Fluid-Structure Interaction Study of Coronary Artery Disease Biomechanics

被引:0
|
作者
Steadman, Elisabeth
Yin, Wei
机构
[1] Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook
来源
FASEB JOURNAL | 2022年 / 36卷
关键词
D O I
10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R5095
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Coronary artery disease (CAD) kills 1 in 7 in the United States. Atherosclerosis and thrombosis are both disease states that are impacted by biomechanical conditions in the blood vessels. Platelets and vascular endothelial cells are known to respond to their mechanical environments, which can be altered around a coronary stenosis. Certain pertinent mechanical parameters, such as vascular wall shear stress and strain, can be difficult or impossible to measure directly in vivo.Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models and Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) models are often used to assess coronary artery biomechanics. In this study, we developed three FSI models based on the computed tomography data from a patient: a normal model, a severe stenosis model with a 71% diameter occlusion (which would be a candidate for intervention), and a mild stenosis model (50% diameter occlusion, which would not be considered clinically severe). Our hypothesis was that the high-resolution FSI model could reveal small changes in coronary biomechanics at the cellular level (microscopic scale), which may be used as a biomarker/indicator for endothelial cell and platelet activation at the early stage of disease development. FSI simulations were conducted in COMSOL Multiphysics. Time-dependent velocity and pressure boundary conditions were applied at the inlet and outlet of the fluid domain, respectively. A five-parameter Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic material model was used to model the material properties of the artery. A time-dependent pressure boundary condition was applied to the outside of the vessel, mimicking squeezing of the cardiac muscle in areas of myocardial bridging. In the region of interest, a spatial resolution of less than 40 µm was achieved. This is comparable to the size of vascular endothelial cells (which can range in size from 20-100 µm), allowing us to capture hemodynamic and solid mechanical behavior at the cellular level. In the normal geometry, wall shear stress (WSS) values peaked at 1.51 Pa. In the 71% stenosis throat, transient WSS could reach 200 Pa, while in the 50% stenosis throat, the maximum WSS was less than 5 Pa. In the recirculation zone of the 71% stenosis, WSS peaked at 4.66 Pa, while in the recirculation zone of the 50% stenosis WSS reduced to 0.83 Pa, which is pathologically low. Time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) was 0.62+0.002 Pa (average + standard error) in the normal model, 1.60+0.004 Pa in the 50% stenosis model, and 7.47+0.017 Pa in the 71% stenosis model. Time-averaged wall shear stress gradient (TAWSSG) was 0.018+6.25*10-5 N/m in the normal model, 0.150+3.4*10-4 N/m in the 50% stenosis model, and 0.970+0.002 N/m in the 71% stenosis model. Radial strain in the normal, 71% stenosis throat, 50% stenosis throat, 71% recirculation zone, and 50% recirculation zone peaked at 7.5%, 4.0%, 6.3%, 0.5%, and 5.1% respectively, and the circumferential strain peaked at 8.9%, 4.4%, 6.6%, 0.6%, and 4.2% respectively. In summary, we were able to develop mesoscopic FSI models that can provide microscopic hemodynamic information at the cellular level. Such information can be used in the in vitro models to study biomechanical pathways associated with coronary artery atherosclerosis and thrombosis; it may also be used as biomarkers at the early stage of atherosclerosis development. © FASEB.
引用
收藏
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A spatiotemporal analysis of the left coronary artery biomechanics using fluid-structure interaction models
    Fandaros, Marina
    Li, Yu Yulee
    Cao, Jie Jane
    Yin, Wei
    [J]. MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2023, 61 (06) : 1533 - 1548
  • [2] In Vivo Based Fluid-Structure Interaction Biomechanics of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery
    Carpenter, Harry J.
    Gholipour, Alireza
    Ghayesh, Mergen H.
    Zander, Anthony C.
    Psaltis, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (08):
  • [3] Fluid-structure interaction with applications in biomechanics
    Hron, Jaroslav
    Madlik, Martin
    [J]. NONLINEAR ANALYSIS-REAL WORLD APPLICATIONS, 2007, 8 (05) : 1431 - 1458
  • [4] A Fluid-Structure Interaction Model of the Left Coronary Artery
    Meza, Daphne
    Rubenstein, David A.
    Yin, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (12):
  • [5] Considering the Influence of Coronary Motion on Artery-Specific Biomechanics Using Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation
    Fogell, Nicholas A. T.
    Patel, Miten
    Yang, Pan
    Ruis, Roosje M.
    Garcia, David B.
    Naser, Jarka
    Savvopoulos, Fotios
    Davies Taylor, Clint
    Post, Anouk L.
    Pedrigi, Ryan M.
    de Silva, Ranil
    Krams, Rob
    [J]. ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 51 (09) : 1950 - 1964
  • [6] A Study of the Fluid-Structure Interaction of the Plaque Circumferential Distribution in the Left Coronary Artery
    Du, Yepeng
    Zhang, Lili
    Hou, Zhanju
    Liu, Jian
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [7] Compliant biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A fluid-structure interaction study
    Scotti, Christine M.
    Finol, Ender A.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2007, 85 (11-14) : 1097 - 1113
  • [8] Biomechanics of Acute Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly: A Fluid-Structure Interaction Study
    Zhou, Zhou
    Li, Xiaogai
    Kleiven, Svein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2019, 36 (13) : 2099 - 2108
  • [9] Cellular biomechanics: Fluid-structure interaction or structural simulation?
    Papadakis, L.
    Karatsis, E.
    Michalakis, K.
    Tsouknidas, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2022, 136
  • [10] Fluid-structure interaction analysis of the left coronary artery with variable angulation
    Dong, Jingliang
    Sun, Zhonghua
    Inthavong, Kiao
    Tu, Jiyuan
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 18 (14) : 1500 - 1508