Development of Green Building Rating System Using AHP and Fuzzy Integrals: A Case of India

被引:25
|
作者
Vyas, Gayatri S. [1 ]
Jha, Kumar N. [2 ]
Patel, Dilip A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Pune 411005, Maharashtra, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Civil Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
[3] SV Natl Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Surat 395007, Gujarat, India
关键词
Green building; Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); Fuzzy integral; India; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000346
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The greenness of a building is measured through green building assessment tools. These tools have limitations because they cannot be applied to all regions. The aim of this research was to develop a green building assessment tool that can rate the greenness of new buildings in India. For this, a study was conducted by adopting nine green building components with 34 attributes relevant to the measurement of greenness. For evaluating the green building index (GBI), a three-level hierarchical structure was constructed in which the GBI is at Level 1, and the nine components and 34 attributes are at Levels 2 and 3, respectively. In this study, an integrated approach consisting of an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy integrals was used. The 42 responses obtained from green building experts were used to find the weights of the components using the AHP. The relative importance of different attributes was computed using fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals. Finally, the weighted-sum method (WSM) was employed to get the overall GBI. The results of the proposed approach are compared with Indian case studies. The findings of this article can be helpful to green building planners, designers, and developers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating Weight Priority on Green Building Using Fuzzy AHP
    Galvani, Robastian Yudha
    Effendy, Nazrul
    Kusumawanto, Arif
    [J]. 2018 12TH SOUTH EAST ASIAN TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM (SYMPOSIUM SEATUC 2018): ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018,
  • [2] Using AHP method for development of existing building green assessment system in Jordan
    Alkubaisi A.
    Alnsour M.A.
    [J]. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2022, 23 (8) : 1231 - 1250
  • [3] Technical attributes of LEED rating system: Green building innovation in India
    Verma, Saurabh
    Mandal, Satya N.
    Bajaj, Deepak
    [J]. Test Engineering and Management, 2019, 81 (11-12): : 2201 - 2205
  • [4] Comprehensive Assessment of Green Degree of Building Material Using Fuzzy AHP
    Yi, Cheng
    Shi, Jing
    Zhao, Xiaolong
    Zhao, Wenhai
    Liu, Qiang
    Liu, Huixin
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF GREEN BUILDING, MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-8, 2011, 71-78 : 769 - +
  • [5] Current Situation and Development of Green Building Rating System in Myanmar
    Lwin, May
    Panuwatwanich, Kriengsak
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, PROJECT, AND PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT (EPPM2018), 2020, 312
  • [6] Study on Green Building Rating System
    Guo, Li-hua
    Meng, Kai
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ICESD 2014), 2014, : 77 - 79
  • [7] Development of an integrative green building rating system for the Ethiopian public building projects using analytic hierarchy process
    Gashaw, Rediet
    Belay, Solomon
    Gizat, Anmut
    Hailu, Solomon
    Rokooei, Saeed
    Matos, Jose
    [J]. COGENT ENGINEERING, 2023, 10 (02):
  • [8] GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM SCORES FOR BUILDING REUSE
    Aye, Lu
    Hes, Dominique
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2012, 7 (02): : 105 - 112
  • [9] Automated Green Building Rating System for Building Designs
    Nguyen, T. H.
    Toroghi, Sh. H.
    Jacobs, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 22 (04)
  • [10] Saving Energy through Using Green Rating System for Building Commissioning
    Mohamed, Mady A. A.
    [J]. EMERGING AND RENEWABLE ENERGY: GENERATION AND AUTOMATION, 2019, 162 : 369 - 378