Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models

被引:265
|
作者
Arora, Vivek K. [1 ]
Katavouta, Anna [2 ,3 ]
Williams, Richard G. [2 ]
Jones, Chris D. [4 ]
Brovkin, Victor [5 ,6 ]
Friedlingstein, Pierre [7 ]
Schwinger, Jorg [8 ]
Bopp, Laurent [9 ]
Boucher, Olivier [9 ]
Cadule, Patricia [9 ]
Chamberlain, Matthew A. [10 ]
Christian, James R. [1 ]
Delire, Christine [11 ]
Fisher, Rosie A. [12 ,17 ]
Hajima, Tomohiro [13 ]
Ilyina, Tatiana [5 ]
Joetzjer, Emilie [11 ]
Kawamiya, Michio [13 ]
Koven, Charles D. [14 ]
Krasting, John P. [15 ]
Law, Rachel M. [16 ]
Lawrence, David M. [17 ]
Lenton, Andrew [10 ]
Lindsay, Keith [17 ]
Pongratz, Julia [5 ,18 ]
Raddatz, Thomas [5 ]
Seferian, Roland [11 ]
Tachiiri, Kaoru [13 ]
Tjiputra, Jerry F. [8 ]
Wiltshire, Andy [4 ]
Wu, Tongwen [19 ]
Ziehn, Tilo [16 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Canadian Ctr Climate Modelling & Anal, Environm & Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Environm Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Natl Oceanog Ctr, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] Met Off Hadley Ctr, Exeter, Devon, England
[5] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Bundesstr 53, Hamburg, Germany
[6] Univ Hamburg, CEN, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Univ Exeter, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, Exeter, Devon, England
[8] NORCE Norwegian Res Ctr, Bjerknes Ctr Climate Res, Bergen, Norway
[9] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, IPSL, Paris, France
[10] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[11] Univ Toulouse, CNRS, Meteo France, CNRM, Toulouse, France
[12] Ctr Europeen Rech & Format Avancee Calcul Sci CER, Toulouse, France
[13] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Res Inst Global Change, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[14] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Climate & Ecosyst Sci Div, Berkeley, CA USA
[15] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ USA
[16] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Aspendale, Vic, Australia
[17] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Lab, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[18] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Geog, Munich, Germany
[19] China Meteorol Adm, Beijing Climate Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; SEA-ICE MODEL; AUSTRALIAN COMMUNITY CLIMATE; OCEAN BIOGEOCHEMICAL MODEL; CONVECTIVE BOUNDARY-LAYER; CO2 ENRICHMENT FACE; CYCLE FEEDBACKS; ATMOSPHERIC CO2; PART I; SIMULATOR ACCESS-ESM1;
D O I
10.5194/bg-17-4173-2020
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Results from the fully and biogeochemically coupled simulations in which CO2 increases at a rate of 1 % yr(-1) (1pctCO2) from its preindustrial value are analyzed to quantify the magnitude of carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedback parameters which measure the response of ocean and terrestrial carbon pools to changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration and the resulting change in global climate, respectively. The results are based on 11 comprehensive Earth system models from the most recent sixth) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and compared with eight models from the fifth CMIP (CMIP5). The strength of the carbon-concentration feedback is of comparable magnitudes over land (mean +/- standard deviation = 0.97 +/- 0.40 PgC ppm(-1)) and ocean (0.79 +/- 0.07 PgC ppm(-1)), while the carbon-climate feedback over land (-45.1 +/- 50.6 PgC degrees C-1) is about 3 times larger than over ocean (-17.2 +/- 5.0 PgC degrees C-1). The strength of both feedbacks is an order of magnitude more uncertain over land than over ocean as has been seen in existing studies. These values and their spread from 11 CMIP6 models have not changed significantly compared to CMIP5 models. The absolute values of feedback parameters are lower for land with models that include a representation of nitrogen cycle. The transient climate response to cumulative emissions (TCRE) from the 11 CMIP6 models considered here is 1.77 +/- 0.37 degrees C EgC(-1) and is similar to that found in CMIP5 models (1.63 +/- 0.48 degrees C EgC(-1)) but with somewhat reduced model spread. The expressions for feedback parameters based on the fully and biogeochemically coupled configurations of the 1pctCO2 simulation are simplified when the small temperature change in the biogeochemically coupled simulation is ignored. Decomposition of the terms of these simplified expressions for the feedback parameters is used to gain insight into the reasons for differing responses among ocean and land carbon cycle models.
引用
收藏
页码:4173 / 4222
页数:50
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon-Concentration and Carbon-Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models
    Arora, Vivek K.
    Boer, George J.
    Friedlingstein, Pierre
    Eby, Michael
    Jones, Chris D.
    Christian, James R.
    Bonan, Gordon
    Bopp, Laurent
    Brovkin, Victor
    Cadule, Patricia
    Hajima, Tomohiro
    Ilyina, Tatiana
    Lindsay, Keith
    Tjiputra, Jerry F.
    Wu, Tongwen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (15) : 5289 - 5314
  • [2] Soil carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models
    Varney, Rebecca M.
    Friedlingstein, Pierre
    Chadburn, Sarah E.
    Burke, Eleanor J.
    Cox, Peter M.
    [J]. BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2024, 21 (11) : 2759 - 2776
  • [3] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes
    Chen, Huopo
    Sun, Jianqi
    Lin, Wenqing
    Xu, Huiwen
    [J]. SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) : 1415 - 1418
  • [4] Comparison of Indian Ocean warming simulated by CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Li Jingyi
    Su Jingzhi
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 13 (06) : 604 - 611
  • [5] Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Hahn, L. C.
    Armour, K. C.
    Zelinka, M. D.
    Bitz, C. M.
    Donohoe, A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [6] Cloud Climatologies from Global Climate Models-A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models with Satellite Data
    Lauer, Axel
    Bock, Lisa
    Hassler, Birgit
    Schroeder, Marc
    Stengel, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2023, 36 (02) : 281 - 311
  • [7] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 147 (1-2) : 535 - 548
  • [8] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Mohammed Sanusi Shiru
    Eun-Sung Chung
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    Xiao-jun Wang
    [J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 147 : 535 - 548
  • [9] Evolution of Uncertainty in Terrestrial Carbon Storage in Earth System Models from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Wei, Ning
    Xia, Jianyang
    Zhou, Jian
    Jiang, Lifen
    Cui, Erqian
    Ping, Jiaye
    Luo, Yiqi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (17) : 5483 - 5499
  • [10] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models performance in simulating temperature in Northeast China
    He XiaMan
    Jiang Chao
    Wang Jun
    Wang XiangPing
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2022, 65 (11): : 4194 - 4207