Socio-ecological network structures from process graphs

被引:8
|
作者
Lao, Angelyn [1 ]
Cabezas, Heriberto [2 ,3 ]
Orosz, Akos [4 ]
Friedler, Ferenc [3 ,5 ]
Tan, Raymond [6 ]
机构
[1] De La Salle Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Manila, Philippines
[2] Univ Miskolc, Res Inst Appl Earth Sci, Miskolc, Hungary
[3] Pazmany Peter Catholic Univ, Inst Proc Syst Engn & Sustainabil, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Univ Pannonia, Dept Comp Sci & Syst Technol, Veszprem, Hungary
[5] Szecheny Istvan Univ, Debrecen, Hungary
[6] De La Salle Univ, Chem Engn Dept, Manila, Philippines
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 08期
关键词
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; THEORETIC APPROACH; HABITAT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0232384
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We propose a process graph (P-graph) approach to develop ecosystem networks from knowledge of the properties of the component species. Originally developed as a process engineering tool for designing industrial plants, the P-graph framework has key advantages over conventional ecological network analysis techniques based on input-output models. A P-graph is a bipartite graph consisting of two types of nodes, which we propose to represent components of an ecosystem. Compartments within ecosystems (e.g., organism species) are represented by one class of nodes, while the roles or functions that they play relative to other compartments are represented by a second class of nodes. This bipartite graph representation enables a powerful, unambiguous representation of relationships among ecosystem compartments, which can come in tangible (e.g., mass flow in predation) or intangible form (e.g., symbiosis). For example, within a P-graph, the distinct roles of bees as pollinators for some plants and as prey for some animals can be explicitly represented, which would not otherwise be possible using conventional ecological network analysis. After a discussion of the mapping of ecosystems into P-graph, we also discuss how this framework can be used to guide understanding of complex networks that exist in nature. Two component algorithms of P-graph, namely maximal structure generation (MSG) and solution structure generation (SSG), are shown to be particularly useful for ecological network analysis. These algorithms enable candidate ecosystem networks to be deduced based on current scientific knowledge on the individual ecosystem components. This method can be used to determine the (a) effects of loss of specific ecosystem compartments due to extinction, (b) potential efficacy of ecosystem reconstruction efforts, and (c) maximum sustainable exploitation of human ecosystem services by humans. We illustrate the use of P-graph for the analysis of ecosystem compartment loss using a small-scale stylized case study, and further propose a new criticality index that can be easily derived from SSG results.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL PRODUCT
    CRACCO, E
    ROSTENNE, J
    [J]. MSU BUSINESS TOPICS-MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, 1971, 19 (03): : 27 - 34
  • [2] Socio-ecological anthropology
    Novozhilova, E. G.
    [J]. SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2011, (03): : 13 - 23
  • [3] A standardization process for mental model analysis in socio-ecological systems
    Mario Siqueiros-Garcia, J.
    Lerner, Amy M.
    Eakin, Hallie C.
    Hernandez Aguilar, Bertha
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2019, 112 : 108 - 111
  • [4] Developing socio-ecological scenarios: A participatory process for engaging stakeholders
    Allan, Andrew
    Barbour, Emily
    Nicholls, Robert J.
    Hutton, Craig
    Lim, Michelle
    Salehin, Mashfiqus
    Rahman, Md Munsur
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 807
  • [5] Assessing the biogeographical and socio-ecological representativeness of the ILTER site network
    Wohner, Christoph
    Ohnemus, Thomas
    Zacharias, Steffen
    Mollenhauer, Hannes
    Ellis, Erle C.
    Klug, Hermann
    Shibata, Hideaki
    Mirtl, Michael
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 127
  • [6] Global production network mapping for transforming socio-ecological systems
    Van Holt, Tracy
    Weisman, Wendy
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 20 : 61 - 66
  • [7] Macroeconomics of socio-ecological transition
    Behringer, Jan
    Watt, Andrew
    Gechert, Sebastian
    Nikolaidi, Maria
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC POLICIES-INTERVENTION, 2022, 19 (03): : 335 - 337
  • [8] Socio-ecological contagion in Veganville
    Elliot, Thomas
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2022, 51
  • [9] Socio-ecological indicators for sustainability
    Azar, C
    Holmberg, J
    Lindgren, K
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (02) : 89 - 112
  • [10] A SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO PERCEPTION
    Gross, Elizabeth B.
    Proffitt, Dennis R.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIA, 2014, 57 (02) : 102 - 114