Calibration of a Field-Scale Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model with Field Placement of Best Management Practices in Alger Creek, Michigan

被引:28
|
作者
Merriman, Katherine R. [1 ]
Russell, Amy M. [1 ]
Rachol, Cynthia M. [2 ]
Daggupati, Prasad [3 ]
Srinivasan, Raghavan [4 ]
Hayhurst, Brett A. [5 ]
Stuntebeck, Todd D. [6 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Cent Midwest Water Sci Ctr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Upper Midwest Water Sci Ctr, Lansing, MI 48911 USA
[3] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Spatial Sci Lab, Ecosyst Sci & Management Dept, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[5] US Geol Survey, New York Water Sci Ctr, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[6] US Geol Survey, Upper Midwest Water Sci Ctr, Middleton, WI 53562 USA
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2018年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
best management practices (BMPs); Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT); nutrients; field-scale; Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI); edge-of-field (EOF); GREAT-LAKES; QUALITY MODELS; SAGINAW BAY; LEVEL; HRUS; VALIDATION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.3390/su10030851
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Subwatersheds within the Great Lakes "Priority Watersheds" were targeted by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) to determine the effectiveness of the various best management practices (BMPs) from the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service National Conservation Planning (NCP) Database. A Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model is created for Alger Creek, a 50 km(2) tributary watershed to the Saginaw River in Michigan. Monthly calibration yielded very good Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) ratings for flow, sediment, total phosphorus (TP), dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), and total nitrogen (TN) (0.90, 0.79, 0.87, 0.88, and 0.77, respectively), and satisfactory NSE rating for nitrate (0.51). Two-year validation results in at least satisfactory NSE ratings for flow, sediment, TP, DRP, and TN (0.83, 0.54, 0.73, 0.53, and 0.60, respectively), and unsatisfactory NSE rating for nitrate (0.28). The model estimates the effect of BMPs at the field and watershed scales. At the field-scale, the most effective single practice at reducing sediment, TP, and DRP is no-tillage followed by cover crops (CC); CC are the most effective single practice at reducing nitrate. The most effective BMP combinations include filter strips, which can have a sizable effect on reducing sediment and phosphorus loads. At the watershed scale, model results indicate current NCP BMPs result in minimal sediment and nutrient reductions (<10%).
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Field-scale calibration of crop-yield parameters in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)
    Sinnathamby, Sumathy
    Douglas-Mankin, Kyle R.
    Craige, Collin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2017, 180 : 61 - 69
  • [2] Assessment of site-specific agricultural Best Management Practices in the Upper East River watershed, Wisconsin, using a field-scale SWAT model
    Merriman, Katherine R.
    Daggupati, Prasad
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    Hayhurst, Brett
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2019, 45 (03) : 619 - 641
  • [3] APPLICATION OF THE SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL (SWAT) AT FIELD SCALE: CATEGORIZING METHODS AND REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS
    Karki, R.
    Srivastava, P.
    Veith, T. L.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2020, 63 (02) : 513 - 522
  • [4] Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to predict the impact of best management practices in Jatigede Catchment Area
    Ridwansyah, Iwan
    Fakhrudin, M.
    Wibowo, Hendro
    Yulianti, Meti
    [J]. GLOBAL COLLOQUIUM ON GEOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING 2017, 2018, 118
  • [5] A Field-Scale Decision Support System for Assessment and Management of Soil Functions
    Debeljak, Marko
    Trajanov, Aneta
    Kuzmanovski, Vladimir
    Schroder, Jaap
    Sanden, Taru
    Spiegel, Heide
    Wall, David O.
    Van de Broeks, Manjn
    Rutgers, Michiel
    Bampa, Francesca
    Creamer, Rachel E.
    Henriksen, Christian B.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 7
  • [6] Paying for sediment: Field-scale conservation practice targeting, funding, and assessment using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool
    Douglas-Mankin, K. R.
    Daggupati, P.
    Sheshukov, A. Y.
    Barnes, P. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2013, 68 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [7] Comparison of Calibration Approaches of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model in a Tropical Watershed
    Makumbura, Randika K.
    Gunathilake, Miyuru B.
    Samarasinghe, Jayanga T.
    Confesor, Remegio
    Muttil, Nitin
    Rathnayake, Upaka
    [J]. HYDROLOGY, 2022, 9 (10)
  • [8] RESIDUE MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON FIELD-SCALE SNOW DISTRIBUTION AND SOIL WATER STORAGE
    Qiu, H.
    Huggins, D. R.
    Wu, J. Q.
    Barber, M. E.
    McCool, D. K.
    Dun, S.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2011, 54 (05) : 1639 - 1647
  • [9] Sediment Yield at Catchment Scale Using the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) Model
    Luz Rodriguez-Blanco, M.
    Arias, Ricardo
    Mercedes Taboada-Castro, M.
    Nunes, Jao Pedro
    Keizer, Jan Jacob
    Teresa Taboada-Castro, M.
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE, 2016, 181 (07) : 326 - 334
  • [10] Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to assess environmental concentrations of an agricultural pesticide and the potential benefits of best management practices.
    Winchell, MF
    Estes, TL
    Alexander, SS
    Srinivasan, R
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 228 : U104 - U104