Towards a comprehensive life cycle energy analysis framework for residential buildings

被引:106
|
作者
Stephan, Andre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Crawford, Robert H. [3 ]
de Myttenaere, Kristel [2 ]
机构
[1] Belgian Natl Fund Sci Res, Aspirant FRS FNRS, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Life cycle energy analysis; Residential buildings; Embodied energy; Transport energy; Operational energy; Software tool; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.09.008
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Current assessments of residential building energy demand focus mainly on operational energy, notably in thermal terms. The embodied energy of buildings and the transport energy consumption of their users are typically overlooked. Recent studies have shown that these two energy demands can represent more than half of the life cycle energy over 50 years. This article presents a framework which takes into account energy requirements at the building scale, i.e. the embodied and operational energy of the building and its refurbishment, and at the city scale, i.e. the embodied energy of nearby infrastructures and the transport energy (direct and indirect) of its users. This framework has been implemented through the development of a software tool which allows the rapid analysis of the life cycle energy demand of buildings at different scales. Results from two case studies, located in Brussels, Belgium and Melbourne. Australia, confirm that each of the embodied, operational and transport requirements are nearly equally important. By integrating these three energy flows, the developed framework and software provide building designers, planners and decision makers with a powerful tool to effectively reduce the overall energy consumption and associated greenhouse gas emissions of residential buildings. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 600
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comprehensive life cycle water analysis framework for residential buildings
    Stephan, Andre
    Crawford, Robert H.
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2014, 42 (06): : 685 - 695
  • [2] Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings
    Gustavsson, Leif
    Joelsson, Anna
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (02) : 210 - 220
  • [3] Life cycle energy and carbon analysis of commercial and residential buildings in India
    Rajasekharan, K. Ayeratharasu
    Porchelvan, P.
    [J]. GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2023, 25 (01): : 134 - 140
  • [4] Life-cycle energy of residential buildings in China
    Chang, Yuan
    Ries, Robert J.
    Wang, Yaowu
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 656 - 664
  • [5] Life cycle energy analysis of residential wooden buildings versus concrete and steel buildings: A review
    Schenk, Daniela
    Amiri, Ali
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8
  • [6] A comprehensive analysis towards benchmarking of life cycle assessment of buildings based on systematic review
    Dong, Yahong
    Ng, S. Thomas
    Liu, Peng
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 204
  • [7] Impact of life cycle assessment analysis on energy efficiency projects in Mediterranean residential buildings
    Almeida, Manuela
    Ascione, Fabrizio
    Iovane, Teresa
    Mastellone, Margherita
    Mateus, Ricardo
    [J]. ENERGY, 2024, 295
  • [8] Sustainable construction: life cycle energy analysis of construction on sloping sites for residential buildings
    Ding, Grace
    Forsythe, Perry John
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (03) : 254 - 265
  • [9] Analysis of the embodied energy of construction materials in the life cycle assessment of Hellenic residential buildings
    Dascalaki, Elena G.
    Argiropoulou, Poulia
    Balaras, Constantinos A.
    Droutsa, Kalliopi G.
    Kontoyiannidis, Simon
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 232
  • [10] Life cycle embodied energy analysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to investigate embodied energy parameters
    Dixit, Manish K.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 79 : 390 - 413