Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after lower extremity fracture surgery: a pilot study

被引:18
|
作者
Dingemans, Siem A. [1 ]
Birnie, Merel F. N. [1 ]
Backes, Manouk [1 ]
de Jong, Vincent M. [1 ]
Luitse, Jan S. [1 ]
Goslings, J. Carel [1 ]
Schepers, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Trauma Unit, Dept Surg, Meibergdreef 9,POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Negative pressure wound therapy; Postoperative wound infection; Lower extremity fracture surgery; Prophylactic; Closed incision; SURGICAL INCISIONS; TRAUMA; INFECTIONS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-018-3781-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Infectious complications following lower extremity fracture surgery are a major concern and account for a substantial socio-economic burden to society. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the feasibility of a new portable single-use negative pressure wound therapy device in patients undergoing major foot ankle surgery. Methods Patients undergoing major foot ankle fracture surgery at a single level 1 trauma centre were eligible for this prospective case series. Patient characteristics were collected, as were fracture and surgical characteristics. Primary outcome was surgical site infection within 30 days as classified by the criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Patients in the prospective cohort were case-matched with a historical cohort from the same institution. Results Sixty patients were included. In seven patients, the NPWT failed and treatment was ceased. Mean age was 44 years and 85% was ASA 1; 43% of the patients were actively smoking. Indications for surgery were midfoot, calcaneal, talar, and ankle fractures. In 53 patients, four (7.5%) surgical site infections occurred, two superficial (3.3%) and two (3.3%) deep infections. For 47 patients, a match was available. The incidence of surgical site infection did not statistically significantly differ between the prospective cohort and retrospective matched cohort (4.3 versus 14.9%, p = 0.29, respectively). This was also the case when looking at superficial and deep surgical site infections separately (0 versus 8.5%, p = 0.08, and 4.3 versus 6.4%, respectively). Conclusion We have observed surgical site infections in 7.5% of the patients with the use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy. The incidence of surgical site infections was not statistically significantly lower compared to a matched historical cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 753
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after lower extremity fracture surgery: a pilot study
    Siem A. Dingemans
    Merel F. N. Birnie
    Manouk Backes
    Vincent M. de Jong
    Jan S. Luitse
    J. Carel Goslings
    Tim Schepers
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 747 - 753
  • [2] Correction to: Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after lower extremity fracture surgery: a pilot study
    Siem A. Dingemans
    Merel F. N. Birnie
    Manouk Backes
    Vincent M. de Jong
    Jan S. Luitse
    J. Carel Goslings
    Tim Schepers
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 2287 - 2287
  • [3] Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after lower extremity fracture surgery: a pilot study (vol 42, pg 747, 2018)
    Dingemans, Siem A.
    Birnie, Merel F. N.
    Backes, Manouk
    de Jong, Vincent M.
    Luitse, Jan S.
    Goslings, J. Carel
    Schepers, Tim
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (09) : 2287 - 2287
  • [4] Prophylactic Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Dressing after Major Lower Extremity Amputation: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Vaddavalli, Venkata Vineeth
    Savlania, Ajay
    Behera, Arunanshu
    Rastogi, Ashu
    Kaman, Lileshwar
    Abuji, Kishore
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 64 (05) : 579 - 580
  • [5] Prophylactic Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Dressing After Major Lower Extremity Amputation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Vaddavalli, Venkata Vineeth
    Savlania, Ajay
    Behera, Arunanshu
    Kaman, Lileswar
    Rastogi, Ashu
    Abuji, Kishore
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (04) : 14S - 14S
  • [6] Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: A Pilot Study
    Kumar, Devesh
    Upadhyay, Sachin
    Varma, Hashmukh Shantilal
    Thakur, Darwin Kumar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (07)
  • [7] Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After High-Risk Lower Extremity Fractures
    Stannard, James P.
    Volgas, David A.
    McGwin, Gerald, III
    Stewart, Rena L.
    Obremskey, William
    Moore, Thomas
    Anglen, Jeffrey O.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2012, 26 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [8] Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Laparotomy for Gynecologic Surgery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Leitao, Mario M., Jr.
    Zhou, Qin C.
    Schiavone, Maria B.
    Cowan, Renee A.
    Smith, Evan S.
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Veith, Mitchell
    Rafizadeh, Michael
    Curran, Katherine
    Ramesh, Bhavani
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Brown, Amy K.
    Cosin, Jonathan A.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Martino, Martin A.
    Mueller, Jennifer J.
    Roche, Kara Long
    Jewell, Elizabeth L.
    Broach, Vance
    Lambrou, Nicholas C.
    Diaz, John P.
    Zivanovic, Oliver
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (02): : 334 - 341
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a pilot study of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy
    Heard, Christopher
    Chaboyer, Wendy
    Anderson, Vinah
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2017, 26 (01) : 79 - 84
  • [10] Pilot randomized trial of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in obese women after cesarean delivery
    Tuuli, Methodius Gamuo
    Martin, Shannon
    Stout, Molly J.
    Steiner, Holly L.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Longo, Sherri
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Tita, Alan T.
    Macones, George A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S245 - S245