Assessment of Four Methodologies (Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay, Chemiluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay, Affinity Column-Mediated Immunoassay, and Flow Injection Assay-Tandem Mass Spectrometry) for Measuring Tacrolimus Blood Concentration in Japanese Liver Transplant Recipients

被引:22
|
作者
Hashi, S. [1 ]
Masuda, S. [1 ]
Kikuchi, M. [1 ]
Uesugi, M. [1 ]
Yano, I. [1 ,2 ]
Omura, T. [1 ]
Yonezawa, A. [1 ]
Fujimoto, Y. [3 ]
Ogawa, K. [3 ]
Kaido, T. [3 ]
Uemoto, S. [3 ]
Matsubara, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol & Therapeut, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Clin Pharm & Educ, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Div Hepatobilliary Pancreat Surg & Transplantat, Kyoto, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.060
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and subsequent dosage adjustment for individual patients in the treatment with tacrolimus are required after liver transplantation to prevent rejection and over-immunosuppression, which leads to severe infection and adverse reactions including nephrotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance among commercially available immunoassay methods, which were microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLIA), and affinity column-mediated immunoassay (ACMIA), compared with an assay using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). In addition, the flow injection assay (FIA-MS/MS) was also evaluated to determine whether it could be available as a new method of analysis in tacrolimus therapy. The blood tacrolimus concentrations in samples from liver transplant recipients (n = 102) were measured using MEIA, CLIA, ACMIA, and LC-MS/MS. Additional blood samples from liver transplant recipients (n = 54) were analyzed using both FIA-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS. Because the assay performance and characteristics of MEIA, CLIA, ACMIA, and FIA-MS/MS are relatively different, the measured data should be carefully considered depending on the methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:758 / 760
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Is the Affinity Column-Mediated Immunoassay Method Suitable as an Alternative to the Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay Method as a Blood Tacrolimus Assay?
    Ju, M. K.
    Chang, H. K.
    Kim, H. J.
    Huh, K. H.
    Ahn, H. J.
    Kim, M. S.
    Kim, S. I.
    Kim, Y. S.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (10) : 3673 - 3678
  • [2] Comparison of the Affinity Column-Mediated Immunoassay and Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay Methods as a Tacrolimus Concentration Assay in the Early Period After Liver Transplantation
    Joo, D. J.
    Jung, I.
    Kim, M. S.
    Huh, K. H.
    Kim, H.
    Choi, J. S.
    Choi, G. H.
    Kim, S. I.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 42 (10) : 4137 - 4140
  • [3] The Comparison of the Affinity Column-Mediated Immunoassay Method and the Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay Method as a Tacrolimus Concentration Assay in Early Post-Liver-Transplantation Period
    Joo, Dong Jin
    Kim, Myoung Soo
    Ju, Man Ki
    Huh, Kyu Ha
    Kim, Soo Jin
    Choi, Jin Sub
    Choi, Ki Hong
    Kim, Soon Il
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (06) : S133 - S134
  • [4] Cloned enzyme donor immunoassay tacrolimus assay compared with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and microparticle enzyme immunoassay in liver and renal transplant recipients
    Westley, Ian S.
    Taylor, Paul J.
    Salm, Paul
    Morris, Raymond G.
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2007, 29 (05) : 584 - 591
  • [5] Therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus concentrations in blood of renal and liver transplant recipients: Comparison of microparticle enzyme immunoassay and enzyme multiplied immunoassay methods
    Bartlomiejczyk, I
    Zochowska, D
    Sanko-Resmer, J
    Matuszewicz, D
    Paczek, L
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (01) : 94 - 96
  • [6] Pentamer formation assay for determination of tacrolimus compared with hplc tandem mass spectrometry and microparticle enzyme immunoassay.
    Armstrong, VW
    Schuetz, E
    Zhang, Q
    Groothuisen, S
    Scholz, C
    Andreeva, M
    Aboleneen, H
    Oellerich, M
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 44 : A100 - A100
  • [7] Clinical relevance of monitoring tacrolimus: Comparison of microparticle enzyme immunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry in renal transplant recipients converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus
    Braun, F
    Lorf, T
    Schutz, E
    Christians, U
    Grupp, C
    Sattler, B
    Canelo, R
    Sewing, KF
    Armstrong, VW
    Oellerich, M
    Ringe, B
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (06) : 3175 - 3176
  • [8] The quantification of sirolimus by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and microparticle enzyme immunoassay in renal transplant recipients
    Salm, P
    Taylor, PJ
    Pillans, PI
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2000, 22 : B71 - B85
  • [9] Evaluation of microparticle enzyme immunoassay against HPLC-mass spectrometry for the determination of whole-blood tacrolimus in heart- and lung-transplant recipients
    Salm, P
    Rutherford, DM
    Taylor, PJ
    Black, MJ
    Pillans, PI
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 33 (07) : 557 - 562
  • [10] Comparative analysis of tacrolimus (FK506) in whole blood liver transplant recipients by PRO-TRAC enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and microparticle enzyme immunoassay IM(X) methods
    Brunet, M
    Pou, L
    Torra, M
    Lopez, R
    Rodamilans, M
    Corbella, J
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1996, 18 (06) : 706 - 709