A cost-benefit analysis of transitional services for emancipating foster youth

被引:14
|
作者
Packard, Thomas [1 ]
Delgado, Melanie [2 ]
Fellmeth, Robert [2 ]
McCready, Karen [3 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Sch Social Work, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] Univ San Diego, Sch Law, Childrens Advocacy Inst, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
[3] Law Off Publ Defender San Diego Cty, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
Cost-benefit; Emancipated; Foster youth;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.03.011
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Over 24,000 youth "aged out" of the nation's foster care system in FY 2005. While independent living programs and other services are available to foster youth, and almost all states allow dependency courts to retain jurisdiction of foster youth beyond age 18, outcomes for former foster Youth are disturbing. This paper describes a program to address these challenges by providing extended foster care benefits and support to former foster youth from their 18th to 23rd birthdays. A detailed cost-benefit methodology documents expected costs and key benefits of the program. According to this cost-benefit analysis, a program providing funding and guardian Support for former foster youth is projected to result in net benefits to the State of California over the 40-year careers of participating former foster youth. The program, if successful for all Youth, Would increase lifetime earnings and taxes paid due to increased education and Would lower use of TANF and prison, resulting in a benefit-cost ratio of 1.5 to 1, using discounted present Value dollars. Even at 75% success, the ratio is 1.2 to 1, showing a net benefit to society. This methodology can also be used to assess the costs and benefits of similar programs. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1267 / 1278
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transitional Care in Neurosurgery
    Dagi, T. Forcht
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 85 (05) : 679 - 679
  • [2] Commentary: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transitional Care in Neurosurgery
    Dagenais, Simon
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 85 (05) : E837 - E838
  • [3] Cost-benefit analysis of ecosystem services in China
    Cao, Shixiong
    Yu, Zhongqi
    Zhang, Junze
    Feng, Fei
    Xu, Duanyang
    Mu, Xingmin
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 125 : 143 - 148
  • [4] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND PERSONAL SOCIAL SERVICES
    RATCLIFF.D
    [J]. POLICY AND POLITICS, 1974, 2 (03): : 237 - 247
  • [5] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND WITHDRAWAL OF RAILWAY SERVICES
    ELSE, PK
    HOWE, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 1969, 3 (02) : 178 - 194
  • [6] Foster youth emancipating from care: Caseworkers' reports on needs and services
    Leathers, Sonya J.
    Testa, Mark F.
    [J]. CHILD WELFARE, 2006, 85 (03) : 463 - 498
  • [7] PAYMENT FOR FOSTER PARENTS - COST-BENEFIT APPROACH
    PETERSON, V
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK, 1974, 19 (04) : 426 - 431
  • [8] Cost-benefit analysis of poison center phone services
    Michels, J. E.
    Blizzard, J. C.
    Holstege, C. P.
    Richardson, W. H.
    [J]. CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 44 (05): : 726 - 726
  • [9] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    [J]. NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903
  • [10] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    [J]. KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3