OPERATIVE VERSUS NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT CLAVICULAR FRACTURES A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Scott, Meredith L. [1 ,2 ]
Baldwin, Keith D. [1 ,3 ]
Mistovich, R. Justin [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Coll Med & Life Sci, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
AGED; 10; FIXATION; CHILDREN; BANDAGE;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00043
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The optimal treatment of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures in pediatric and adolescent patients remains controversial. Furthermore, risk factors for the failure of nonoperative treatment have not been clearly defined. Therefore, we designed a systematic review and critical analysis to assess appropriate Grades of Recommendation for evidence-based treatment of middle-third clavicular fractures in the pediatric and adolescent populations. Methods: We performed a systematic review following a search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases that was conducted in May 2017. The search terms were clavicle, clavic*, and fracture. Our specific PubMed search was ("clavicle"[MeSH] OR clavic*) AND ("fracture"[MeSH] OR fracture*). The results were filtered for English language and subjects <= 18 years of age. There was no chronological limit on the results. The results were then assessed for relevance via a stepwise approach by first screening titles, then abstracts, and, finally, full text. The levels of evidence were determined for studies that met the inclusion criteria. The findings were summarized, and Grades of Recommendation were assigned by consensus. Results: Our search returned 3,615 studies. Of these, 215 were potentially relevant. Studies that did not meet our inclusion criteria were removed by consensus. One hundred and nineteen full-text articles were then assessed. Of these, 19 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, patients with both operative and nonoperative treatment of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures have good functional outcomes, with Grade-B supporting evidence. There is Grade-B evidence that operative treatment results in a high complication rate. Both plating and nailing have a high likelihood of requiring implant removal, with Grade-B evidence. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effect of both nonoperative and operative treatment on patient cosmesis following displaced fractures. There is Grade-B evidence that nonunions of pediatric clavicular fractures are exceptionally rare, regardless of treatment strategy. Nonoperatively treated displaced fractures have conflicting evidence regarding any adverse effect displacement may have on functional status. Conclusions: Existing literature does not clearly delineate appropriate indications for nonoperative care or relative indications for operative intervention. Further studies are needed to guide treatment and promote better informed consent.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clavicular midshaft fractures Operative versus nonoperative treatment
    Mohit Bhandari
    Joseph R.Dettori
    中华创伤骨科杂志, 2004, (12) : 68 - 70
  • [2] Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures
    Stengel, D.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2012, 115 (11): : 1041 - 1043
  • [3] Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gao, Burke
    Dwivedi, Shashank
    Patel, Shyam A.
    Nwizu, Chibuikem
    Cruz, Aristides I., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2019, 33 (11) : E439 - E446
  • [4] Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Pediatric Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Song, Hae-Ryong
    Song, Mi Hyun
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (06) : 1022 - 1028
  • [5] Early Operative Versus Delayed Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Pediatric and Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    James, Evan W.
    Dawkins, Brody J.
    Schachne, Jonathan M.
    Ganley, Theodore J.
    Kocher, Mininder S.
    Fabricant, Peter D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (14): : 4008 - 4017
  • [6] Operative versus nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lode, Ingunn
    Nordviste, Vegard
    Erichsen, Julie Ladeby
    Schmal, Hagen
    Viberg, Bjarke
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (12) : 2495 - 2504
  • [7] Is There a Deficit After Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment of Shortened Midshaft Clavicular Fractures in Adolescents?
    Parry, Joshua A.
    Van Straaten, Meegan
    Luo, Tianyi D.
    Simon, Anne-Laure
    Ashraf, Ali
    Kaufman, Kenton
    Larson, A. Noelle
    Shaughnessy, William J.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 37 (04) : 227 - 233
  • [8] Operative versus nonoperative treatment of multiple simple rib fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wijffels, Mathieu M. E.
    Prins, Jonne T. H.
    Alvino, Eva J. Perpetua
    Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2020, 51 (11): : 2368 - 2378
  • [9] Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review
    Rehn C.-H.
    Kirkegaard M.
    Viberg B.
    Larsen M.S.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2014, 24 (7) : 1047 - 1053
  • [10] Operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Lingde Kong
    Yingze Zhang
    Yong Shen
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2014, 134 : 1493 - 1500