A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery

被引:136
|
作者
Wiewelhove, Thimo [1 ]
Doeweling, Alexander [1 ]
Schneider, Christoph [1 ]
Hottenrott, Laura [1 ]
Meyer, Tim [2 ]
Kellmann, Michael [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Pfeiffer, Mark [5 ]
Ferrauti, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Bochum, Germany
[2] Saarland Univ, Inst Sports & Prevent Med, Saarbrucken, Germany
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Human Movement Studies, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Sports Sci, Dept Theory & Pract Performance Sports, Mainz, Germany
关键词
rolling massage; sprint; jump; strength; flexibility; muscle pain; MYOFASCIAL-RELEASE; ROLLER-MASSAGER; MUSCLE RECOVERY; JUMP PERFORMANCE; SELF-MASSAGE; ACUTE BOUT; HIP RANGE; MOTION; STRENGTH; PAIN;
D O I
10.3389/fphys.2019.00376
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Foam rolling is thought to improve muscular performance and flexibility as well as to alleviate muscle fatigue and soreness. For this reason, foam rolling has become a popular intervention in all kinds of sport settings used to increase the efficiency of training or competition preparation as well as to speed post-exercise recovery. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of foam rolling applied before (pre-rolling as a warm-up activity) and after (post-rolling as a recovery strategy) exercise on sprint, jump, and strength performance as well as on flexibility and muscle pain outcomes and to identify whether self-massage with a foam roller or a roller massager is more effective. A comprehensive and structured literature search was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, PEDro, and Cochrane Library search engines. Twenty-one studies were located that met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen studies used pre-rolling, while seven studies used post-rolling. Pre-rolling resulted in a small improvement in sprint performance (+0.7%, g = 0.28) and flexibility (+4.0%, g = 0.34), whereas the effect on jump (-1.9%, g = 0.09) and strength performance (+1.8%, g = 0.12) was negligible. Post-rolling slightly attenuated exercise-induced decreases in sprint (+3.1%, g = 0.34) and strength performance (+3.9 %, g = 0.21). It also reduced muscle pain perception (+6.0%, g = 0.47), whereas its effect on jump performance (-0.2%, g = 0.06) was trivial. Of the twenty-one studies, fourteen used foam rollers, while the other seven used roller massage bars/sticks. A tendency was found for foam rollers to offer larger effects on the recovery of strength performance (+5.6%, g = 0.27 vs. -0.1%, g = -0.01) than roller massagers. The differences in the effects between foam rolling devices in terms of pre-rolling did not seem to be of practical relevance (overall performance: +2.7 %, g = 0.11 vs. +0.4%, g = 0.21; flexibility: +5.0%, g = 0.32 vs. +1.6%, g = 0.39). Overall, it was determined that the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery are rather minor and partly negligible, but can be relevant in some cases (e.g., to increase sprint performance and flexibility or to reduce muscle pain sensation). Evidence seems to justify the widespread use of foam rolling as a warm-up activity rather than a recovery tool.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on range of motion, recovery and markers of athletic performance
    Skinner, Brendon
    Moss, Richard
    Hammond, Lucy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2020, 24 (03) : 105 - 122
  • [2] A Comparison of the Effects of Foam Rolling and Stretching on Physical Performance. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Konrad, Andreas
    Tilp, Markus
    Nakamura, Masatoshi
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [3] Foam Rolling Training Effects on Range of Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Konrad, Andreas
    Nakamura, Masatoshi
    Tilp, Markus
    Donti, Olyvia
    Behm, David G.
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 52 (10) : 2523 - 2535
  • [4] Foam Rolling Training Effects on Range of Motion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Andreas Konrad
    Masatoshi Nakamura
    Markus Tilp
    Olyvia Donti
    David G. Behm
    [J]. Sports Medicine, 2022, 52 : 2523 - 2535
  • [5] The Accumulated Effects of Foam Rolling Combined with Stretching on Range of Motion and Physical Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Konrad, Andreas
    Nakamura, Masatoshi
    Bernsteiner, Daniel
    Tilp, Markus Tilp
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE AND MEDICINE, 2021, 20 (03) : 535 - 545
  • [6] Effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery: A systematic review of the literature to guide practitioners on the use of foam rolling
    Hendricks, Sharief
    Hill, Hayd'n
    den Hollander, Steve
    Lombard, Wayne
    Parker, Romy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2020, 24 (02) : 151 - 174
  • [7] The Effects of Foam Rolling Training on Performance Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis including Controlled and Randomized Controlled Trials
    Konrad, Andreas
    Nakamura, Masatoshi
    Behm, David George
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (18)
  • [8] Does Vibration Foam Roller Influence Performance and Recovery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Alonso-Calvete, Alejandra
    Lorenzo-Martinez, Miguel
    Padron-Cabo, Alexis
    Perez-Ferreiros, Alexandra
    Kalen, Anton
    Abelairas-Gomez, Cristian
    Rey, Ezequiel
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE-OPEN, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [9] Does Vibration Foam Roller Influence Performance and Recovery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Alejandra Alonso-Calvete
    Miguel Lorenzo-Martínez
    Alexis Padrón-Cabo
    Alexandra Pérez-Ferreirós
    Anton Kalén
    Cristian Abelairas-Gómez
    Ezequiel Rey
    [J]. Sports Medicine - Open, 2022, 8
  • [10] Acute Effects of Foam Rolling on Range of Motion in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review with Multilevel Meta-analysis
    Wilke, Jan
    Mueller, Anna-Lena
    Giesche, Florian
    Power, Gerard
    Ahmedi, Hamid
    Behm, David G.
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 50 (02) : 387 - 402