Assessing soil hydrophobicity and its variability through the soil profile using two different methods

被引:41
|
作者
Buczko, U [1 ]
Bens, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Brandenburg Tech Univ Cottbus, Chair Soil Protect & Recultivat, D-03013 Cottbus, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2005.0183
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil water repellency (hydrophobicity) and its heterogeneity in field soils under natural conditions can cause unstable wetting fronts, preferential flow, and accelerated solute leaching. For assessing possible effects of water repellency and its heterogeneity on flow processes in a given soil, investigations of both overall levels of repellency and its variability are necessary. The purpose of this study was to assess water repellency levels and its variability in sandy soils under a pine-beech forest transformation chronosequence. Water repellency was quantified at four plots for soil depths between 0 and 160 cm on disturbed and oven-dried samples with the water drop penetration time (WDPT) test and the sessile drop method (SDM) (contact angles [CAs]). Intrasample variability was quantified with a heterogeneity index (RI) which is based on the difference between the 90 and 10% quantile, divided by the overall range of encountered values. For both methods and all plots, repellency levels were highest in the topsoil layer (0- to 10-cm depth) and decreased clearly with increasing depth. Larger maximum values of intrasample variability were determined with the WDPT method compared to the SDM. When the proportion of estimated measurement error is subtracted from heterogeneity values, the average heterogeneity is higher for log(WDPT) (mean 8.9%) than for CAs (mean 6.7%). The preferential flow which was observed at this site despite the ostensible homogeneity of the soil may be due to the high variability of hydrophobicity, although other factors (e.g., runnel flow) may contribute to this as well.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 727
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing soil compaction with two different methods of soil bulk density measurement in oil palm plantation soil
    Lestariningsih, I. D.
    Widianto
    Hairiah, K.
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR HUMAN SECURITY, SUSTAIN 2012, 2013, 17 : 172 - 178
  • [2] Comparing Soil C Stocks from Soil Profile Data Using Four Different Methods
    Bonfatti, Benito R.
    Hartemink, Alfred E.
    Giasson, Elvio
    DIGITAL SOIL MORPHOMETRICS, 2016, : 315 - 329
  • [3] Do different methods for measuring the hydrophobicity of soil aggregates give the same trends in soil amended with residue?
    Cosentino, D.
    Hallett, P. D.
    Michel, J. C.
    Chenu, C.
    GEODERMA, 2010, 159 (1-2) : 221 - 227
  • [4] Spatial variability of soil pH as influenced by different soil sampling methods and geostatistical techniques
    Staugaitis, Gediminas
    Sumskis, Donatas
    ZEMDIRBYSTE-AGRICULTURE, 2011, 98 (03) : 323 - 332
  • [5] Determination of hydrophobicity and optical properties of soil humic acids isolated by different methods
    Trubetskaya, Olga E.
    Trubetskoj, Oleg A.
    Voyard, Guillaume
    Richard, Claire
    JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 2013, 132 : 84 - 89
  • [6] Assessing the impact of soil amendments made of processed biowaste digestate on soil macrofauna using two different earthworm species
    Ross, Christina-Luise
    Wilken, Verena
    Krueck, Stefanie
    Nielsen, Kerstin
    Sensel-Gunke, Karen
    Ellmer, Frank
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (14) : 1939 - 1950
  • [7] Evaluation of Soil Infiltration Variability in Compacted and Uncompacted Soil Using Two Devices
    Jobbagy, Jan
    Kristof, Koloman
    Angelovic, Michal
    Zsembeli, Jozsef
    WATER, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [8] Soil water variability and its influence on transpirable soil water fraction with two grape varieties under different rainfall regimes
    Ramos, M. C.
    Martinez-Casasnovas, J. A.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 185 : 253 - 262
  • [9] Spatial variability of soil water retention curve in different soil layers and its affecting factors
    Liu J.
    Ma X.
    Zhang Z.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2010, 41 (01): : 46 - 52
  • [10] Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methods
    Vogelmann, Eduardo Saldanha
    Reichert, Jose Miguel
    Prevedello, Juliana
    Awe, Gabriel Oladele
    Reinert, Dalvan Jose
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2015, 45 (02): : 260 - 266