The nursing critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire for nursing students: A psychometric evaluation study

被引:2
|
作者
Zuriguel-Perez, Esperanza [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Lluch-Canut, Maria-Teresa [3 ]
Puig-Llobet, Montserrat [3 ]
Basco-Prado, Luis [4 ]
Almazor-Sirvent, Adria [5 ]
Biurrun-Garrido, Ainoa [6 ]
Aguayo-Gonzalez, Mariela Patricia [7 ]
Mestres-Soler, Olga [2 ,8 ]
Roldan-Merino, Juan [5 ]
机构
[1] Vall Hebron Univ Hosp, Dept Knowledge Management & Evaluat, Passeig Vall Hebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[2] Vall Hebron Res Inst VHIR, Multidisciplinary Nursing Res Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Dept Psychosocial & Mental Hlth Nursing, Carrer Feixa Llarga S-N, Barcelona 08907, Spain
[4] Univ Barcelona, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Dept Fundamental & Med Surg Nursing, Carrer Feixa Llarga S-N, Barcelona 08907, Spain
[5] Univ Barcelona, Sch Nursing, Dept Mental Hlth Nursing, Campus Docent St Joan Deu, Carrer Miret i Sans 10-16, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[6] Univ Barcelona, Sch Nursing, Campus Docent St Joan Deu, Res Grp Nursing Educ, Carrer Miret i Sans 10-16, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[7] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Fac Med, Res Grp Vulnerability & Hlth GRIVIS, Dept Nursing, Barcelona 08193, Spain
[8] Vall Hebron Univ Hosp, Hosp Nurse Vall Hebron Gen Hosp, Passeig Vall Hebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[9] Vall dHebron Res Inst VHIR Vall dHebron Univ Hos, Head Multidisciplinary Nursing Res Grp, Passeig Vall dHebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
关键词
Critical thinking; Instrument; Nursing education; Nursing student; Psychometrics; ABILITY; PERCEPTIONS; GUIDELINES; EDUCATION; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103498
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: To adapt and validate the N-CT-4 Practice for use with Spanish nursing students. Background: Promoting critical thinking is one of the primary objectives of nursing education programs all over the world. Using reliable and valid instruments to measure critical thinking is essential. The Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire (N-CT-4 Practice) is used internationally to assess critical thinking in nursing practice. However, little is known about the possible applications of this instrument in the context of nursing education. Methods: Two-phase study: Phase I, adaptation of the N-CT-4 Practice for use with nursing students and verification of its content validity; phase 2, cross-sectional study to validate its psychometric properties in a sample of 331 nursing students from three university nursing schools. A subsample of 34 students completed the questionnaire on two occasions, with a time interval of two weeks. The construct validity and reliability of the instrument were tested using confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability. The STROBE guidelines and the COSMIN checklist were followed. Results: All items obtained optimal content validity values. The model fit indices obtained from the confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesis of the four-dimensional structure on which the original questionnaire was based. Cronbach's alpha of 0.96 indicated high reliability. The correlations between the total score and the scores for the dimensions were statistically significant, positive and high, with values above r = 0.78 (p < 0.05). Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.6 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The adapted version of the N-CT-4 Practice is suitable for measuring critical thinking skills in the educational context of the degree course in nursing in Spain. Its psychometric validation yielded satisfactory results.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Vietnamese version of the nursing critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire: Translation and psychometric evaluation
    Nguyen, Tuan Van
    Liu, Hsueh-Erh
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (04): : 1840 - 1847
  • [2] Development and Psychometric Properties of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire
    Zuriguel-Perez, Esperanza
    Falco-Pegueroles, Anna
    Roldan-Merino, Juan
    Agustino-Rodriguez, Sandra
    del Carmen Gomez-Martin, Maria
    Teresa Lluch-Canut, Maria
    [J]. WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2017, 14 (04) : 257 - 264
  • [3] Development and psychometric evaluation of a reflection on clinical practice questionnaire for nursing students
    Mostafa Bijani
    Fateme Mohammadi
    Fariba Haghani
    Nikoo Yamani
    Shahnaz Karimi
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 20
  • [4] Development and psychometric evaluation of a reflection on clinical practice questionnaire for nursing students
    Bijani, Mostafa
    Mohammadi, Fateme
    Haghani, Fariba
    Yamani, Nikoo
    Karimi, Shahnaz
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [5] Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Students' Attitudes towards Nursing Education Research Questionnaire
    Burrell, Sherry
    Ross, Jennifer
    Mariani, Bette
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2019, 68 (02) : E59 - E60
  • [6] Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Nursing Education Research Questionnaire
    Burrell, Sherry A.
    Ross, Jennifer Gunberg
    Heverly, MaryAnn
    Mariani, Bette
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2020, 28 (02) : 303 - 321
  • [7] Critical thinking of beginning baccalaureate nursing students during the first clinical nursing course
    Sedlak, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 1997, 36 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [8] Nursing Students' Critical Thinking Levels
    Akca, Selen Ozkarar
    Selen, Filiz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY (ICH&HPSY), 2015, 5 : 74 - 83
  • [9] Clinical supervision strategies, learning, and critical thinking of nursing students
    da Silva, Angelica Oliveira Verissimo
    de Carvalho, Antonio Luis Rodrigues Faria
    Vieira, Rui Marques
    Pinto, Cristina Maria Correia Barroso
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2023, 76 (04)
  • [10] A longitudinal evaluation of baccalaureate nursing students' critical thinking abilities
    Adams, MH
    Stover, LM
    Whitlow, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 1999, 38 (03) : 139 - 141