The Role of Stated Preference Valuation Methods in Understanding Choices and Informing Policy

被引:70
|
作者
Hanley, Nick [1 ]
Czajkowski, Mikolaj [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Inst Biodivers Anim Hlth & Comparat Med, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Warsaw, Fac Econ Sci, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; DESIGN; INFORMATION; BENEFITS; EMOTIONS; CONSEQUENTIALITY; IMPROVEMENTS;
D O I
10.1093/reep/rez005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the role of stated preference (SP) valuation methods in the environmental economist's toolbox. Overall, the article makes the case for using SP methods in a wide range of settings, showing how the approach can be used to both inform policy and gain a better understanding of people's choices and preferences. First, we provide an overview of SP methods and discuss a number of policy design issues where we believe SP methods have advantages over alternative approaches. The ability of SP to overcome "hypothetical market bias" is briefly reviewed. Next, we discuss how SP methods can be used to address research issues concerning people's preferences and choices, which have broader implications for economics and behavioral sciences. These research issues are (1) the effects of information, learning and knowledge; (2) testing the validity of the standard model of consumer choice; (3) the influence of behavioral drivers such as social norms; and (4) the role of "deep" determinants of preference heterogeneity such as emotions and personality. Finally, we identify some research areas where SP methods may be particularly useful in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 266
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation
    Boxall, PC
    Adamowicz, WL
    Swait, J
    Williams, M
    Louviere, J
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (03) : 243 - 253
  • [2] A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation
    Boxall, PC
    Adamowicz, WL
    Swait, J
    Williams, M
    Louviere, J
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIE RURALE, 1995, 43 (04): : 651 - 651
  • [3] What to Value and How? Ecological Indicator Choices in Stated Preference Valuation
    Zhao, Minjuan
    Johnston, Robert J.
    Schultz, Eric T.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 56 (01): : 3 - 25
  • [4] What to Value and How? Ecological Indicator Choices in Stated Preference Valuation
    Minjuan Zhao
    Robert J. Johnston
    Eric T. Schultz
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2013, 56 : 3 - 25
  • [5] A comparison of stated preference methods for the valuation of improvement in road safety
    Niroomand, Naghmeh
    Jenkins, Glenn P.
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2018, 59 : 138 - 149
  • [6] Spatial dimensions in stated preference valuation: The role of place attachment
    Iversen, Endre Kildal
    Dugstad, Anders
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2024, 136
  • [7] Combining Stated Preference and Revealed Preference Methods for the Valuation of Non-market Goods
    Zhang Haipeng
    Xie Xuxuan
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2012, (04) : 121 - 126
  • [8] Combining Stated Preference and Revealed Preference Methods for the Valuation of Non-market Goods
    Zhang Haipeng
    Xie Xuxuan
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (04) : 121 - 126
  • [9] Redesigning Environmental Valuation: Mixing Methods Within Stated Preference Techniques
    Johnston, Robert J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (05) : 1564 - 1565
  • [10] New directions in mortality risk valuation and stated preference methods: Preliminary results
    Krupnick, A
    Alberini, A
    Belli, R
    Cropper, M
    Simon, N
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (PSAM 4), VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 2365 - 2370