Evaluation of Oral Cavity DNA Extraction Methods on Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota

被引:34
|
作者
Rosenbaum, Jennifer [1 ]
Usyk, Mykhaylo [1 ]
Chen, Zigui [1 ,2 ]
Zolnik, Christine P. [1 ,3 ]
Jones, Heidi E. [4 ]
Waldron, Levi [4 ]
Dowd, Jennifer B. [4 ,9 ]
Thorpe, Lorna E. [4 ,10 ]
Burk, Robert D. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Dept Microbiol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Long Isl Univ, Dept Biol, Brooklyn, NY USA
[4] CUNY, Grad Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Policy, New York, NY USA
[5] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[6] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Womens Hlth, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[7] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[8] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[9] Kings Coll London, Dept Global Hlth & Social Med, London, England
[10] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth, New York, NY USA
关键词
GENOMIC DNA; SAMPLES; QUALITY; HEALTH; PERIODONTITIS; ASSOCIATIONS; DIVERSITY; ALIGNMENT; DISEASE; YIELD;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-018-38049-6
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the most effective method of DNA extraction of oral mouthwash samples for use in microbiome studies that utilize next generation sequencing (NGS). Eight enzymatic and mechanical DNA extraction methods were tested. Extracted DNA was amplified using barcoded primers targeting the V6 variable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and the ITS1 region of the fungal ribosomal gene cluster and sequenced using the Illumina NGS platform. Sequenced reads were analyzed using QIIME and R. The eight methods yielded significantly different quantities of DNA (p < 0.001), with the phenol-chloroform extraction method producing the highest total yield. There were no significant differences in observed bacterial or fungal Shannon diversity (p = 0.64, p = 0.93 respectively) by extraction method. Bray-Curtis beta-diversity did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the eight extraction methods based on bacterial (R-2 = 0.086, p = 1.00) and fungal (R-2 = 0.039, p = 1.00) assays. No differences were seen between methods with or without bead-beating. These data indicate that choice of DNA extraction method affect total DNA recovery without significantly affecting the observed microbiome.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Oral Cavity DNA Extraction Methods on Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota
    Jennifer Rosenbaum
    Mykhaylo Usyk
    Zigui Chen
    Christine P. Zolnik
    Heidi E. Jones
    Levi Waldron
    Jennifer B. Dowd
    Lorna E. Thorpe
    Robert D. Burk
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [2] The Impact of DNA Extraction Methods on Stool Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota Community Recovery
    Fiedorova, Kristyna
    Radvansky, Matej
    Nemcova, Eva
    Grombirikova, Hana
    Bosak, Juraj
    Cernochova, Michaela
    Lexa, Matej
    Smajs, David
    Freiberger, Tomas
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [3] Evaluation of Lysis Methods for the Extraction of Bacterial DNA for Analysis of the Vaginal Microbiota
    Gill, Christina
    van de Wijgert, Janneke H. H. M.
    Blow, Frances
    Darby, Alistair C.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [4] Evaluation of DNA extraction methods for PCR detection of fungal and bacterial contamination in cocoa extracts
    Tortajada, Marta
    Vicente Martinez-Culebras, Pedro
    Navarro, Veronica
    Monzo, Honorato
    Ramon, Daniel
    EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 230 (01) : 79 - 87
  • [5] Evaluation of DNA extraction methods for PCR detection of fungal and bacterial contamination in cocoa extracts
    Marta Tortajada
    Pedro Vicente Martínez-Culebras
    Verónica Navarro
    Honorato Monzó
    Daniel Ramón
    European Food Research and Technology, 2009, 230 : 79 - 87
  • [6] Combined bacterial and fungal intestinal microbiota analyses: Impact of storage conditions and DNA extraction protocols
    Angebault, Cecile
    Ghozlane, Amine
    Volant, Stevenn
    Botterel, Francoise
    d'Enfert, Christophe
    Bougnoux, Marie-Elisabeth
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (08):
  • [7] Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities
    Vesty, Anna
    Biswas, Kristi
    Taylor, Michael W.
    Gear, Kim
    Douglas, Richard G.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [8] Evaluation of DNA extraction methods to detect bacterial targets in aerosol samples
    Dunbar, John
    Gallegos-Graves, La Verne
    Gans, Jason
    Morse, Stephen A.
    Pillai, Segaran
    Anderson, Kevin
    Hodge, David R.
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 153 : 48 - 53
  • [9] Determinants and Interactions of Oral Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota in Healthy Chinese Adults
    Cheung, Man Kit
    Chan, Jason Y. K.
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Wong, Po Yee
    Lei, Pu
    Cai, Liuyang
    Lan, Linlin
    Ho, Wendy C. S.
    Yeung, Apple C. M.
    Chan, Paul K. S.
    Chen, Zigui
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [10] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE ORAL MICROBIOTA OF MICE
    RODRIGUE, L
    MARION, D
    TRUDEL, L
    BARTHE, C
    LAVOIE, MC
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 1989, 10 (02) : 71 - 82