Is glans penis width a risk factor for complications after hypospadias repair?

被引:16
|
作者
Faasse, M. A. [1 ,2 ]
Johnson, E. K. [1 ]
Bowen, D. K. [1 ]
Lindgren, B. W. [1 ]
Maizels, M. [1 ]
Marcus, C. R. [1 ]
Jovanovic, B. D. [3 ]
Yerkes, E. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Div Urol, 225 E Chicago Ave, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Advocate Childrens Hosp, 4400 W 95th St, Chicago, IL 60453 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med Biostat, 680 N Lake Shore Dr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Hypospadias; Risk factors; Complications; Measurements; Glans width; Glans size; INCISED PLATE URETHROPLASTY; URETHRAL PLATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.017
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction Recent studies have suggested that a smaller glans penis size may be associated with a higher likelihood of complications after hypospadias repair. Accurate identification of risk factors other than the well-understood variable of meatal location would allow development of better prognostic models and individualized risk stratification. Objective To test the hypothesis that a smaller width of the glans penis predicts adverse outcomes after hypospadias surgery. Methods Prospectively recorded clinical data were reviewed from a single-institution registry of primary hypospadias repairs performed between 2011 and 2014. Follow-up records were examined for occurrence of complications. Urethroplasty complications were defined to include meatal stenosis, dehiscence, urethrocutaneous fistula, urethral stricture, and/or urethral diverticulum. The subset of meatal stenosis and dehiscence were regarded as glanular complications. Regression analyses were performed to determine association between glans width and occurrence of complications. Because pre-operative androgen stimulation is known to increase glans penis size, separate subgroup analyses were Results A total of 159 patients met criteria for inclusion in the study cohort: 140 patients underwent a singl-stage repair, while 19 patients had a two-stage repair. The median glans penis width was 15 mm (range 10-22). Eighty-four patients (53%) received testosterone cream pre-operatively and had a significantly wider glans penis than the 75 patients who did not (median 15.5 vs 14 mm; P < 0.001). Median clinical follow-up was 7 months (IQR 1-12), with a minimum time elapsed since surgery of 10 months at the time of chart review. Twenty-four patients (15%) had one or more urethroplasty complications, including 11 (7%) with glanular complications. Overall, there was no statistically significant association between glans width and urethroplasty complications (P = 0.26) or glanular complications (P = 0.90) (Summary Table). Subgroup analyses of patients with and without preoperative testosterone also revealed no significant associations between glans width and complications. Conclusions Glans penis width was not a risk factor for complications after hypospadias repair. This finding differs from the results of other recent studies and encourages further research into the value of measuring penile parameters in patients undergoing hypospadias repair.
引用
收藏
页码:202.e1 / 202.e5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commentary to 'Is glans penis width a risk factor for complications after hypospadias repair?'
    Bush, Nicol Corbin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2016, 12 (05) : 317 - 318
  • [2] Re: Is Glans Penis Width a Risk Factor for Complications after Hypospadias Repair?
    Canning, Douglas A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (03): : 845 - 846
  • [3] Response to commentary re 'Is glans penis width a risk factor for complications after hypospadias repair?'
    Yerkes, Elizabeth B.
    Faasse, Mark A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2016, 12 (04) : 203 - 203
  • [4] Glans size is an independent risk factor for urethroplasty complications after hypospadias repair
    Bush, Nicol C.
    Villanueva, Carlos
    Snodgrass, Warren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2015, 11 (06) : 355.e1 - 355.e5
  • [5] Re: Glans Size is an Independent Risk Factor for Urethroplasty Complications after Hypospadias Repair
    Canning, Douglas A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : 1108 - 1108
  • [6] Glans penis in hypospadias
    Ramaswamy, CN
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (05) : 1776 - 1777
  • [7] Glans penis width in patients with hypospadias compared to healthy controls
    Bush, Nicol Corbin
    DaJusta, Daniel
    Snodgrass, Warren T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2013, 9 (06) : 1188 - 1191
  • [8] A HYPOSPADIAS REPAIR WITH PLACEMENT OF THE URETHRAL MEATUS IN THE GLANS PENIS
    JOHNSON, SH
    MARSHALL, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1958, 80 (05): : 360 - 363
  • [9] Amputation of the glans penis and hypospadias after circumcision: a case report
    Cevik, Muazzez
    Sogut, Ozgur
    Boleken, Mehmet Emin
    Halil, Kaya
    Ocal, Servet
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 27 (04) : 246 - 248
  • [10] Spongiosum-combined glanuloplasty reduces glans complications after proximal hypospadias repair
    Lyu, Yi-Qing
    Yu, Lin
    Xie, Hua
    Huang, Yi-Chen
    Li, Xiao-Xi
    Sun, Li
    Liang, Yan
    Chen, Fang
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2021, 23 (05) : 532 - 536