Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy

被引:85
|
作者
Bondarenko, Igor [1 ]
Gladkov, Oleg A. [2 ]
Elsaesser, Reiner [3 ]
Buchner, Anton [3 ]
Bias, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] State Med Acad, UA-49044 Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
[2] Chelyabinsk Reg Clin Oncol Ctr, Chelyabinsk, Russia
[3] Teva Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany
来源
BMC CANCER | 2013年 / 13卷
关键词
Neutropenia; Febrile neutropenia; Breast cancer; Recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; Lipegfilgrastim; Pegfilgrastim; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DAILY FILGRASTIM; DOUBLE-BLIND; FEVER; CYCLE; PROPHYLAXIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-13-386
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Lipegfilgrastim is a novel glyco-pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in development for neutropenia prophylaxis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This phase III, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with high-risk stage II, III, or IV breast cancer and an absolute neutrophil count >= 1.5 x 10(9) cells/L were randomized to a single 6-mg subcutaneous injection of lipegfilgrastim (n = 101) or pegfilgrastim (n = 101) on day 2 of each 21-day chemotherapy cycle (4 cycles maximum). The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1. Results: Cycle 1: The mean duration of severe neutropenia for the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups was 0.7 and 0.8 days, respectively (lambda = -0.218 [95% confidence interval: -0.498%, 0.062%], p = 0.126), and no severe neutropenia was observed in 56% and 49% of patients in the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. All cycles: In the efficacy population, febrile neutropenia occurred in three pegfilgrastim-treated patients (all in cycle 1) and zero lipegfilgrastim-treated patients. Drug-related adverse events in the safety population were reported in 28% and 26% of patients i006E the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that lipegfilgrastim 6 mg is as effective as pegfilgrastim in reducing neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy
    Igor Bondarenko
    Oleg A Gladkov
    Reiner Elsaesser
    Anton Buchner
    Peter Bias
    BMC Cancer, 13
  • [2] Analysis of ANC recovery from a Phase III study of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy
    Bondarenko, I.
    Bias, P.
    Elsaesser, R.
    Buchner, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S434 - S435
  • [3] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LIPEGFILGRASTIM COMPARED WITH PEGFILGRASTIM IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER WHO ARE RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY
    Udo, M.
    Bondarenko, I.
    Gladkov, O.
    Elaesser, R.
    Buchner, A.
    Bias, P.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2012, 97 : 553 - 553
  • [4] A Phase III Study of Balugrastim Versus Pegfilgrastim in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With Doxorubicin and Docetaxel
    Gladkov, Oleg
    Moiseyenko, Vladimir
    Bondarenko, Igor N.
    Shparyk, Yaroslav
    Barash, Steve
    Adar, Liat
    Avisar, Noa
    ONCOLOGIST, 2016, 21 (01): : 7 - 15
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim compared with pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy.
    Bondarenko, Igor
    Gladkov, Oleg
    Elaesser, Reiner
    Buchner, Anton
    Bias, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of Balugrastim Compared With Pegfilgrastim in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy
    Volovat, Constantin
    Gladkov, Oleg A.
    Bondarenko, Igor M.
    Barash, Steve
    Buchner, Anton
    Bias, Peter
    Adar, Liat
    Avisar, Noa
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2014, 14 (02) : 101 - 108
  • [7] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BALUGRASTIM COMPARED WITH PEGFILGRASTIM IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER WHO ARE RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY
    Udo, M.
    Volovat, C.
    Gladkov, O.
    Bondarenko, I.
    Barash, S.
    Buchner, A.
    Avisar, N.
    Bias, P.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2012, 97 : 47 - 47
  • [8] Chemotherapy-associated treatment burden in breast cancer patients receiving lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim: secondary efficacy data from a phase III study
    Gladkov, Oleg A.
    Buchner, Anton
    Bias, Peter
    Mueller, Udo
    Elsaesser, Reiner
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (01) : 395 - 400
  • [9] CHEMOTHERAPY-ASSOCIATED TREATMENT BURDEN IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING LIPEGFILGRASTIM OR PEGFILGRASTIM: SECONDARY EFFICACY DATA FROM A PHASE III STUDY
    Gladkov, O.
    Buchner, A.
    Bias, P.
    Mueller, U.
    Elsaesser, R.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2013, 98 : 426 - 426
  • [10] Chemotherapy-associated treatment burden in breast cancer patients receiving lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim: secondary efficacy data from a phase III study
    Oleg A. Gladkov
    Anton Buchner
    Peter Bias
    Udo Müller
    Reiner Elsässer
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 395 - 400