Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first molars: Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index

被引:6
|
作者
Booij, Johan W.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bronkhorst, Ewald M. [4 ]
Livas, Christos [5 ]
Ren, Yijin [1 ,6 ]
Kuijpers, Mette A. R. [7 ]
Katsaros, Christos [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthodont, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bern, Med Fac, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Indonesia, Fac Dent, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Dent, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Dent Clin Zwolle, Zwolle, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, WJ Kolff Inst Biomed Engn & Mat Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Dent Orthodont & Craniofacial Biol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
angle class II; longitudinal study; maxillary first molar extraction; PAR index; treatment outcome; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; PREMOLAR EXTRACTION; STABILITY; RETENTION; PREVALENCE; EFFICIENCY; APPLIANCE;
D O I
10.1111/ocr.12412
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate occlusal result and post-treatment changes after orthodontic extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with a Class II division 1 malocclusion. Setting and Sample Retrospective longitudinal study in a private practice, with outcome evaluation by an independent academic hospital. Ninety-six patients (53 males, 43 females) consecutively treated by one orthodontist with maxillary first permanent molar extraction were studied, divided into three facial types, based on pre-treatment cephalometric values: hypodivergent (n = 18), normodivergent (n = 21) and hyperdivergent (n = 57). Methods Occlusal outcome was scored on dental casts at T1 (pre-treatment), T2 (post-treatment) and T3 (mean follow-up 2.5 +/- 0.9 years) using the weighted Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. The paired samplettest and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. Results PAR was reduced by 95.7% and 89.9% at T2 and T3, respectively, compared with the start of treatment. The largest post-treatment changes were found for overjet and buccal occlusion. Linear regression analysis did not reveal a clear effect (R-Square 0.074) of age, sex, PAR score at T1, incremental PAR score T2-T1, overjet and overbite at T1, and facial type on the changes after treatment (incremental PAR score T3-T2). Conclusions The occlusal outcome achieved after Class II division 1 treatment with maxillary first permanent molar extractions was maintained to a large extent over a mean post-treatment follow-up of 2.5 years. Limited changes after treatment were found, for which no risk factors could be discerned.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 110
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first permanent molars: cephalometric evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes
    Booij, Johan Willem
    Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Rangel, Frits A.
    Livas, Christos
    Ren, Yijin
    Katsaros, Christos
    Ongkosuwito, Edwin M.
    AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC JOURNAL, 2021, 37 (02): : 294 - 310
  • [2] Extraction of maxillary second molars in the treatment of Class II malocclusion
    Basdra, EK
    Stellzig, A
    Komposch, G
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1996, 66 (04) : 287 - 292
  • [3] Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR index
    Birkeland, K
    Furevik, J
    Boe, OE
    Wisth, PJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1997, 19 (03) : 279 - 288
  • [5] Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion
    Stalpers, Mattijs J. P.
    Booij, Johan W.
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
    Katsaros, Christos
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 132 (03) : 316 - 323
  • [6] Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars
    Janson, Guilherme
    Fuziy, Acacio
    de Freitas, Marcos Roberto
    Castanha Henriques, Jose Fernando
    de Almeidac, Renato Rodrigues
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 132 (06) : 729.e1 - 729.e8
  • [7] Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment
    Bishara, SE
    Ortho, D
    Cummins, DM
    Zaher, AR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1997, 111 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [8] Treatment of a Class II Division 1 malocclusion with macrodontia of the maxillary central incisors
    Hellekant, M
    Twetman, S
    Carlsson, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2001, 119 (06) : 654 - 659
  • [9] Treatment of a Class II Division 1 malocclusion
    Vaught, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 118 (02) : 229 - 233
  • [10] Extraction of maxillary first molars improves second and third molar inclinations in Class II Division 1 malocclusion
    Livas, Christos
    Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
    Booij, Johan Willem
    Katsaros, Christos
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 140 (03) : 377 - 382