Implications of Design Thinking for Teaching, Learning, and Inquiry

被引:13
|
作者
Orthel, Bryan D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
STUDIO; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1111/joid.12046
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The term design thinking has recently gained prominence within postsecondary design programs across the United States. The term is often used to explain and advocate for design's unique approach to solving problems in innovative ways. The term is also used as a general description for unexplained or ill-defined representations of what designers do. If design educators have a clear understanding of design thinking, they can improve teaching and learning, and reframe design-based and interdisciplinary inquiry. This article addresses design thinking through two layers. The first layer highlights key ways that designers think through an overview of more than 50years of design thinking's foundational literature. The second layer reports a 3-year-long, teaching-and-learning research project that compared learning in a design course and a similar nondesign course. The research project explores the application of design thinking's key ideas through the two courses. The project examined learning by 110 students enrolled in two courses during an annual, residential, summer enrichment program for high school seniors. The courses were structured in parallel ways for exploring design thinking and wicked problems, but addressed design and nondesign topics. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the courses and student learning demonstrate how the students used attributes of design thinking. The results challenge design educators to reconsider how design thinking may influence the classroom and inquiry.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning
    Dym, CL
    Agogino, AM
    Eris, O
    Frey, DD
    Leifer, LJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2005, 94 (01) : 103 - 120
  • [2] New perspectives on design learning, thinking and teaching
    Lloyd, Peter
    Bohemia, Erik
    [J]. ART DESIGN & COMMUNICATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 12 (02) : 145 - 147
  • [3] SCIENCE AS ARGUMENT - IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING SCIENTIFIC THINKING
    KUHN, D
    [J]. SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1993, 77 (03) : 319 - 337
  • [4] Thinking about teaching through inquiry
    Cousin, PT
    Dembrow, MP
    MolldremShamel, J
    [J]. READING TEACHER, 1997, 51 (02): : 162 - 164
  • [5] Teaching Computational Thinking to Multilingual Students through Inquiry-based Learning
    Jacob, Sharin
    Ha Nguyen
    Garcia, Leiny
    Richardson, Debra
    Warschauer, Mark
    [J]. 2020 IEEE STCBP RESEARCH ON EQUITY AND SUSTAINED PARTICIPATION IN ENGINEERING, COMPUTING, AND TECHNOLOGY (RESPECT), VOL 1, 2020, : 57 - 64
  • [6] Faculty experiences and motivations in design thinking teaching and learning
    McLaughlin, Jacqueline E.
    Lake, Danielle
    Chen, Elizabeth
    Guo, Wen
    Knock, McKenna
    Knotek, Steve
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
  • [7] A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF CARING THINKING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON TEACHING AND LEARNING
    Shaari, Anis
    Hamzah, Aswati
    [J]. MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LEARNING & INSTRUCTION, 2018, 15 (01): : 83 - 104
  • [8] Uncovering Pathways of Design Thinking and Learning: Inquiry on Intellectual Development and Learning Style Preferences
    Carmel-Gilfilen, Candy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERIOR DESIGN, 2012, 37 (03) : 47 - 66
  • [9] Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education
    Cakir, Mustafa
    [J]. SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2011, 20 (3-4) : 381 - 387
  • [10] The Intervention and Application of Inquiry Learning in the Design History Teaching of Art Design Specialty
    Zhou, Dapeng
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTEMPORARY EDUCATION, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES, 2016, 74 : 378 - 380