Increasing rates of operative vaginal delivery across two decades: accompanying outcomes and instrument preferences

被引:32
|
作者
Hehir, Mark P. [1 ]
Reidy, Fiona R. [1 ]
Wilkinson, Michael N. [1 ]
Mahony, Rhona [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Matern Hosp, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
Operative vaginal delivery; Rates; Forceps; Vacuum; Perinatal mortality; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.08.015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine rates and outcomes of operative vaginal delivery over a 20-year study period and the changing preference for various instruments during this period. Study design: This retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data was carried out at a large tertiary referral center from 1991 to 2010. All cases of operative vaginal delivery during the study period were recorded. The rates of instrumental delivery, as well as neonatal outcomes and instrument preference, were compared for individual 5-year epochs. Results: During the study period there were 156,130 deliveries of which 17,841 were operative vaginal deliveries, an incidence of 11.4/100 deliveries and 13.6/100 vaginal deliveries. There was an increase in the rate of operative vaginal delivery across the 20-year period (P < 0.0001; R-2 = 0.85; Slope = 0.42). When individual 5-year epochs were compared, the incidence of instrumental delivery increased from 7.3% (2340/31,937) in the first five years, 1991-1995, to 13.7% (6179/45,177) in the final five years, 2006-2010 (P < 0.0001; OR 2.34, 95% CI = 2.23-2.47). The perinatal mortality rate in cases of instrumental delivery was decreased when these time periods were compared (7.3/1000 (17/2340) vs. 1.8/1000 (11/6179); P = 0.003, OR 0.24,95% CI = 0.11-0.52). The choice of instrument also varied, with 68.2% (1596/2340) of instrumental deliveries in 1991-1995 being carried out with forceps compared to 32.9% (2033/6179) in 2006-2010 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Rates of operative vaginal delivery have increased over the 20-year study period. The rate of perinatal mortality in infants who had an assisted vaginal delivery was decreased in the 5-year epoch at the end of the study compared with the period at the beginning. The rate of forceps delivery has fallen significantly, with vacuum delivery now being the choice of the majority of clinicians. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 43
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Increasing Patient Understanding of Operative Vaginal Delivery
    Sharma, Mita
    Gimovsky, Alexis C.
    Wolf, Abigail
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 : 51S - 52S
  • [2] Neonatal and maternal outcomes in laboring nulliparas by cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates
    Andrikopoulou, Maria
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S190 - S190
  • [3] Differences in rates of operative vaginal delivery by age and race
    Qureshey, Emma J.
    Chen, Han-Yang
    Sibai, Baha M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S221 - S222
  • [4] RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF CHANGING RATES FOR OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY OVER THE DECADES IN A SINGLE TERTIARY HEALTH CARE CENTER
    Tanacan, Atakan
    Beksac, Mehmet Sinan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2019, 82 (03): : 139 - 143
  • [5] Neonatal Outcomes and Operative Vaginal Delivery Versus Cesarean Delivery
    Contag, Stephen A.
    Clifton, Rebecca G.
    Bloom, Steven L.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Peaceman, Alan M.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Sciscione, Anthony
    Carpenter, Marshall W.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Malone, Fergal D.
    Iams, Jay D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2010, 27 (06) : 493 - 499
  • [6] Association of obesity with outcomes of attempted operative vaginal delivery
    Grasch, Jennifer L.
    Venkatesh, Kartik Kailas
    Silver, Bob M.
    Saade, George R.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    Yee, Lynn M.
    Scifres, Christina
    Parry, Samuel
    Simhan, Hyagriv
    Chung, Judith H.
    McNeil, Rebecca B.
    Grobman, William A.
    Frey, Heather A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S490 - S490
  • [7] Operative vaginal delivery and third grade educational outcomes
    Ayala, Nina K.
    Schlichting, Lauren E.
    Kole, Martha B.
    Clark, Melissa A.
    Vivier, Patrick M.
    Viner-Brown, Samara, I
    Werner, Erika F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2020, 2 (04)
  • [8] Duration of Operative Vaginal Delivery and Adverse Obstetric Outcomes
    Miller, Emily S.
    Lai, Yinglei
    Bailit, Jennifer
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Prasad, Mona
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Saade, George R.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    Tolosa, Jorge E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2020, 37 (05) : 503 - 510
  • [9] Choice of Cesarean Delivery in Operative Vaginal Delivery Candidates Based on Physician Instrument Preference
    Metz, Torri D.
    Allshouse, Amanda A.
    Henry, Erick
    Esplin, Sean
    Andrews, Sasha
    Garite, Thomas J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 71S - 71S
  • [10] How safe is preterm operative vaginal delivery and which is the instrument of choice?
    Corcoran, Siobhan
    Daly, Niamh
    Eogan, Maeve
    Holohan, Mary
    Clarke, Tom
    Geary, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (01) : 57 - 60