Current Status of Robotic Surgery

被引:27
|
作者
Giri, Subhasis [1 ]
Sarkar, Diptendra K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Urol, London, England
[2] IPGME&R Hosp, Dept Surg, Kolkata, India
[3] SSKM Hosp, Dept Surg, Kolkata, India
关键词
Robotic surgery; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; FUNDOPLICATION; ADRENALECTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s12262-012-0595-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Surgery has increasingly become a technology-driven specialty. Robotic assistance is considered one innovation within abdominal surgery over the past decade that has the potential to compensate for the drawbacks of conventional laparoscopy. The dramatic evolution of robotic surgery over the past 10 years is likely to be eclipsed by even greater advances over the next decade. We review the current status of robotic technology in surgery. The Medline database was searched for the terms "robotic surgery, telesurgery, and laparoscopy." A total of 2,496 references were found. All references were considered for information on robotic surgery in advanced laparoscopy. Further references were obtained through cross-referencing the bibliography cited in each work. There is a paucity of control studies on a sufficient number of subjects in robot-assisted surgeries in all fields. Studies that meet more stringent clinical trials criteria show that robot-assisted surgery appears comparable to traditional surgery in terms of feasibility and outcomes but that costs associated with robot-assisted surgery are higher because of longer operating times and expense of equipment. While a limited number of studies on the da Vinci robotic system have proven the benefit of this approach in regard to patient outcomes, including significantly reduced blood loss, lower percentage of postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stays, there are mechanical and institutional risks that must be more fully addressed. Robotic assistance will remain an intensively discussed subject since clinical benefits for most procedures have not yet been proven. While the benefit still remains open to discussion, robotic systems are spreading and are available worldwide in tertiary centers.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 247
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current Status of Robotic Surgery
    Subhasis Giri
    Diptendra K. Sarkar
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2012, 74 : 242 - 247
  • [2] Current Status of Robotic Surgery
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    [J]. 2010 3RD IEEE RAS AND EMBS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS, 2010,
  • [3] Current status of robotic surgery in Japan
    Nishimura, Kazuo
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 56 (03) : 170 - 178
  • [4] The current status of robotic oncologic surgery
    Yu, Hua-yin
    Friedlander, David F.
    Patel, Sunil
    Hu, Jim C.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2013, 63 (01) : 45 - 56
  • [5] CURRENT STATUS OF ROBOTIC SURGERY IN UROLOGY
    Ogaya-Pinies, Gabriel
    [J]. ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2019, 72 (03): : 225 - 226
  • [6] Current Status of Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery
    Minamimura, Keisuke
    Hara, Keisuke
    Matsumoto, Satoshi
    Yasuda, Tomohiko
    Arai, Hiroki
    Kakinuma, Daisuke
    Ohshiro, Yukio
    Kawano, Youichi
    Watanabe, Masanori
    Suzuki, Hideyuki
    Yoshida, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL, 2023, 90 (04) : 308 - 315
  • [7] Current status of robotic colorectal surgery
    Kwak J.M.
    Kim S.H.
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2011, 5 (1) : 65 - 72
  • [8] Paediatric robotic surgery A review of the current status of robotic surgery use in paediatrics
    Cave, Joshua
    Clarke, Simon
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2018, 100 : 18 - +
  • [9] Current Readings: Status of Robotic Cardiac Surgery
    Kaneko, Tsuyoshi
    Chitwood, Walter Randolph, Jr.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 25 (02) : 165 - 170
  • [10] The current status of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Pigazzi, Alessio
    Halabi, Wissam J.
    [J]. COLORECTAL CANCER, 2013, 2 (02) : 113 - 116