Leaving the Road to Abilene: A Pragmatic Approach to Addressing the Normative Paradox of Responsible Management Education

被引:38
|
作者
Moosmayer, Dirk C. [1 ]
Waddock, Sandra [2 ]
Wang, Long [3 ]
Huhn, Matthias P. [4 ]
Dierksmeier, Claus [5 ]
Gohl, Christopher [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Business Sch China, 199 Taikang East Rd, Ningbo 315100, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Boston Coll, Carroll Sch Management, Carroll Sch Scholar Corp Responsibil, 140 Commonwealth Ave, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Kowloon, AC2-5111,83 Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Navarra, Campus Univ, Pamplona 31009, Spain
[5] Univ Tubingen, Globalizat Eth, Inst Polit Sci, Melanchthonstr 36, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
[6] Univ Tubingen, Global Eth Inst, Hintere Grabenstr 26, D-72070 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Values; Self-interest; Freedom; Pragmatism; Dewey; Learning; PRME; Business education; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; BUSINESS ETHICS; POLITICAL CONCEPTION; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE; ECONOMICS; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; TIME; PROFESSIONALISM;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-018-3961-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We identify a normative paradox of responsible management education. Business educators aim to promote social values and develop ethical habits and socially responsible mindsets through education, but they attempt to do so with theories that have normative underpinnings and create actual normative effects that counteract their intentions. We identify a limited conceptualization of freedom in economic theorizing as a cause of the paradox. Economic theory emphasizes individual freedom and understands this as the freedom to choose from available options (a view that can be characterized as quantitative, negative freedom). However, conceptualizing individuals as profit-maximizing actors neglects their freedom to reflect on the purposes and goals of their actions (a qualitative, potential view of freedom). We build on the work of pragmatist philosopher John Dewey, who distinguishes between habitualized and creative problem-solving behaviors (theory of action), conceptualizes knowledge construction as a process of interdependent scientific social inquiry (epistemology), and understands actors as having the freedom to determine what kind of people they wish to be (ethics). We apply pragmatist theory to business education and suggest equipping students with a plurality of theories, supplementing neoclassical economics with other economic perspectives (e.g., Post-Keynesian, Marxist, ecological, evolutionary, and feminist economics) and views from other disciplines (e.g., sociology, psychology, and political science) on economic behavior. Moreover, we suggest putting students into learning situations that require practical problem solution through interdependent social inquiry (e.g., using cases and real-world business projects), encouraging ethical reflection. In doing so, we contribute by linking the problematic conceptions of freedom identified in economic theorizing to the debate on responsible management education. We conceptualize a pragmatist approach to management education that explicitly re-integrates the freedom to discursively reflect on the individual and societal purpose of business activity and thereby makes existing tools and pedagogies useful for bringing potential freedom back into business.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 932
页数:20
相关论文
共 9 条