Diagnostic Accuracy of Neonatal Assessment for Gestational Age Determination: A Systematic Review

被引:67
|
作者
Lee, Anne C. C. [1 ,3 ]
Panchal, Pratik [4 ,5 ]
Folger, Lian [1 ]
Whelan, Hilary [6 ]
Whelan, Rachel [7 ]
Rosner, Bernard [2 ,3 ]
Blencowe, Hannah [8 ,9 ]
Lawn, Joy E. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pediat Newborn Med, BB502A,75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Channing Div Network Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth & Populat, Boston, MA USA
[5] OpenBiome, Dept Clin Res, Somerville, MA USA
[6] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[7] Community Partners Int, Dept Res, Yangon, Myanmar
[8] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Epidemiol Populat Hlth, London, England
[9] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Ctr Maternal Adolescent Reprod & Child Hlth MARCH, London, England
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
ANTERIOR VASCULAR CAPSULE; LAST MENSTRUAL PERIOD; CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT; NEWBORN-INFANT; POSTNATAL ASSESSMENT; BALLARD EXAMINATION; WEIGHING LESS; TIME TRENDS; PRETERM; SCORE;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2017-1423
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: An estimated 15 million neonates are born preterm annually. However, in low- and middle-income countries, the dating of pregnancy is frequently unreliable or unknown. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of neonatal assessments to estimate gestational age (GA). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, POPLINE, and World Health Organization library databases. STUDY SELECTION: Studies of live-born infants in which researchers compared neonatal signs or assessments for GA estimation with a reference standard. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data on study population, design, bias, reference standard, test methods, accuracy, agreement, validity, correlation, and interrater reliability. RESULTS: Four thousand nine hundred and fifty-six studies were screened and 78 included. We identified 18 newborn assessments for GA estimation (ranging 4 to 23 signs). Compared with ultrasound, the Dubowitz score dated 95% of pregnancies within 2.6 weeks (n = 7 studies), while the Ballard score overestimated GA (0.4 weeks) and dated pregnancies within 3.8 weeks (n = 9). Compared with last menstrual period, the Dubowitz score dated 95% of pregnancies within +/- 2.9 weeks (n = 6 studies) and the Ballard score, +/- 4.2 weeks (n = 5). Assessments with fewer signs tended to be less accurate. A few studies showed a tendency for newborn assessments to overestimate GA in preterm infants and underestimate GA in growth-restricted infants. LIMITATIONS: Poor study quality and few studies with early ultrasound-based reference. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts in low- and middle-income countries should focus on improving dating in pregnancy through ultrasound and improving validity in growth-restricted populations. Where ultrasound is not possible, increased efforts are needed to develop simpler yet specific approaches for newborn assessment through new combinations of existing parameters, new signs, or technology.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Observed ranges of neonatal blood pressure by gestational age: a systematic review
    Dore, Rhys
    Barnes, Katy
    Bremner, Stephen
    Dionne, Janis
    Rabe, Heike
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2021, 90 (SUPPL 1) : 14 - 14
  • [2] Neonatal blood pressure by birth weight, gestational age, and postnatal age: a systematic review
    Rhys Dore
    Katy Barnes
    Stephen Bremner
    Hiroko Ishii Iwami
    Dina Apele-Freimane
    Beau Batton
    Eugene Dempsey
    Ebru Ergenekon
    Agnes Klein
    Luana Pesco-Koplowitz
    Janis M. Dionne
    Heike Rabe
    Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, 10 (1)
  • [3] Proadrenomedullin and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy
    Milas, Gerasimos Panagiotis
    Issaris, Vasileios
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 181 (01) : 59 - 71
  • [4] Proadrenomedullin and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy
    Gerasimos Panagiotis Milas
    Vasileios Issaris
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2022, 181 : 59 - 71
  • [5] Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tools for assessment of acute stroke: a systematic review
    Daria Antipova
    Leila Eadie
    Ashish Macaden
    Philip Wilson
    BMC Emergency Medicine, 19
  • [6] Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tools for assessment of acute stroke: a systematic review
    Antipova, Daria
    Eadie, Leila
    Macaden, Ashish
    Wilson, Philip
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [7] Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for Assessment of Hamstring Injury: A Systematic Review
    Reiman, Michael P.
    Loudon, Janice K.
    Goode, Adam P.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 43 (04): : 222 - 231
  • [8] Accuracy of screening tests for gestational diabetes mellitus in Southeast Asia A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Lappharat, Sattamat
    Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (46) : E23161
  • [9] Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review
    Batista Leite, Debora Farias
    Morillon, Aude-Claire
    Melo Junior, Elias F.
    Souza, Renato T.
    McCarthy, Fergus P.
    Khashan, Ali
    Baker, Philip
    Kenny, Louise C.
    Cecatti, Jose Guilherme
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of glycated hemoglobin for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Renz, Paula B.
    Chume, Fernando C.
    Timm, Joao R. T.
    Pimentel, Ana L.
    Camargo, Joiza L.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2019, 57 (10) : 1435 - 1449