price, GA
    Crooks, GE
    Green, RE
    Brenner, SE
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (20) : 3824 - 3831
  • [8] PAirwise Sequence Comparison (PASC) and Its Application in the Classification of Filoviruses
    Bao, Yiming
    Chetvernin, Vyacheslav
    Tatusova, Tatiana
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2012, 4 (08): : 1318 - 1327
  • [9] Pairwise sequence comparison data of the DNA barcodes of aquatic insects
    Inai, Koji
    Wakimura, Kei
    Kato, Mikio
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2020, 32
  • [10] Reliable evaluations of URL normalization
    Kim, SJ
    Jeong, HS
    Lee, SH
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2006, PT 5, 2006, 3984 : 609 - 617