Comparison of dynamic control strategies for transit operations

被引:56
|
作者
Carlos Munoz, Juan [1 ]
Cortes, Cristian E. [2 ]
Giesen, Ricardo [1 ]
Saez, Doris [3 ]
Delgado, Felipe [1 ]
Valencia, Francisco [2 ]
Cipriano, Aldo [4 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Transport Engn & Logist, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Chile, Dept Civil Engn, Santiago, Chile
[3] Univ Chile, Dept Elect Engn, Santiago, Chile
[4] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Elect Engn, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Transit systems; Transit control; Performance comparison; Vehicle bunching; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.trc.2012.12.010
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Real-time headway-based control is a key issue to reduce bus bunching in high frequency urban bus services where schedules are difficult to implement. Several mechanisms have been proposed in the literature, but very few performance comparisons are available. In this paper two different approaches are tested over eight different scenarios. Both methodologies solve the same problem, the former based on a deterministic optimization over a long-term rolling horizon, while the latter proposes a hybrid predictive approach considering a shorter horizon and a stochastic evolution of the system. The comparison is conducted through scenarios that include three different dimensions: (i) bus capacities which can be reached or not, (ii) service frequencies, considering high and medium frequency services and (iii) different load profiles along the corridor. The results show that the deterministic approach performs better under scenarios where bus capacity could be reached frequently along the route while the hybrid predictive control approach performs better in situations where this does not happen. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 113
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and comparison of dynamic transit signal priority strategies
    Ekeila, Wael
    Sayed, Tarek
    El Esawey, Mohamed
    [J]. EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION AND PAVEMENT SYSTEMS: CHARACTERIZATION, MECHANISMS, SIMULATION, AND MODELING, 2009, : 33 - 46
  • [2] Modeling real-time control strategies in public transit operations
    Eberlein, XJ
    Wilson, NHM
    Bernstein, D
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED TRANSIT SCHEDULING, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 471 : 325 - 346
  • [3] Optimal real-time control strategies for rail transit operations during disruptions
    O'Dell, SW
    Wilson, NHM
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED TRANSIT SCHEDULING, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 471 : 299 - 323
  • [4] Control Strategies and Comparison of the Dynamic Voltage Restorer
    Strzelecki, R.
    Benysek, G.
    [J]. PQ2008: 2008 POWER QUALITY AND SUPPLY RELIABILITY, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 79 - +
  • [5] An integrated modeling system for dynamic operations control and real-time transit information
    Shalaby, A
    Farhan, A
    [J]. IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 874 - 879
  • [6] Control strategies for transit priority
    Skabardonis, A
    [J]. ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND AUTOMATED HIGHWAY SYSTEMS 2000: HIGHWAY OPERATIONS, CAPACITY, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL, 2000, (1727): : 20 - 26
  • [7] Pareto efficient strategies for regulating public transit operations
    Qiong Tian
    Hai Yang
    Hai-Jun Huang
    [J]. Public Transport, 2012, 3 (3) : 199 - 212
  • [8] Pareto efficient strategies for regulating public transit operations
    Tian, Qiong
    Yang, Hai
    Huang, Hai-Jun
    [J]. PUBLIC TRANSPORT, 2012, 3 (03) : 199 - 212
  • [9] Distributed holding control of bus transit operations
    Zhao, JM
    Dessouky, M
    Bukkapatnam, S
    [J]. 2001 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS - PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 976 - 981
  • [10] Dynamic Transit Scheduling of Medical Goods in Regular Operations
    [J]. Yan, Shangyao, 2016, Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering (28):