Development and feasibility of a set of quality indicators relative to the timeliness and organisation of care for new breast cancer patients undergoing surgery

被引:10
|
作者
Ferrua, Marie [1 ]
Couralet, Melanie [1 ]
Nitenberg, Gerard [1 ]
Morin, Sandrine [2 ]
Serin, Daniel [3 ]
Minvielle, Etienne [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Cancerol Gustave Roussy, INSERM COMPAQ HPST Project, F-94805 Villejuif, France
[2] Haute Autorite Sante, F-93218 La Plaine St Denis, France
[3] Inst St Catherine, F-84000 Avignon, France
来源
关键词
Breast cancer; Quality indicators; Quality of health care; Timeliness of care; HEALTH-CARE; OF-CARE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-12-167
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Because breast cancer is a major public health issue, it is particularly important to measure the quality of the care provided to patients. Survival rates are affected by the timeliness of care, and waiting times constitute key quality criteria. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a set of quality indicators (QIs) relative to the timeliness and organisation of care in new patients with infiltrating, non-inflammatory and metastasis-free breast cancer undergoing surgery. The ultimate aim was to use these QIs to compare hospitals. Methods: The method of QI construction and testing was developed by COMPAQ-HPST. We first derived a set of 8 QIs from consensus guidelines with the aid of experts and professional associations and then tested their metrological properties in a panel of 60 volunteer hospitals. We assessed feasibility using a grid exploring 5 dimensions, discriminatory power using the Gini coefficient as a measure of dispersion, and inter-observer reliability using the Kappa coefficient. Results: Overall, 3728 records were included in the analyses. All 8 QIs showed acceptable feasibility (but one QI was subject to misinterpretation), fairly strong agreement between observers (Kappa = 0.66), and wide variations in implementation among hospitals (Gini coefficient < 0.45 except for QI 6 (patient information)). They are thus suitable for use to compare hospitals and measure quality improvement. Conclusions: Of the 8 QIs, 3 are ready for nationwide implementation (time to surgery, time to postoperative multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM), conformity of MDTM). Four are suitable for use only in hospitals offering surgery with on-site postoperative treatment (waiting time to first appointment after surgery, patient information, time to first postoperative treatment, and traceability of information relating to prognosis). Currently, in the French healthcare system, a patient receives cancer care from different institutions whose databases cannot as yet be easily merged. Nationwide implementation of QIs covering the entire care pathway will thus be a challenge.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and feasibility of a set of quality indicators relative to the timeliness and organisation of care for new breast cancer patients undergoing surgery
    Marie Ferrua
    Mélanie Couralet
    Gérard Nitenberg
    Sandrine Morin
    Daniel Serin
    Etienne Minvielle
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 12
  • [2] Development of quality indicators for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery
    McGory, Marcia L.
    Shekelle, Paul G.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (22) : 1623 - 1633
  • [3] Developing a set of quality indicators for breast cancer care in China
    Bao, Han
    Yang, Fengjuan
    Wang, Xinyu
    Su, Shaofei
    Liu, Dan
    Fu, Rong
    Zhang, Huimin
    Liu, Meina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 27 (04) : 291 - 296
  • [4] Developing quality indicators for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery
    McGory, ML
    Shekelle, PG
    Ko, CY
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (05) : 780 - 781
  • [5] Quality indicators for surgery of rectal cancer. Evidence-based development of a set of indicators for quality
    Wiegering, A.
    Buhr, H. -J.
    Klinger, C.
    Fuerst, A.
    Schiedeck, T.
    Schwandner, O.
    Stelzner, S.
    Germer, C. -T.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2018, 89 (01): : 26 - 31
  • [6] Quality indicators for colon cancer surgery. Evidence-based development of a set of indicators for the outcome quality
    Hardt, J.
    Buhr, H. -J.
    Klinger, C.
    Benz, S.
    Ludwig, K.
    Kalff, J.
    Post, S.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2018, 89 (01): : 17 - 25
  • [7] Quality of Colon Cancer Care in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery
    Guidolin, Keegan
    Withers, Rebecca
    Shariff, Farhana
    Ashamalla, Shady
    Nadler, Ashlie
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 2079 - 2086
  • [8] Development of a supportive care needs eHealth application for patients with cervical cancer undergoing surgery: a feasibility study
    Song, Yongxia
    Xia, Lili
    Ju, Xiaodi
    Wang, Wenjing
    Ge, Xiaoling
    Hong, Jingfang
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [9] Development of a supportive care needs eHealth application for patients with cervical cancer undergoing surgery: a feasibility study
    Yongxia Song
    Lili Xia
    Xiaodi Ju
    Wenjing Wang
    Xiaoling Ge
    Jingfang Hong
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [10] Quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery in Greece
    Zafrakas, M.
    Eskitzis, P.
    Demetriades, I.
    Sympilidis, G.
    Panagopoulou, E.
    Papanikolaou, A.
    Tarlatzis, B. C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S93 - S93