共 50 条
The impact of declaring the state of emergency on human mobility during COVID-19 pandemic in Japan
被引:8
|作者:
Nakamoto, Daisuke
[1
]
Nojiri, Shuko
[1
,3
,6
,7
]
Taguchi, Chie
[4
]
Kawakami, Yuta
[2
,4
]
Miyazawa, Satoshi
[5
]
Kuroki, Manabu
[4
]
Nishizaki, Yuji
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Juntendo Univ, Clin Translat Sci, Grad Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Juntendo Univ, Clin Res & Trial Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Juntendo Univ, Med Technol Innovat Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Yokohama Natl Univ, Grad Sch Engn Sci, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[5] LocationMind Inc, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Juntendo Univ, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo ku, Tokyo 1138421, Japan
[7] Juntendo Univ, Univ Grad Sch Med, Clin Translat Sci, 2-1-1 Hongo,Bunkyo ku, Tokyo 1138421, Japan
来源:
关键词:
Coronavirus;
Infection control;
Isolation;
Difference-in-difference;
SPREAD;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101149
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Background/objectives: Japan has responded to the spread of COVID-19 through declaration of a state of emer-gency to regulate human mobility. Although the declaration was enforced by the government for prefectures, there is limited evidence as to whether the public complied with requests for voluntary stay at home. In this study, we evaluated the impact of declaring a state of emergency on human mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.Methods: We utilized daily human mobility data for 47 prefectures in Japan. Data were collected via mobile phone from February 1, 2020 to April 30, 2021. Difference-in-difference analysis was utilized to estimate the effects of the declaration of a state of emergency on prefectures in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area (Tokyo, Kanagawa, Saitama, and Chiba) in comparison to other prefectures where the state of emergency was first lifted (Osaka, Hyogo, Fukuoka, and Aichi).Results: Human mobility was suppressed during the second state of emergency, from January 8 to March 21, 2021. However, the impact was weaker for the second state of emergency compared to the first.Conclusion: In Japan, government requests for stay at home, such as the declaration of a state of emergency, were temporarily able to control human mobility. However, the second state of emergency was not as effective as the first. If additional need to regulate human mobility arises, self-restraint with stronger enforcement should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文