Introductory postcards: do they increase response rate in a telephone survey of older persons?

被引:20
|
作者
Iredell, H [1 ]
Shaw, T [1 ]
Howat, P [1 ]
James, R [1 ]
Granich, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, WA Ctr Hlth Promot Res, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1093/her/cyg015
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess whether contact by mail via an introductory postcard would increase the response rate to a telephone survey in a selected population of 348 people 60 years and older. Of this group, 208 were sent a postcard introducing the study and informing them that someone would call in the next 1-2 weeks to conduct a telephone interview. The remaining sample of 140 did not receive the introductory postcard. Amongst the potential participants who were contacted and able to participate (n = 240), the response rate for completed interview was 58.0% for those sent a postcard and 42.3% for those who were not. The refusal rate was 25.3% (postcard sent) and 37.2% (not sent a postcard). When the outcome of contact is collapsed to two categories, 'agreed to participate' and 'refusal', the response rate to participate was 73.5% (sent a postcard) and 59.0% (not sent a postcard) (chi(2) 5.14, d.f. 1, sign. 0.023). The response rate amongst those who recall being sent a postcard rose to 86.0%. Whether agreeing to participate or refusing to be involved in the survey was dependent on being sent an introductory postcard. The conclusion is that mailing a postcard prior to the first telephone contact increases the participation rates of older persons in a telephone survey at very little extra cost (A$0.60 per person).
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 164
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] The Effects of Outgoing Envelopes, rewards, and follow-up postcards on the Response Rate in Mail Surveys: Do Transparent Envelopes Increase Response?
    Maeda, Hiromitsu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 852 - 852
  • [2] Effects of an introductory letter on response rates to a teen/parent telephone health survey
    Woodruff, Susan I.
    Mayer, Joni A.
    Clapp, Elizabeth
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 2006, 30 (06) : 817 - 823
  • [3] Do Additional Recontacts to Increase Response Rate Improve Physician Survey Data Quality?
    Willis, Gordon B.
    Smith, Tenbroeck
    Lee, Hyunshik J.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2013, 51 (10) : 945 - 948
  • [4] RESPONSE RATES IN A SURVEY OF PHYSICAL CAPACITY AMONG OLDER PERSONS
    KOVAL, JJ
    ECCLESTONE, NA
    PATERSON, DH
    BROWN, B
    CUNNINGHAM, DA
    RECHNITZER, PA
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1992, 47 (03): : S140 - S147
  • [5] An advance letter did not increase the response rates in a telephone survey: a randomized trial
    Carey, Renee N.
    Reid, Alison
    Driscoll, Timothy R.
    Glass, Deborah C.
    Benke, Geza
    Fritschi, Lin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (12) : 1417 - 1421
  • [6] International survey research Understanding national cultures to increase survey response rate
    Rao, Pramila
    [J]. CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (02): : 165 - 178
  • [7] A survey of surveys: The attitude of anaesthetists to participation in survey questionnaires and factors to increase the response rate
    Smithson, E.
    Reddy, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 229 - 229
  • [8] Including the questionnaire with an invitation letter did not improve a telephone survey's response rate
    Byrne, Christopher M.
    Harrison, James D.
    Young, Jane M.
    Selby, Warwick S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (12) : 1312 - 1314
  • [9] Using "Communication Ramps'' to Enable Participation in a Survey and Increase Response Rate
    Scott, Julie
    Sinclair, Olivia
    Haughey, Marie
    Boyle, Orla
    O'Connor, Martina
    Caffrey, Andrea
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 183 : S309 - S310
  • [10] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 2 INCENTIVES TO INCREASE RESPONSE RATE TO A MAILED SURVEY
    PERNEGER, TV
    ETTER, JF
    ROUGEMONT, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 138 (08) : 619 - 619