Risk-Constrained Optimal Operation Strategy for Virtual Power Plants Considering Incentive-Based Demand Response

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Chao [1 ]
Zhang, Zhenyuan [1 ]
Qiao, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Virtual Power Plant (VPP); Incentive-Based Demand Response (IBDR); multi-level incentive prices; stochastic program; Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR); ENERGY; MARKET;
D O I
10.1109/ICPSAsia55496.2022.9949901
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Incentive-based demand response (IBDR) and Energy Storage Systems (ESSs) can play an important role in addressing operation risks of the virtual power plant (VPP) participating in the short-term electricity market. In this paper, we propose a multi-level incentive electricity prices mechanism of IBDR and an interaction model of components in the VPP. Our objective is to maximize the profit of the VPP while analyzing the impact of decision makers' risk attitudes on their profits. A two-stage scenario-based risk-constrained stochastic program is formulated for the VPP participating in the market to deal with uncertainties of renewable energy resources (RESs). Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) is applied to generate scenarios and k-means clustering algorithm is employed to reduce the number of the scenarios for the sake of problem simplification. Moreover, applying conditional value at risk (CVaR) to measure economic risk attitudes of the VPP operators. The proposed method is implemented in a VPP and the numerical simulation results show its effectiveness and advantages.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1101
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk-Constrained Optimal Energy Management for Virtual Power Plants Considering Correlated Demand Response
    Liang, Zheming
    Alsafasfeh, Qais
    Jin, Tao
    Pourbabak, Hajir
    Su, Wencong
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (02) : 1577 - 1587
  • [2] Urban virtual power plant operation optimization with incentive-based demand response
    Zhou, Kaile
    Peng, Ning
    Yin, Hui
    Hu, Rong
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 282
  • [3] Optimal Price Incentive Strategy Based on Chance-constrained Programming for Virtual Power Plants Participating in Demand Response
    Meng, Hongmin
    Zhang, Zhizhi
    Xing, Xiaowen
    Liu, Di
    Liu, Zesan
    Xu, Zhenan
    Zhang, Wei
    [J]. 2021 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2021, : 6939 - 6944
  • [4] Risk-Constrained Offering Strategy of Wind Power Producers Considering Intraday Demand Response Exchange
    Heydarian-Forushani, Ehsan
    Moghaddam, Mohsen Parsa
    Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad Kazem
    Shafie-khah, Miadreza
    Catalao, Joao P. S.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014, 5 (04) : 1036 - 1047
  • [5] Optimal Configuration of Shared Energy Storage Considering the Incentive-Based Demand Response
    Ma, Lei
    Li, Xiaozhu
    Du, Xili
    Chen, Laijun
    [J]. 2022 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING, ICPEE, 2022, : 288 - 293
  • [6] Optimal sizing of an AC-coupled hybrid power system considering incentive-based demand response
    Combe, Matthew
    Mahmoudi, Amin
    Haque, Mohammed H.
    Khezri, Rahmat
    [J]. IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2019, 13 (15) : 3354 - 3361
  • [7] Risk-Constrained Optimal Bidding Strategy for Pairing of Wind and Demand Response Resources
    Asensio, Miguel
    Contreras, Javier
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2017, 8 (01) : 200 - 208
  • [8] Risk-Constrained Strategic Bidding of GenCos Considering Demand Response
    Kazemi, Mostafa
    Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam
    Ehsan, Mehdi
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2015, 30 (01) : 376 - 384
  • [9] Optimal Contract Design for Incentive-Based Demand Response
    Dobakhshari, Donya G.
    Gupta, Vijay
    [J]. 2016 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2016, : 3219 - 3224
  • [10] Risk-constrained stochastic optimal allocation of energy storage system in virtual power plants
    Sadeghian, Omid
    Oshnoei, Arman
    Khezri, Rahmat
    Muyeen, Sm
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 31