Palatal needle-free anesthesia for upper molars extraction. A randomized clinical trial

被引:5
|
作者
Amorim, Klinger de Souza [1 ]
Franz-Montan, Michelle [1 ]
Groppo, Francisco Carlos [1 ]
Muniz, Bruno Vilela [1 ]
Macena de Araujo, Jaiza Samara [1 ]
Ferreira Santana, Jose Vanison [2 ]
Gercina Carvalho Dantas, Anne Caroline [2 ]
de Paula, Eneida [3 ]
de Almeida Souza, Liane Maciel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Pharmacol Anesthesiol & Therapeut Dept, Piracicaba Dent Sch, 901 Limeira Ave, BR-13414903 Piracibaba, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sergipe, Oral Surg & Anesthesiol Area Dent Dept, BR-49060108 Cidade Nova, Sergipe, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Biol Inst, Biochem & Tissue Biol Dept, St Monteiro Lobato 255, BR-13083862 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
EMLA; Dental extraction; Lipo somes; Local anesthetics; Topical gel; LIPOSOME-ENCAPSULATED ROPIVACAINE; TOPICAL ANESTHESIA; EFFICACY; GEL; ANXIETY; MUCOSA; DURATION; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2020.05.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the ability of liposomal and non-liposomal lidocaine and prilocaine in hydrogel formulations to promote topical anesthesia in palatal mucosa during upper molar extractions. Methods: In this randomized, cross over, triple-blinded clinical trial, a liposomal and a non-liposomal formulation of the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics, 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine, were used to promote palatal anesthesia without the local anesthetic infiltration during bilateral upper molars extractions. Results: From the total of 40 patients included in this study, the non-liposomal eutectic lidocaineprilocaine formulation failed in 40% of cases, unlike the liposomal formulation, which was effective for all patients (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the liposomal formulation (26.75 +/- 7,47 min) induced longer anesthesia duration (t-test, p < 0.0001) than the non-liposomal formulation (16.78 +/- 4.75 min). No mucosal ulceration or discomfort was reported for both formulations. Conclusion: The liposomal formulation was able to induce adequate anesthesia in palatal mucosa during dental extraction, avoiding the local anesthetic infiltration. For the first time, a topical formulation allowed upper molars surgical removal without injection of any local anesthetic agent into palatal mucosa in adults. (C) 2020 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 819
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Needle-free anesthetic polymeric device for dental anesthesia in children: A randomized clinical trial
    Inacio, Gisele Carvalho
    Pedrazzi, Vinicius
    de Freitas, Osvaldo
    Ferreira Duarte, Maira Peres
    Bezerra da Silva, Raquel Assed
    Nelson-Filho, Paulo
    Garcia de Paula-Silva, Francisco Wanderley
    de Carvalho, Fabricio Kitazono
    Lucisano, Marilia Pacifico
    de Oueiroz, Alexandra Mussolino
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 36 (02): : 69 - 74
  • [2] Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Needle-Free Anesthesia and Conventional Anesthesia in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Jaju, Krishna Kanth
    Nasim, Iffat
    Choudhari, Sahil
    Sandeep, Hima
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [3] Efficacy of articaine anesthesia with needle-free/Comfort-in method and conventional needle injection in dental patients with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial
    Nogueira, Amanda Palmeira Arruda
    Ferreira, Meire Coelho
    Maia, Claudia de Castro Rizzi
    Goncalves, Bruna Lais Lins
    Maia Filho, Etevaldo
    Costa, Cyrene Piazera
    Gavini, Giulio
    Grazziotin-Soares, Renata
    Carvalho, Ceci Nunes
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (03)
  • [4] Efficacy of articaine anesthesia with needle-free/Comfort-in method and conventional needle injection in dental patients with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial
    Amanda Palmeira Arruda Nogueira
    Meire Coelho Ferreira
    Cláudia de Castro Rizzi MAIA
    Bruna Laís Lins Gonçalves
    Etevaldo Maia Filho
    Cyrene Piazera Costa
    Giulio Gavini
    Renata Grazziotin-Soares
    Ceci Nunes Carvalho
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 28
  • [5] Needle-Free Jet Lidocaine Administration for Preinjection Anesthesia in Trigger Finger Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Earp, Brandon E.
    Stanbury, Spencer J.
    Mora, Ariana N.
    Blazar, Philip E.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 42 (08): : 618 - 622
  • [6] A Randomized Double Blind Trial of a Needle-free Injection System to Topical Anesthesia for Infant Lumbar Puncture
    Adelgais, Kathleen
    Raghavan, Vidya
    Caltagirone, Ryan
    Roosevelt, Genie
    PEDIATRICS, 2018, 142
  • [7] Needle-Free Jet Injection of Lidocaine for Local Anesthesia During Lumbar Puncture A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ferayorni, Angelique
    Yniguez, Robert
    Bryson, Matt
    Bulloch, Blake
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2012, 28 (07) : 687 - 690
  • [8] The effect of pre-anesthesia with a needle-free system versus topical anesthesia on injection pain of the inferior alveolar nerve block: a randomized clinical trial
    Sinem Yıldırım
    Müge Tokuç
    Merve Nur Aydın
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020, 24 : 4355 - 4361
  • [9] The effect of pre-anesthesia with a needle-free system versus topical anesthesia on injection pain of the inferior alveolar nerve block: a randomized clinical trial
    Yildirim, Sinem
    Tokuc, Muge
    Aydin, Merve Nur
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (12) : 4355 - 4361
  • [10] Needle-free anesthesia: clinical efficacy of a mucoadhesive patch for atraumatic anesthesia in dental procedures
    Adami, Larisse Eduardo
    de Freitas, Osvaldo
    Tocchini de Figueiredo, Fellipe Augusto
    Ferreira, Maira Peres
    Macedo, Ana Paula
    do Couto, Rene Oliveira
    Pedrazzi, Vinicius
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2021, 35