Molecular Analysis of Multifocal Prostate Cancer by Comparative Genomic Hybridization

被引:36
|
作者
Kobayashi, Masayuki
Ishida, Haruna [3 ]
Shindo, Takayuki [3 ]
Niwa, Shin-ichiro [3 ]
Kino, Mika
Kawamura, Koji
Kamiya, Naoto
Imamoto, Takashi
Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
Hirokawa, Yoshifumi [2 ]
Shiraishi, Taizo [2 ]
Tanizawa, Tohru [4 ]
Nakatani, Yukio [4 ]
Ichikawa, Tomohiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, Chuo Ku, Chiba 2608670, Japan
[2] Mie Univ, Grad Sch Med, Inst Mol & Expt Med, Dept Pathol Oncol, Tsu, Mie 514, Japan
[3] Link Genom Inc, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Chiba 2608670, Japan
来源
PROSTATE | 2008年 / 68卷 / 16期
关键词
prostate cancer; multifocal; comparative genomic hybridization (CGH); laser capture microdissection (LCM); 8p; heterogeneity;
D O I
10.1002/pros.20832
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Prostate cancer is often multifocal and shows histological heterogeneity among different tumor foci within the same prostate. We analyzed the origin and molecular basis of multifocal prostate cancer and genomic alterations associated with tumor progression. METHODS. We examined 45 multifocal prostate cancer foci from 22 radical prostatectomy specimens by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Laser capture microdissection (LCM) was used to gather cancer cells from frozen prostate specimens. RESULTS. Frequent chromosomal alternations were losses of 2q21-24 (22.2%), 6q14-22 (60.0%), 8p12-22 (35.6%), 13q14-31 (44.4%) and 16q13-24 (24.4%) and gains of 8q21.3-24.3 (37.8%) and 7q21-33 (20.0%). Frequency of losses of 8p12-22 and 16q13-24 and gains of 8q21.3-24.3 were significantly higher in tumors with high Gleason score (GS) than in those with low GS (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01, respectively). Tumors with losses of 8p12-22 or 13q14-31 displayed larger volume than those without such losses (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). In comparison between different tumor foci within the same prostate, chromosomal alterations did not show completely the same pattern between any tumor foci, except for one case in which two of the three foci displayed no chromosomal abnormalities. More malignant tumors (high GS or extracapsular invasion) displayed significantly higher frequency of losses of 8p12-22 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS. These results suggest that tumor foci within the same prostate represent independent tumors with differing clonal origin and that loss of 8p12-22 represents an important determinant of prostate cancer progression. Prostate 68: 1715-1724, 2008. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1715 / 1724
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative genomic hybridization and molecular cytogenetic characterization of two prostate cancer xenografts
    Williams, BJ
    Jones, E
    Kozlowski, JM
    Vessella, R
    Brothman, AR
    [J]. GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 1997, 18 (04): : 299 - 304
  • [2] Genomic heterogeneity and molecular classification of multifocal prostate cancer.
    Lovf, Marthe
    Carm, Kristina Totland
    Zhao, Sen
    Axcrona, Ulrika
    Johannessen, Bjarne
    Bakken, Anne Cathrine
    Hoff, Andreas M.
    Myklebost, Ola
    Meza-Zepeda, Leonardo A.
    Lie, A. Kathrine
    Axcrona, Karol
    Lothe, Ragnhild A.
    Skotheim, Rolf I.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (16) : 113 - 113
  • [3] Genetic changes in familial prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization
    Rökman, A
    Koivisto, PA
    Matikainen, MP
    Kuukasjärvi, T
    Poutiainen, M
    Helin, HJ
    Karhu, R
    Kallioniemi, OP
    Schleutker, J
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2001, 46 (03): : 233 - 239
  • [4] Molecular analysis of multifocal prostate cancer lesions
    Ruijter, ETG
    Miller, GJ
    Van de Kaa, CA
    Van Bokhoven, A
    Bussemakers, MJG
    Debruyne, FMJ
    Ruiter, DJ
    Schalken, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 188 (03): : 271 - 277
  • [5] COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION IN RELATION TO MOLECULAR AND CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS
    NACHEVA, E
    BITTNER, M
    LEDBETTER, D
    JENKINS, R
    SEELIG, S
    GRACE, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1995, 57 (04) : 1756 - 1756
  • [6] Comparative genomic hybridization: A comparison with molecular and cytogenetic analysis
    Nacheva, EP
    Grace, CD
    Bittner, M
    Ledbetter, DH
    Jenkins, RB
    Green, AR
    [J]. CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 1998, 100 (02) : 93 - 105
  • [7] High throughput comparative genomic hybridization array analysis of multifocal urothelial cancers
    Takahashi, T
    Kawanishi, H
    Ito, M
    Watanabe, J
    Higashi, S
    Kamoto, T
    Nishiyama, H
    Ogawa, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 198 - 199
  • [8] High throughput comparative genomic hybridization array analysis of multifocal urothelial cancers
    Kawanishi, Hiroaki
    Takahashi, Takeshi
    Ito, Masaaki
    Watanabe, Jun
    Higashi, Shin
    Kamoto, Toshiyuki
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    Kadowaki, Tadashi
    Tsujimoto, Gozoh
    Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
    Ogawa, Osamu
    [J]. CANCER SCIENCE, 2006, 97 (08) : 746 - 752
  • [9] Genetic alterations in microdissected prostate cancer cells by comparative genomic hybridization
    S-H Kim
    MS Kim
    RH Jensen
    [J]. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2000, 3 : 110 - 114
  • [10] Genetic alterations in microdissected prostate cancer cells by comparative genomic hybridization
    Kim, SH
    Kim, MS
    Jensen, RH
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2000, 3 (02) : 110 - 114