Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates

被引:122
|
作者
Harrison, M [1 ]
Singh, N [1 ]
Rex, DK [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Hosp, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2004年 / 99卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04070.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Small adenomas are commonly missed during routine colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine whether routine retroflexion in the proximal colon would improve adenoma detection rates. Methods: One hundred patients underwent colonoscopy from the cecum to the splenic flexure by a gastroenterology fellow, with the removal of all visualized polyps. The cecum was then reintubated and patients were randomized to a second exam of the proximal colon by an experienced staff physician in either the forward view or a retroflexed view. Results: Two patients were excluded due to a difficult initial cecal intubation. Forty-eight patients were randomized to forward view and 50 patients were randomized to a retroflexed view. Retroflexion was successful in the cecum in 60%, the ascending colon 100%, and the transverse colon 98%. The success in retroflexion was determined in part by the type of colonoscope used. If any portion of the retroflexed examination could not be performed, that reexamination was performed in the forward view. The calculated miss rates for all polyps and adenomas among patients randomized to second examination in the forward view was 36.8% and 33.3%, respectively. The calculated miss rate for all polyps and for adenomas among patients randomized to a second examination in the retroflexed view was 38.1% and 23.7%, respectively. There was no difference in miss rates for all polyps or for adenomas (p=0.31) when the second examination was performed in the forward view versus retroflexed view. Conclusions: A second examination by retroflexion in the proximal colon did not increase the calculated miss rate relative to that performed by a forward view examination. These results do not support the addition of routine right colon retroflexion to colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 522
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates
    Singh, N
    Harrison, M
    Bratcher, LL
    Rex, DK
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (05) : AB222 - AB222
  • [2] IMPACT OF RIGHT COLON RETROFLEXION ON ADENOMA DETECTION RATE
    Widlak, M.
    Muhammad, H.
    Smith, M.
    Shetty, S.
    Cooper, S. C.
    De Silva, S.
    Fisher, N.
    Ishaq, S.
    GUT, 2013, 62 : A157 - A157
  • [3] Impact of retroflexion in the proximal colon after tandem colonoscopy
    Miyamoto, Hideaki
    Shono, Takashi
    Naoe, Hideaki
    Narita, Rei
    Hashigo, Syunpei
    Hasuda, Kiwamu
    Sakurai, Kouichi
    Oda, Yasushi
    Sasaki, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 : 313 - 314
  • [4] Withdrawal Time Improves Adenoma Detection Rates During Retroflexion in the Right Colon
    Gaddam, Srinivas
    Hollander, Thomas G.
    Edmundowicz, Steven A.
    Early, Dayna S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S227 - S227
  • [5] Impact of Adenoma Size in Distal Colon on Risk for Advanced Adenoma of the Proximal Colon
    Williamson B. Strum
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2006, 51 : 2064 - 2067
  • [6] Impact of adenoma size in distal colon on risk for advanced adenoma of the proximal colon
    Strum, Williamson B.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2006, 51 (11) : 2064 - 2067
  • [7] Polyp and Adenoma Detection Rates in the Proximal and Distal Colon
    Boroff, Erika S.
    Gurudu, Suryakanth R.
    Hentz, Joseph G.
    Leighton, Jonathan A.
    Ramirez, Francisco C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 (06): : 993 - 999
  • [8] Does retroflexion improve adenoma miss rates on the right side of the colon when using a pediatric variable-stiffness colonoscope during routine colonoscopy?
    Baumann, U. A.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (07) : 654 - 654
  • [9] Right Colon Retroflexion Increases the Yield of Polyps in the Proximal Colon
    Rex, Douglas
    Hewett, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S540 - S541
  • [10] ADENOMA DETECTION RATES CORRELATE VERY STRONGLY WITH PROXIMAL COLON ADENOMA DETECTION RATES BUT NOT WITH PROXIMAL SERRATED POLYP DETECTION RATES: A MULTICENTER STUDY
    Mandaliya, Rohan H.
    Raymond, Allyson
    Baig, Kamal
    Mirza, Muhammad
    Barnhill, Michele
    Som, Aniruddh
    Vangimalla, Shiva Shankar
    Murugesan, Vagishwari
    Jhaveri, Khushali
    Hasan, Lubaba
    Cho, Won
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S144 - S144