Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study

被引:269
|
作者
Semigran, Hannah L. [1 ]
Linder, Jeffrey A. [2 ,3 ]
Gidengil, Courtney [4 ,5 ]
Mehrotra, Ateev [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA USA
[5] RAND Corp, Boston, MA USA
[6] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
关键词
TELEPHONE TRIAGE; GENERAL-PRACTICE; UNITED-STATES; CARE; ACCURACY; INTERNET; CONSULTATION; INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.h3480
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic and triage accuracy of online symptom checkers (tools that use computer algorithms to help patients with self diagnosis or self triage). DESIGN Audit study. SETTING Publicly available, free symptom checkers. PARTICIPANTS 23 symptom checkers that were in English and provided advice across a range of conditions. 45 standardized patient vignettes were compiled and equally divided into three categories of triage urgency: emergent care required (for example, pulmonary embolism), non-emergent care reasonable (for example, otitis media), and self care reasonable (for example, viral upper respiratory tract infection). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES For symptom checkers that provided a diagnosis, our main outcomes were whether the symptom checker listed the correct diagnosis first or within the first 20 potential diagnoses (n= 770 standardized patient evaluations). For symptom checkers that provided a triage recommendation, our main outcomes were whether the symptom checker correctly recommended emergent care, non-emergent care, or self care (n= 532 standardized patient evaluations). RESULTS The 23 symptom checkers provided the correct diagnosis first in 34% (95% confidence interval 31% to 37%) of standardized patient evaluations, listed the correct diagnosis within the top 20 diagnoses given in 58% (55% to 62%) of standardized patient evaluations, and provided the appropriate triage advice in 57% (52% to 61%) of standardized patient evaluations. Triage performance varied by urgency of condition, with appropriate triage advice provided in 80% (95% confidence interval 75% to 86%) of emergent cases, 55% (47% to 63%) of non-emergent cases, and 33% (26% to 40%) of self care cases (P<0.001). Performance on appropriate triage advice across the 23 individual symptom checkers ranged from 33% (95% confidence interval 19% to 48%) to 78% (64% to 91%) of standardized patient evaluations. CONCLUSIONS Symptom checkers had deficits in both triage and diagnosis. Triage advice from symptom checkers is generally risk averse, encouraging users to seek care for conditions where self care is reasonable.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SYMPTOM CHECKERS FOR SELF-DIAGNOSIS AND TRIAGE: BEYOND "GOOGLING" SYMPTOMS
    Semigran, Hannah
    Linder, Jeffrey A.
    Gidengil, Courtney
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S271 - S271
  • [2] Young Adults' Perspectives on the Use of Symptom Checkers for Self-Triage and Self-Diagnosis: Qualitative Study
    Aboueid, Stephanie
    Meyer, Samantha
    Wallace, James R.
    Mahajan, Shreya
    Chaurasia, Ashok
    [J]. JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (01): : 4 - 17
  • [3] Evaluation of Accuracy and Consistency Between Symptom Checkers for Diagnosis and Triage of Gastrointestinal Symptoms
    Berry, Andrew C.
    Berry, Bruce B.
    Nakshabendi, Rahman
    Kanar, Ozdemir
    Myers, Travis
    Cash, Brooks D.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S236 - S236
  • [4] The quality of diagnosis and triage advice provided by free online symptom checkers and apps in Australia
    Gilbert, Stephen
    Wicks, Paul
    Novorol, Claire
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2021, 214 (03) : 144 - +
  • [5] The quality of diagnosis and triage advice provided by free online symptom checkers and apps in Australia
    Hill, Michella G.
    Sim, Moira
    Mills, Brennen
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2020, 212 (11) : 514 - 519
  • [6] Benchmarking Triage Capability of Symptom Checkers Against That of Medical Laypersons: Survey Study
    Schmieding, Malte L.
    Morgeli, Rudolf
    Schmieding, Maike A. L.
    Feufel, Markus A.
    Balzer, Felix
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (03)
  • [7] The quality of diagnosis and triage advice provided by free online symptom checkers and apps in Australia Reply
    Hill, Michella G.
    Sim, Moira
    Mills, Brennen
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2021,
  • [8] Triage and Diagnostic Accuracy of Online Symptom Checkers: Systematic Review
    Riboli-Sasco, Eva
    El-Osta, Austen
    Alaa, Aos
    Webber, Iman
    Karki, Manisha
    El Asmar, Marie Line
    Purohit, Katie
    Painter, Annabelle
    Hayhoe, Benedict
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [9] Evaluation of Baseline Health Literacy for Diagnostic and Triage Accuracy of Online Symptom Checkers for Gastrointestinal Illnesses
    Berry, Andrew C.
    Berry, Bruce
    Wang, Bin
    Mulekar, Madhuri
    Kanar, Ozdemir
    Nakshabendi, Rahman
    Berry, Nicholas
    Kichler, Kandace
    Sharma, Vicki
    Kishore, Varsha
    Elden, Andrew C.
    Nafisi, Shirin
    Nakshabandi, Ahmad
    Savani, Umair
    Pernenkil, Vikash
    Rifai, Fareed
    Sturdivant, Tyler L.
    Matese, Morgan
    Sperling, Alexandra
    Haas, Carly H.
    Harris, Ciel
    Cutrell, Patrick K.
    Turner, Justin
    Gunn, Brady
    Cash, Brooks D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S435 - S435
  • [10] Limitations of Study on Symptom Checkers
    Fraser, Hamish S. F.
    Clamp, Susan
    Wilson, Carol J.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 177 (05) : 740 - 741