National Ethics Advisory Bodies in the Emerging Landscape of Responsible Research and Innovation

被引:16
|
作者
Mali, Franc [1 ]
Pustovrh, Toni [1 ]
Groboljsek, Blanka [1 ]
Coenen, Christopher [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Social Sci, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
Bioethics; Emerging technologies; Europe; Policy advice; Public participation; Responsible research and innovation; CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; PARTICIPATION; EXPERTISE; SCIENCE; BIOETHICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11569-012-0157-z
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The article examines the role played by policy advice institutions in the governance of ethically controversial new and emerging science and technology in Europe. The empirical analysis, which aims to help close a gap in the literature, focuses on the evolution, role and functioning of national ethics advisory bodies (EABs) in Europe. EABs are expert bodies whose remit is to issue recommendations regarding ethical aspects of new and emerging science and technology. Negative experiences with the impacts of science and technology in the past have resulted in calls for increased transparency and broader participation and pluralism in expert advice and policy decision-making. Do national EABs function as inclusive, anticipatory "hybrid forums"? Or do they resemble more "classical" expert-oriented bodies, inspired by technocratic or decisionist approaches? As part of the empirical analysis of the role and functioning of institutional ethical advisory structures in 32 European countries, an extensive analysis of EAB websites and the content of publicly available documents on such institutions has been carried out, supplemented by an online survey of representatives of the EABs. One major finding of the empirical analysis is the very uneven distribution of "hybrid forum" features of EABs across Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 184
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] National Ethics Advisory Bodies in the Emerging Landscape of Responsible Research and Innovation
    Franc Mali
    Toni Pustovrh
    Blanka Groboljsek
    Christopher Coenen
    [J]. NanoEthics, 2012, 6 : 167 - 184
  • [2] Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies On the implementation of responsible research and innovation
    Stahl, Bernd Carsten
    Timmermans, Job
    Flick, Catherine
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2017, 44 (03) : 369 - 381
  • [3] Civic ethics as a normative framework for responsible research and innovation
    Lozano, Felix
    Monsonis-Paya, Irene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2020, 7 (03) : 490 - 506
  • [4] Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation
    Stahl, Bernd Carsten
    Coeckelbergh, Mark
    [J]. ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2016, 86 : 152 - 161
  • [5] Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework
    Stahl, Bernd Carsten
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 40 (06) : 708 - 716
  • [6] Emerging patterns in the academic literature on responsible research and innovation
    Loureiro, Paulo Maia
    Conceicao, Cristina Palma
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2019, 58
  • [7] RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN EMERGING ECONOMIES:A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Cervi Neto, Jose Francisco
    Froehlich, Cristiane
    Goncalves, Manuela Albornoz
    [J]. GESTAO E DESENVOLVIMENTO, 2021, 18 (02): : 72 - 89
  • [8] Inescapable Frameworks: Ethics of Care, Ethics of Rights and the Responsible Research and Innovation Model
    Daniele Ruggiu
    [J]. Philosophy of Management, 2020, 19 : 237 - 265
  • [9] Virtue Ethics for Responsible Innovation
    Steen, Marc
    Sand, Martin
    Van de Poel, Ibo
    [J]. BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL, 2021, 40 (02) : 243 - 268
  • [10] The ecology and culture of landscape sustainability: emerging knowledge and innovation in landscape research and practice
    Laura R. Musacchio
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2009, 24 : 989 - 992